IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i13p5335-d379100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitive Priorities, Employee Management and Development and Sustainable Manufacturing Performance in Asian Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Dotun Adebanjo

    (Business School, University of Greenwich, London SE10 9LS, UK)

  • Pei-Lee Teh

    (School of Business, Monash University Malaysia, Selangor Darul Ehsan 47500, Malaysia)

  • Pervaiz K Ahmed

    (School of Business, Monash University Malaysia, Selangor Darul Ehsan 47500, Malaysia)

  • Erhan Atay

    (School of Business, Monash University Malaysia, Selangor Darul Ehsan 47500, Malaysia)

  • Peter Ractham

    (Thammasat Business School, Thammasat University, Bangkok 10200, Thailand)

Abstract

This study investigates the relationships between three dimensions of competitive priorities (customer focus, product innovation and delivery) and how Asian manufacturers manage and develop their employees and the consequent effect on sustainable manufacturing performance. Three dimensions of manufacturing performance are considered in this study—quality performance, production flexibility and operations cost. This study uses 259 datasets collected from manufacturers in four Asian countries. Structural equation modeling and mediation analysis are performed to test the relationships. Results show that there is a significant positive and mediating relationship between the competitive priority of product innovation, employee management and development, quality performance, production flexibility and operation cost. However, such significant relationships do not exist with competitive priorities of customer focus and delivery. Organizations are constantly faced with the problem of determining which competitive priorities to focus on. However, different competitive priorities have different effects on how the employees are managed and developed, and ultimately, on organizational performance and competitiveness. There is a need to focus on innovation-led strategies that relate to sustainable outcomes. This is one of the first studies in Asia to understand the multilateral relationships between different competitive priorities and different performance dimensions when employee management and development intermediate.

