IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i14p5779-d386104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Product/Service-System Family Design for Efficient Customization with Lean Principles: Model, Method, and Tool

Author

Listed:
  • Tomohiko Sakao

    (Division of Environmental Technology Management, Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden)

  • Tatsunori Hara

    (Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan)

  • Ryo Fukushima

    (Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan)

Abstract

Facing the need to address environmental issues of our society and individual customer needs and wants along with the trend of offering hybrids of services and products, the ability to efficiently design hybrid offerings is imperative to provide high levels of added value. This ability is much needed throughout the industry, while this type of design is highly challenging due to its high complexity. To date, however, there have been only a few proposals for methods that tackle this challenge at the conceptual design stage. This article proposes a model, a method, and a computerized tool that together support the conceptual design of families of product/service systems (PSSs). First, a PSS family model is presented and then implemented as an add-on to an existing computer-aided design (CAD) tool. Next, a method building upon the model and lean principles is developed as a design procedure. The software and the method are verified through an industrial example of designing a family of logistic services. The proposed model, method, and tool were found effective for describing different key elements of PSS family design. The power of the CAD tool was also demonstrated by taking advantage of a database of model building blocks and semi-automatic calculations.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomohiko Sakao & Tatsunori Hara & Ryo Fukushima, 2020. "Using Product/Service-System Family Design for Efficient Customization with Lean Principles: Model, Method, and Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-25, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:14:p:5779-:d:386104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5779/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5779/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berman, Barry, 2011. "Strategies to reduce product proliferation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 551-561.
    2. Tomohiko Sakao & Abhijna Neramballi, 2020. "A Product/Service System Design Schema: Application to Big Data Analytics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Fahimnia, Behnam & Sarkis, Joseph & Eshragh, Ali, 2015. "A tradeoff model for green supply chain planning:A leanness-versus-greenness analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 173-190.
    4. Wolfgang Ulaga & Werner Reinartz, 2011. "Hybrid Offerings: How Manufacturing Firms Combine Goods and Services Successfully," Post-Print hal-00642039, HAL.
    5. Barry L. Bayus & William P. Putsis, Jr., 1999. "Product Proliferation: An Empirical Analysis of Product Line Determinants and Market Outcomes," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 137-153.
    6. Vladimir Modrak & Zuzana Soltysova & Jan Modrak & Annamaria Behunova, 2017. "Reducing Impact of Negative Complexity on Sustainability of Mass Customization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Kumar, Maneesh & Rodrigues, Vasco Sanchez, 2020. "Synergetic effect of lean and green on innovation: A resource-based perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 469-479.
    8. Johannes Matschewsky & Marianna Lena Kambanou & Tomohiko Sakao, 2018. "Designing and providing integrated product-service systems – challenges, opportunities and solutions resulting from prescriptive approaches in two industrial companies," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(6), pages 2150-2168, March.
    9. Tomohiko Sakao & Mario Fargnoli, 2010. "Customization in Ecodesign," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 14(4), pages 529-532, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mario Fargnoli & Nicolas Haber & Massimo Tronci, 2022. "Case Study Research to Foster the Optimization of Supply Chain Management through the PSS Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Nicolas Haber & Mario Fargnoli, 2021. "Sustainable Product-Service Systems Customization: A Case Study Research in the Medical Equipment Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolas Haber & Mario Fargnoli, 2021. "Sustainable Product-Service Systems Customization: A Case Study Research in the Medical Equipment Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Dertwinkel-Kalt, Markus & Wey, Christian, 2020. "Multi-product bargaining, bundling, and buyer power," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Yanhui Zhao & Yufei Zhang & Joyce (Feng) Wang & Wyatt A. Schrock & Roger J. Calantone, 2020. "Brand relevance and the effects of product proliferation across product categories," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 1192-1210, November.
    4. Tomohiko Sakao & Abhijna Neramballi, 2020. "A Product/Service System Design Schema: Application to Big Data Analytics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Chirumalla, Koteshwar & Leoni, Luna & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2023. "Moving from servitization to digital servitization: Identifying the required dynamic capabilities and related microfoundations to facilitate the transition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Wei‐Lin Wang & Demetrios Vakratsas, 2021. "The Dual Impact of Product Line Length on Consumer Choice," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 3054-3072, September.
    7. Alhamzah Alnoor & Khai Wah Khaw & XinYing Chew & Sammar Abbas & Zeeshan Zaib Khattak, 2023. "The Influence of the Barriers of Hybrid Strategy on Strategic Competitive Priorities: Evidence from Oil Companies," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(2), pages 179-198, June.
    8. Anna Adamik & Michał Nowicki, 2019. "Pathologies and Paradoxes of Co-Creation: A Contribution to the Discussion about Corporate Social Responsibility in Building a Competitive Advantage in the Age of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-38, September.
    9. Dominik M. Wielgos & Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl, 2021. "Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 762-789, July.
    10. Dirk Crass & Franz Schwiebacher, 2017. "The importance of trademark protection for product differentiation and innovation," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 44(2), pages 199-220, June.
    11. Claudio Giachetti & Giovanni Battista Dagnino, 2014. "Detecting the relationship between competitive intensity and firm product line length: Evidence from the worldwide mobile phone industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(9), pages 1398-1409, September.
    12. Minha Hwang & Bart J. Bronnenberg & Raphael Thomadsen, 2010. "An Empirical Analysis of Assortment Similarities Across U.S. Supermarkets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 858-879, 09-10.
    13. Mayank Aggarwal & Anindya S. Chakrabarti & Chirantan Chatterjee, 2023. "Movies, stigma and choice: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 1019-1039, May.
    14. Siri Jagstedt & Magnus Persson, 2019. "Using Platform Strategies In The Development Of Integrated Product-Service Solutions," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 1-36, May.
    15. Deprez, Laurens & Antonio, Katrien & Boute, Robert, 2021. "Pricing service maintenance contracts using predictive analytics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 530-545.
    16. Rönnberg Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Capability configurations for advanced service offerings in manufacturing firms: Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5330-5335.
    17. Rajshree Agarwal & Barry L. Bayus, 2002. "The Market Evolution and Sales Takeoff of Product Innovations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(8), pages 1024-1041, August.
    18. Hongtao Ren & Wenji Zhou & Marek Makowski & Hongbin Yan & Yadong Yu & Tieju Ma, 2021. "Incorporation of life cycle emissions and carbon price uncertainty into the supply chain network management of PVC production," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 601-620, May.
    19. Maike Müller & Dirk Stegelmeyer & Rakesh Mishra, 2023. "Development of an augmented reality remote maintenance adoption model through qualitative analysis of success factors," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1490-1519, September.
    20. Wallace J. Hopp & Xiaowei Xu, 2005. "Product Line Selection and Pricing with Modularity in Design," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 172-187, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:14:p:5779-:d:386104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.