IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i10p4142-d360017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Influence Factors on the Reputation of Food-Delivery Companies: Evidence from Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Nicoleta Dospinescu

    (Department of Management, Marketing and Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, 700506 Iasi, Romania)

  • Octavian Dospinescu

    (Department of Accounting, Business Information Systems and Statistics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, 700506 Iasi, Romania)

  • Maria Tatarusanu

    (Department of Management, Marketing and Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, 700506 Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

In contemporary economies, reputation has become a very important factor for companies that interact directly with customers. In this context, food-delivery companies must take into account the risks associated with reputation when making operational or investment decisions. Knowing the factors that influence the perception of reputation becomes a competitive advantage for improving or even eliminating the risks related to these indicators. The aim of the study was to explain the influence level and the contribution of influence factors on the reputation of food-delivery companies in Romania. The research analyzed data from 152 respondents who are food-delivery customers from Romania, considering nine possible influencing factors. The data were analyzed in SPSS and the multivariate linear regression analysis and the multivariate analysis of variance were used. The results showed a significant relationship between the perception of reputation and influencing factors such as the quality of the food delivered, the price of the food-delivery service, the variety of the menu, the taste of the food, the perception of companions, and the quality of the electronic application. Our research only partially confirmed certain socio-demographic influences on the perception of reputation. The limitations of the research are determined by the region related to Romania and by the number of socio-demographic variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicoleta Dospinescu & Octavian Dospinescu & Maria Tatarusanu, 2020. "Analysis of the Influence Factors on the Reputation of Food-Delivery Companies: Evidence from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4142-:d:360017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4142/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/10/4142/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastien Pouliot & Daniel A. Sumner, 2013. "Traceability, recalls, industry reputation and product safety," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 40(1), pages 121-142, February.
    2. Correa, Juan C. & Garzón, Wilmer & Brooker, Phillip & Sakarkar, Gopal & Carranza, Steven A. & Yunado, Leidy & Rincón, Alejandro, 2019. "Evaluation of collaborative consumption of food delivery services through web mining techniques," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 45-50.
    3. Fulponi, Linda, 2006. "Private voluntary standards in the food system: The perspective of major food retailers in OECD countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Park, Eunil, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility as a determinant of corporate reputation in the airline industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 215-221.
    5. Sandro Castaldo & Francesco Perrini & Nicola Misani & Antonio Tencati, 2009. "The Missing Link Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer Trust: The Case of Fair Trade Products," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Longinos Marin & Salvador Ruiz & Alicia Rubio, 2009. "The Role of Identity Salience in the Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 65-78, January.
    7. Kim, Jae, 2015. "How to Choose the Level of Significance: A Pedagogical Note," MPRA Paper 66373, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Yeo, Vincent Cheow Sern & Goh, See-Kwong & Rezaei, Sajad, 2017. "Consumer experiences, attitude and behavioral intention toward online food delivery (OFD) services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 150-162.
    9. Valentin Niţă & Daniela Tatiana Agheorghiesei, 2010. "The Perception of the Students Specializing Trade, Tourism and Services on the Importance of the Concept of Sustainable Development in Commercial Activities," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(27), pages 66-82, February.
    10. Sabina-Cristiana Necula & Vasile-Daniel Păvăloaia & Cătălin Strîmbei & Octavian Dospinescu, 2018. "Enhancement of E-Commerce Websites with Semantic Web Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Park, Jongchul & Lee, Hanjoon & Kim, Chankon, 2014. "Corporate social responsibilities, consumer trust and corporate reputation: South Korean consumers' perspectives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 295-302.
    12. Diana Corina Gligor-Cimpoieru & Valentin Partenie Munteanu & Renata Dana Nițu-Antonie & Andreia Schneider & Gheorghe Preda, 2017. "Perceptions of Future Employees toward CSR Environmental Practices in Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Jinsoo Hwang & Hyunjoon Kim, 2019. "Consequences of a green image of drone food delivery services: The moderating role of gender and age," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 872-884, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nurul Labanihuda Abdull Rahman, 2022. "A Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Online Food Delivery by Using Scopus Database ," GATR Journals jmmr303, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    2. Jonghan Ko & Jaeil Cho & Jinsil Choi & Chang-Yong Yoon & Kyu-Nam An & Jong-Oh Ban & Dong-Kwan Kim, 2021. "Simulation of Crop Yields Grown under Agro-Photovoltaic Panels: A Case Study in Chonnam Province, South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Daniel Kaimann, 2020. "Behind the Review Curtain: Decomposition of Online Consumer Ratings in Peer-to-Peer Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Alexandru Tugui & Daniela Tatiana Agheorghiesei & Laura Asandului, 2020. "An Informal Ethics Auditing in Authorized Valuation for Business Sustainability in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-26, October.
