IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i14p5542-d382301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybrid Logical Security Framework for Privacy Preservation in the Green Internet of Things

Author

Listed:
  • Isha Batra

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, India)

  • Sahil Verma

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, India)

  • Arun Malik

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, India)

  • Kavita

    (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, India)

  • Uttam Ghosh

    (Department of EECS, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA)

  • Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues

    (Post-Graduation Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Piauí (UFPI), Teresina 64049-550, Brazil
    Covilhã Delegation, Instituto de Telecomunicações, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Gia Nhu Nguyen

    (Graduate School, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
    Faculty of Information Technology, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam)

  • A. S. M. Sanwar Hosen

    (Division of Computer Science and Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea)

  • Vinayagam Mariappan

    (Advanced R&D Department, SMR Automotive Modules, Bucheon 14556, Korea)

Abstract

Lately, the Internet of Things (IoT) has opened up new opportunities to business and enterprises; however, the cost of providing security and privacy best practices is preventing numerous organizations from adopting this innovation. With the proliferation of connecting devices in IoT, significant increases have been recorded in energy use, harmful contamination and e-waste. A new paradigm of green IoT is aimed at designing environmentally friendly protocols by reducing the carbon impact and promote efficient techniques for energy use. There is a consistent effort of designing distinctive security structures to address vulnerabilities and attacks. However, most of the existing schemes are not energy efficient. To bridge the gap, we propose the hybrid logical security framework (HLSF), which offers authentication and data confidentiality in IoT. HLSF uses a lightweight cryptographic mechanism for unique authentication. It enhances the level of security and provides better network functionalities using energy-efficient schemes. With extensive simulation, we compare HLSF with two existing popular security schemes, namely, constrained application protocol (CoAP) and object security architecture for IoT (OSCAR). The result shows that HLSF outperforms CoAP and OSCAR in terms of throughput with low computational, storage and energy overhead, even in the presence of attackers.

Suggested Citation

  • Isha Batra & Sahil Verma & Arun Malik & Kavita & Uttam Ghosh & Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues & Gia Nhu Nguyen & A. S. M. Sanwar Hosen & Vinayagam Mariappan, 2020. "Hybrid Logical Security Framework for Privacy Preservation in the Green Internet of Things," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:14:p:5542-:d:382301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5542/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/14/5542/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elisabete Correia & Helena Carvalho & Susana G. Azevedo & Kannan Govindan, 2017. "Maturity Models in Supply Chain Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Vipindev Adat & B. B. Gupta, 2018. "Security in Internet of Things: issues, challenges, taxonomy, and architecture," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 423-441, March.
    3. Weian Li & Jian Xu & Minna Zheng, 2018. "Green Governance: New Perspective from Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulina Golinska-Dawson & Karolina Werner-Lewandowska & Monika Kosacka-Olejnik, 2021. "Responsible Resource Management in Remanufacturing—Framework for Qualitative Assessment in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Inês A. Ferreira & Radu Godina & Helena Carvalho, 2020. "Waste Valorization through Additive Manufacturing in an Industrial Symbiosis Setting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Wei Hu & Jingsong Liu, 2023. "The Coupling and Coordination of Urban Modernization and Low-Carbon Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Jianfei Zhao & Anan Pongtornkulpanich & Wenjin Cheng, 2022. "The Impact of Board Size on Green Innovation in China’s Heavily Polluting Enterprises: The Mediating Role of Innovation Openness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Runhui Lin & Yuan Gui & Zaiyang Xie & Lu Liu, 2019. "Green Governance and International Business Strategies of Emerging Economies’ Multinational Enterprises: A Multiple-Case Study of Chinese Firms in Pollution-Intensive Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-32, February.
    6. Mai Hisham Haroun Montasser & Islam El-Nakeeb, 2017. "Investigating Solid Waste Supply Chain: A Proposed Framework forAchieving the Environmental Sustainability Case study Alexandria,Egypt," International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs (IJBEA), Sana N. Maswadeh, vol. 2(3), pages 165-172.
    7. Mathias Cöster & Gunnar Dahlin & Raine Isaksson, 2020. "Are They Reporting the Right Thing and Are They Doing It Right?—A Measurement Maturity Grid for Evaluation of Sustainability Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Xiaolin Li & Weian Li & Yaowei Zhang, 2020. "Family Control, Political Connection, and Corporate Green Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Yuming Zhang & Juanjuan Zhang & Zhang Cheng, 2021. "Stock Market Liberalization and Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Lixiang Wang & Weian Li & Lujun Qi, 2020. "Stakeholder Pressures and Corporate Environmental Strategies: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Han Long & Gen-Fu Feng & Chun-Ping Chang, 2023. "How does ESG performance promote corporate green innovation?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2889-2913, August.
    12. Zhu, Bo & Zhao, Yue, 2022. "Carbon risk and the cost of bank loans: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    13. Pavan Manocha & Jagjit Singh Srai, 2020. "Exploring Environmental Supply Chain Innovation in M&A," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Kumar Prateek & Nitish Kumar Ojha & Fahiem Altaf & Soumyadev Maity, 2023. "Quantum secured 6G technology-based applications in Internet of Everything," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 82(2), pages 315-344, February.
    15. Kangning Liu & Yikun Su & Shoujian Zhang, 2018. "Evaluating Supplier Management Maturity in Prefabricated Construction Project-Survey Analysis in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Davidson de Almeida Santos & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas & Carlos Francisco Simões Gomes & Luis Perez Zotes & Sérgio Luiz Braga França & Guilherme Vinagre Pinto de Souza & Robson Amarante de Araújo, 2020. "Proposal for a Maturity Model in Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-37, November.
    17. Syed Quaid Ali Shah & Fong-Woon Lai & Muhammad Kashif Shad & Zdeňka Konečná & Feybi Ariani Goni & Abdoulmohammad Gholamzadeh Chofreh & Jiří Jaromír Klemeš, 2021. "The Inclusion of Intellectual Capital into the Green Board Committee to Enhance Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    18. Xin-Jie Zhang & Yong Tang & Jason Xiong & Wei-Jia Wang & Yi-Cheng Zhang, 2018. "Dynamics of Cooperation in Minority Games in Alliance Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Jun-Feng Tian & Hao-Ning Wang, 2020. "An efficient and secure data auditing scheme based on fog-to-cloud computing for Internet of things scenarios," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(5), pages 15501477209, May.
    20. Eric Forcael & Isabella Ferrari & Alexander Opazo-Vega & Jesús Alberto Pulido-Arcas, 2020. "Construction 4.0: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-28, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:14:p:5542-:d:382301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.