Suggested Citation

  • Dotun Adebanjo & Pei-Lee Teh & Pervaiz K Ahmed & Erhan Atay & Peter Ractham, 2020. "Competitive Priorities, Employee Management and Development and Sustainable Manufacturing Performance in Asian Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:13:p:5335-:d:379100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/13/5335/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/13/5335/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Samar Ali, Sadia, 2015. "Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 120-132.
    2. Forza, Cipriano & Filippini, Roberto, 1998. "TQM impact on quality conformance and customer satisfaction: A causal model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Hallgren, Mattias & Olhager, Jan, 2009. "Flexibility configurations: Empirical analysis of volume and product mix flexibility," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 746-756, August.
    4. Yen, HsiuJu Rebecca & Sheu, Chwen, 2004. "Aligning ERP implementation with competitive priorities of manufacturing firms: An exploratory study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 207-220, December.
    5. Cai, Shaohan & Yang, Zhilin, 2014. "On the relationship between business environment and competitive priorities: The role of performance frontiers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 131-145.
    6. Mohamed Abubakr & Adel T. Abbas & Italo Tomaz & Mahmoud S. Soliman & Monis Luqman & Hussien Hegab, 2020. "Sustainable and Smart Manufacturing: An Integrated Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Bashaer Almatrooshi & Sanjay Kumar Singh & Sherine Farouk, 2016. "Determinants of organizational performance: a proposed framework," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 65(6), pages 844-859, July.
    8. Yang Liu & Liting Liang, 2015. "Evaluating and developing resource-based operations strategy for competitive advantage: an exploratory study of Finnish high-tech manufacturing industries," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(4), pages 1019-1037, February.
    9. Woo, York Y. & Hsu, Shu-Lu & Wu, Soushan, 2001. "An integrated inventory model for a single vendor and multiple buyers with ordering cost reduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 203-215, October.
    10. Jeffrey G. Miller & Aleda V. Roth, 1994. "A Taxonomy of Manufacturing Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 285-304, March.
    11. Lee, Voon-Hsien & Ooi, Keng-Boon & Chong, Alain Yee-Loong & Sohal, Amrik, 2018. "The effects of supply chain management on technological innovation: The mediating role of guanxi," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 15-29.
    12. Chiradip Bandyopadhyay & Kailash B. L. Srivastava, 2020. "HR signals in the context of HRM-firm performance relationship: development of a conceptual framework," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 70(2), pages 376-390, April.
    13. Olivia Guillon & Cécile Cézanne, 2014. "Employee Loyalty and Organizational Performance: A Critical Survey," Post-Print halshs-01340477, HAL.
    14. Carranza, Juan Esteban, 2010. "Product innovation and adoption in market equilibrium: The case of digital cameras," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 604-618, November.
    15. Zailani, Suhaiza & Jeyaraman, K. & Vengadasan, G. & Premkumar, R., 2012. "Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: A survey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 330-340.
    16. Ren, Shengce & Eisingerich, Andreas B. & Tsai, Huei-ting, 2015. "Search scope and innovation performance of emerging-market firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 102-108.
    17. Muhammad Imran Qureshi & Rajah A/l Rasiah & Basheer M. Al-Ghazali & Maqsood Haider & Hanifah Jambari & Iswan & Sasmoko, 2019. "Modeling Work Practices under Socio-Technical Systems for Sustainable Manufacturing Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Indradevi R., 2010. "Training for Most Capable Workforce," Advances In Management, Advances in Management, vol. 3(12), December.
    19. Leong, G. K. & Snyder, D. L. & Ward, P. T., 1990. "Research in the process and content of manufacturing strategy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 109-122.
    20. Chaoyang Zhang & Zhengxu Wang & Kai Ding & Felix T.S. Chan & Weixi Ji, 2020. "An energy-aware cyber physical system for energy Big data analysis and recessive production anomalies detection in discrete manufacturing workshops," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(23), pages 7059-7077, December.
    21. Chan, Hing Kai & Yee, Rachel W.Y. & Dai, Jing & Lim, Ming K., 2016. "The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 384-391.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ardian Qorri & Saranda Gashi & Andrzej Kraslawski, 2021. "Performance outcomes of supply chain practices for sustainable development: A meta‐analysis of moderators," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 194-216, January.
    2. M. K. Dhillon & P. M. Rafi-Ul-Shan & H. Amar & F. Sher & S. Ahmed, 2023. "Flexible Green Supply Chain Management in Emerging Economies: A Systematic Literature Review," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(1), pages 1-28, March.
    3. Amoako-Gyampah, Kwasi & Acquaah, Moses, 2008. "Manufacturing strategy, competitive strategy and firm performance: An empirical study in a developing economy environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 575-592, February.
    4. Demeter, Krisztina & Szász, Levente, 2013. "Towards solution based thinking: characteristics of servitization at Hungarian manufacturing companies," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 18(3), pages 309-335.
    5. Amer Saeed & Yun Jun & Saviour Ayertey Nubuor & Hewawasam Puwakpitiyage Rasika Priyankara & Mahabaduge Prasad Fernando Jayasuriya, 2018. "Institutional Pressures, Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Environmental and Economic Performance: A Two Theory View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Xinwei Li & Wenjuan Zeng & Mao Xu, 2022. "The Moderating Role of IT Capability on Green Innovation and Ambidexterity: Towards a Corporate Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Subramanian, Nachiappan & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Gao, Yanan, 2016. "Innovative service satisfaction and customer promotion behaviour in the Chinese budget hotel: an empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 201-210.
    8. Cho, Young Sik & Linderman, Kevin, 2019. "Metacognition-based process improvement practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 132-144.
    9. Graça Miranda Silva & Paulo J. Gomes & Joseph Sarkis, 2019. "The role of innovation in the implementation of green supply chain management practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 819-832, July.
    10. Hisham Alidrisi, 2021. "Measuring the Environmental Maturity of the Supply Chain Finance: A Big Data-Based Multi-Criteria Perspective," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-24, April.
    11. Kai-Chong Thong & Wai-Peng Wong, 2018. "Pathways for Sustainable Supply Chain Performance—Evidence from a Developing Country, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, August.
    12. Ardito, Lorenzo & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Dezi, Luca & Castellano, Sylvaine, 2020. "The influence of inbound open innovation on ambidexterity performance: Does it pay to source knowledge from supply chain stakeholders?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 321-329.
    13. Hallgren, Mattias & Olhager, Jan, 2006. "Quantification in manufacturing strategy: A methodology and illustration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 113-124, November.
    14. Cherrafi, Anass & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Kumar, Vikas & Mishra, Nishikant & Ghobadian, Abby & Elfezazi, Said, 2018. "Lean, green practices and process innovation: A model for green supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 79-92.
    15. Pacheco, Diego Augusto de Jesus & Antunes Junior, José Antonio Valle & de Matos, Celso Augusto, 2021. "The constraints of theory: What is the impact of the Theory of Constraints on Operations Strategy?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    16. Miltenburg, John, 2008. "Setting manufacturing strategy for a factory-within-a-factory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 307-323, May.
    17. Ping Wang & Joan P. Mileski & Qingcheng Zeng, 2019. "Alignments between strategic content and process structure: the case of container terminal service process automation," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 21(4), pages 543-558, December.
    18. José Roberto Mendoza-Fong & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & José Roberto Díaz-Reza & Emilio Jiménez-Macías & Julio Blanco-Fernández, 2019. "The Role of Green Attributes in Production Processes as Well as Their Impact on Operational, Commercial, and Economic Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, March.
    19. Geng, Ruoqi & Mansouri, S. Afshin & Aktas, Emel, 2017. "The relationship between green supply chain management and performance: A meta-analysis of empirical evidences in Asian emerging economies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 245-258.
    20. Rameshwar Dubey & Angappa Gunasekaran & Stephen J. Childe & Thanos Papadopoulos & Zongwei Luo & David Roubaud, 2020. "Upstream supply chain visibility and complexity effect on focal company’s sustainable performance: Indian manufacturers’ perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 343-367, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:13:p:5335-:d:379100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.