    5. Ariful Islam & Adil Mansoor & Mostafizur Rahman & Sazali Abd Wahab, 2020. "Adjusting A Strategic Cash-Flow Model For Bangladeshi Small And Medium Enterprises: The Art Of Surviving Covid-19 Emergency," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(5), pages 194-213, October.
    6. Ngoc Bao Tu Nguyen & Gu-Hong Lin & Thanh-Tuan Dang, 2021. "A Two Phase Integrated Fuzzy Decision-Making Framework for Green Supplier Selection in the Coffee Bean Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-22, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Burlea-Schiopoiu, Adriana & Puiu, Silvia & Dinu, Adina, 2022. "The impact of food delivery applications on Romanian consumers’ behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    2. Rama Shankar Yadav & Sanket Sunand Dash & Shreyashi Chakraborty & Manoj Kumar, 2018. "Perceived CSR and Corporate Reputation: The Mediating Role of Employee Trust," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 43(3), pages 139-151, September.
    3. María Dolores Aledo‐Ruiz & Eva Martínez‐Caro & José Manuel Santos‐Jaén, 2022. "The influence of corporate social responsibility on students' emotional appeal in the HEIs: The mediating effect of reputation and corporate image," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 578-592, May.
    4. Francesco Perrini & Angeloantonio Russo & Antonio Tencati & Clodia Vurro, 2011. "Deconstructing the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 59-76, March.
    5. Shu Wang & Ying-Kai Liao & Wann-Yih Wu & Khanh Bao Ho Le, 2021. "The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions in Brand Equity, Brand Credibility, Brand Reputation, and Purchase Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Muflih, Muhammad, 2021. "The link between corporate social responsibility and customer loyalty: Empirical evidence from the Islamic banking industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    7. Stanisavljević Milena, 2017. "Does Customer Loyalty Depend on Corporate Social Responsibility?," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 63(1), pages 38-46, March.
    8. Mobin Fatma & Zillur Rahman, 2016. "Consumer responses to CSR in Indian banking sector," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 13(3), pages 203-222, October.
    9. Han-Shen Chen & Chia-Hsing Liang & Shu-Yi Liao & Hung-Yu Kuo, 2020. "Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions toward Food Delivery Platform Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Shankar, Amit & Dhir, Amandeep & Talwar, Shalini & Islam, Nazrul & Sharma, Piyush, 2022. "Balancing food waste and sustainability goals in online food delivery: Towards a comprehensive conceptual framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    11. Subhajit Bhattacharya, 2017. "Does corporate social responsibility contribute to strengthen brand equity? An empirical study," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 14(4), pages 513-533, December.
    12. George Thomas, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility as a Sustainable Business Practice: A Study among Generation Z Customers of Indian Luxury Hotels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Tsai, Pei-Hsuan & Chen, Chih-Jou & Hsiao, Wei-Hung & Lin, Chin-Tsai, 2023. "Factors influencing the consumers’ behavioural intention to use online food delivery service: Empirical evidence from Taiwan," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    14. Stanisavljević, Milena, 2016. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Loyalty," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2016), Rovinj, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Rovinj, Croatia, 8-9 September 2016, pages 434-439, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    15. Francisco Javier Forcadell & Elisa Aracil, 2017. "European Banks' Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Moazzam Abbas & Yongqiang Gao & Sayyed Sadaqat Hussain Shah, 2018. "CSR and Customer Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Customer Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Yuan Tian & Chiako Hung & Peter Frumkin, 2020. "An experimental test of the impact of corporate social responsibility on consumers' purchasing behavior: The mediation role of trust," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2972-2982, November.
    18. repec:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:51:p:422 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Vohra, Shalini & Davies, Gary, 2020. "Investor regret, share performance and the role of corporate agreeableness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 306-315.
    20. Talwar, Shalini & Dhir, Amandeep & Scuotto, Veronica & Kaur, Puneet, 2021. "Barriers and paradoxical recommendation behaviour in online to offline (O2O) services. A convergent mixed-method study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 25-39.
    21. Yoori Yang & Cynthia Stohl, 2020. "The (in)congruence of measures of corporate social responsibility performance and stakeholder measures of corporate social responsibility reputation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 969-981, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:10:p:4142-:d:360017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.