IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i7p1936-d219004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Guided High-Quality Development, Resources, and Environmental Forcing in China’s Green Development

Author

Listed:
  • Zhengda Li

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Wanping Yang

    (School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)

  • Chengjun Wang

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Yuesheng Zhang

    (School of Management, Xinxiang University, Xinxiang 453003, China)

  • Xiaoling Yuan

    (School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)

Abstract

High-quality guided development and environmental forcing are two routes for China’s green development, and each has different focuses and outcomes. The aim of this study is to clarify coordinated mechanisms to reveal the reasons and determine paths for China’s green development. A research framework for synergetic evolution is established, and the Haken model is applied to analyze the different effects of high-quality development that guide resource- and environmental-forcing mechanisms. This research showed that: (1) the preferred route and key factor in China’s green development is high-quality developmental guidance; (2) high-quality development and environmental-forcing mechanisms are non-coordinated, and while the former might coordinate with the latter, the latter does not; (3) mutual promotion of high-quality developmental guidance and the resource mechanism was not observed; (4) the critical point coordinated value is 0.5686 for China’s green development. Eastern China possesses a relatively high level of green development, while the north, east, west, and central areas of the country still have much progress to make.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhengda Li & Wanping Yang & Chengjun Wang & Yuesheng Zhang & Xiaoling Yuan, 2019. "Guided High-Quality Development, Resources, and Environmental Forcing in China’s Green Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1936-:d:219004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1936/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1936/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhijun Feng & Wei Chen, 2018. "Environmental Regulation, Green Innovation, and Industrial Green Development: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Spatial Durbin Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Yanhong Liu & Xinjian Huang & Weiliang Chen, 2019. "Threshold Effect of High-Tech Industrial Scale on Green Development—Evidence from Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Fesselmeyer, Eric, 2018. "The value of green certification in the Singapore housing market," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 36-39.
    4. Ingrid Ott & Susanne Soretz, 2018. "Green Attitude and Economic Growth," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 70(4), pages 757-779, August.
    5. Ki‐Hoon Lee & Ji‐Whan Kim, 2011. "Integrating Suppliers into Green Product Innovation Development: an Empirical Case Study in the Semiconductor Industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(8), pages 527-538, December.
    6. Jingjing Zhang & Partha Gangopadhyay, 2015. "Dynamics of environmental quality and economic development: the regional experience from Yangtze River Delta of China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(29), pages 3113-3123, June.
    7. Seongho Kang & Won‐Moo Hur, 2012. "Investigating the Antecedents of Green Brand Equity: A Sustainable Development Perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5), pages 306-316, September.
    8. Markandya, Anil & González-Eguino, Mikel & Escapa, Marta, 2013. "From shadow to green: Linking environmental fiscal reforms and the informal economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(S1), pages 108-118.
    9. Mekala, Gayathri Devi & Hatton MacDonald, Darla, 2018. "Lost in Transactions: Analysing the Institutional Arrangements Underpinning Urban Green Infrastructure," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 399-409.
    10. Fabrizi, Andrea & Guarini, Giulio & Meliciani, Valentina, 2018. "Green patents, regulatory policies and research network policies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1018-1031.
    11. Min Wang & Xianli Zhao & Qunxi Gong & Zhigeng Ji, 2019. "Measurement of Regional Green Economy Sustainable Development Ability Based on Entropy Weight-Topsis-Coupling Coordination Degree—A Case Study in Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    12. Qing Yang & Yang Ding & Bauke De Vries & Qi Han & Huimin Ma, 2014. "Assessing Regional Sustainability Using a Model of Coordinated Development Index: A Case Study of Mainland China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Onuoha, Iheanyichukwu Joachim & Aliagha, Godwin Uche & Rahman, Mohd Shahril Abdul, 2018. "Modelling the effects of green building incentives and green building skills on supply factors affecting green commercial property investment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 814-823.
