IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i12p4915-d372273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Växjö Municipality’s Planning Strategy to Increase the Construction of Wooden Multi-Family Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Fredrik Lindblad

    (Institution of Logistics, School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University, 351 95 Växjö, Sweden)

Abstract

Sweden has a housing shortage, which the Swedish authorities expect to continue until 2025. Producers of wooden multi-family buildings have a relatively small market share in comparison to traditional building materials. The limited capacity to fulfil the increased building demand also restricts the possibilities for development towards innovation, bio-economy and sustainability. The municipalities in Sweden have responsibility for the planning of the building development in their region based on their projected requirements and strategies. Combining this with a desire to develop sustainable building solutions based on wood increases the complexity. Currently, public building developments are achieved through the public procurement act or the land allocation activity, dependent on their development strategy. This normally involves the development of local strategies regarding, for example, design, material choice and geographical development. This study aims to identify drivers that will enable improved market activities related to actions in public building initiatives using wood-based solutions, which is conducted by studying a specific building project managed by the Växjö Municipality in Sweden. The result indicates that improved transparency in the land allocation activity generates possibilities for developers to respond successfully to the requests submitted by the municipalities, and thus, increase the possible use of sustainable building methods using wood. This knowledge improves the understanding of the required strategic development for the companies, the government and the municipalities, to increase the use of sustainable building materials in Swedish multi-family housing projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Fredrik Lindblad, 2020. "Växjö Municipality’s Planning Strategy to Increase the Construction of Wooden Multi-Family Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:4915-:d:372273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4915/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/4915/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Carmona, 2009. "Sustainable urban design: principles to practice," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 48-77.
    2. Marie A. McKendall & John A. Wagner, 1997. "Motive, Opportunity, Choice, and Corporate Illegality," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(6), pages 624-647, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dildar Hussain & Marijana Sreckovic & Josef Windsperger, 2018. "An organizational capability perspective on multi-unit franchising," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 717-727, April.
    2. Victoria Maruanova Mareeva & Ahmad Mohammad Ahmad & M. Salim Ferwati & Shaibu Bala Garba, 2022. "Sustainable Urban Regeneration of Blighted Neighborhoods: The Case of Al Ghanim Neighborhood, Doha, Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Daphne W. Yiu & Yuehua Xu & William P. Wan, 2014. "The Deterrence Effects of Vicarious Punishments on Corporate Financial Fraud," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1549-1571, October.
    4. Del Bosco, Barbara & Misani, Nicola, 2011. "Keeping the enemies close: The contribution of corporate social responsibility to reducing crime against the firm," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 87-98, March.
    5. Seyda Akcali & Arzu Cahantimur, 2022. "The Pentagon Model of Urban Social Sustainability: An Assessment of Sociospatial Aspects, Comparing Two Neighborhoods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Tobias Karmann & René Mauer & Tessa C. Flatten & Malte Brettel, 2016. "Entrepreneurial Orientation and Corruption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 223-234, January.
    7. Ilir Hajdini, 2024. "Multiple control strategies and franchisor performance: Performance effects of authoritative, contractual, and relational control mechanisms," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(3), pages 875-904, September.
    8. Dawson, Alexandra & Ginesti, Gianluca & Sciascia, Salvatore, 2020. "Family-related antecedents of business legality: An empirical investigation among Italian family owned SMEs," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 11(1).
    9. Griessmair, Michele & Hussain, Dildar & Windsperger, Josef, 2014. "Trust and the tendency towards multi-unit franchising: A relational governance view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2337-2345.
    10. Noman Shaheer & Jingtao Yi & Sali Li & Liang Chen, 2019. "State-Owned Enterprises as Bribe Payers: The Role of Institutional Environment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 221-238, September.
    11. Shripad Pendse, 2012. "Ethical Hazards: A Motive, Means, and Opportunity Approach to Curbing Corporate Unethical Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 265-279, May.
    12. Qinqin Zheng & Yadong Luo & Stephanie Wang, 2014. "Moral Degradation, Business Ethics, and Corporate Social Responsibility in a Transitional Economy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 405-421, March.
    13. Yongqiang Gao & Haibin Yang, 2021. "Does Ownership Matter? Firm Ownership and Corporate Illegality in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 431-445, January.
    14. Abbas Ziafati Bafarasat, 2023. "Strategic urban design for sustainable development: A framework for studio and practice," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1861-1872, June.
    15. Brian L. Connelly & Wei Shi & Jinyong Zyung, 2017. "Managerial response to constitutional constraints on shareholder power," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(7), pages 1499-1517, July.
    16. Carole L. Jurkiewicz & Robert A. Giacalone, 2016. "Organizational Determinants of Ethical Dysfunctionality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 1-12, June.
    17. Gazley, Aaron & Sinha, Ashish & Rod, Michel, 2016. "Toward a theory of marketing law transgressions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 476-483.
    18. Gao, Yongqiang & Yang, Haibin & Zhang, Miaohan, 2021. "Too bad to fear, too good to dare? Performance feedback and corporate misconduct," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1-11.
    19. Michael Hadani, 2021. "The Reputational Costs of Corporate Litigation: Long-Term Media Reputation Damages to Firms’ Involvement in Litigation," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(4), pages 234-246, November.
    20. Frederic Läger & Yassin Denis Bouzzine & Rainer Lueg, 2022. "The relationship between firm complexity and corporate social responsibility: International evidence from 2010–2019," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 549-560, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:4915-:d:372273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.