    14. Gouvea, Raul & Kassicieh, Sul & Montoya, M.J.R., 2013. "Using the quadruple helix to design strategies for the green economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 221-230.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Zhengda & Zheng, Chengxin & Liu, Aimin & Yang, Yang & Yuan, Xiaoling, 2022. "Environmental taxes, green subsidies, and cleaner production willingness: Evidence from China's publicly traded companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    2. Wang, Hai & Chen, Hui & Ye, Shuai & Yin, Junya, 2024. "The impact of green finance on companies’ overcapacity: Evidence from green financial reform and innovation policy in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1320-1336.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianfei Zhao & Anan Pongtornkulpanich & Wenjin Cheng, 2022. "The Impact of Board Size on Green Innovation in China’s Heavily Polluting Enterprises: The Mediating Role of Innovation Openness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Meiling Wang & Silu Pang & Ikram Hmani & Ilham Hmani & Cunfang Li & Zhengxia He, 2021. "Towards sustainable development: How does technological innovation drive the increase in green total factor productivity?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 217-227, January.
    3. Enrique Acebo & José‐Ángel Miguel‐Dávila & Mariano Nieto, 2021. "External stakeholder engagement: Complementary and substitutive effects on firms' eco‐innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2671-2687, July.
    4. Hongge Zhu & Zhenhuan Chen & Shaopeng Zhang & Wencheng Zhao, 2022. "The Role of Government Innovation Support in the Process of Urban Green Sustainable Development: A Spatial Difference-in-Difference Analysis Based on China’s Innovative City Pilot Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Huaxi Yuan & Yidai Feng & Jay Lee & Haimeng Liu, 2020. "The Spatio-Temporal Heterogeneity of Financial Agglomeration on Green Development in China Cities Using GTWR Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Valeria Costantini & Francesco Crespi & Giovanni Marin & Elena Paglialunga, 2016. "Eco-innovation, sustainable supply chains and environmental performance in European industries," LEM Papers Series 2016/19, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    7. Chin‐jung Luan & Chengli Tien & Pei‐hua Wu, 2013. "Strategizing Environmental Policy and Compliance for Firm Economic Sustainability: Evidence from Taiwanese Electronics Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(8), pages 517-546, December.
    8. Lingzhang Kong & Jinye Li, 2022. "Digital Economy Development and Green Economic Efficiency: Evidence from Province-Level Empirical Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, December.
    9. Kara, Karahan & Yalçın, Galip Cihan & Akagün Ergin, Elif & Simic, Vladimir & Pamucar, Dragan, 2024. "A neutrosophic WENSLO-ARLON model for measuring sustainable brand equity performance," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    10. Ke Liu & Yurong Qiao & Qian Zhou, 2021. "Analysis of China’s Industrial Green Development Efficiency and Driving Factors: Research Based on MGWR," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-22, April.
    11. Jinqiu He & Huiwen Su, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Green Innovation of Chinese Firms: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressure and International Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Xingwei Li & Jingru Li & Yicheng Huang & Jinrong He & Xiang Liu & Jiachi Dai & Qiong Shen, 2022. "Construction enterprises’ adoption of green development behaviors: an agent-based modeling approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Jia Peng & Xianli Hu & Xinyue Fan & Kai Wang & Hao Gong, 2023. "The Impact of the Green Economy on Carbon Emission Intensity: Comparisons, Challenges, and Mitigating Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Anna ARENT & Matylda BOJAR & Francisco DINIZ & Nelson DUARTE, 2015. "The Role Of Smes In Sustainable Regional Development And Local Business Integration: The Case Of Lublin Region (Poland)," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 23-34, December.
    15. Xueyang Wang & Xiumei Sun & Haotian Zhang & Chaokai Xue, 2022. "Digital Economy Development and Urban Green Innovation CA-Pability: Based on Panel Data of 274 Prefecture-Level Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Asif Khan & Chih-Cheng Chen & Kwanrat Suanpong & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Santhaya Kittikowit & Shih-Chih Chen, 2021. "The Impact of CSR on Sustainable Innovation Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Second-Order Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    17. Evangelista, Rui & Ramalho, Esmeralda A. & Andrade e Silva, João, 2020. "On the use of hedonic regression models to measure the effect of energy efficiency on residential property transaction prices: Evidence for Portugal and selected data issues," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Van Oijstaeijen, Wito & Van Passel, Steven & Back, Phil & Cools, Jan, 2022. "The politics of green infrastructure: A discrete choice experiment with Flemish local decision-makers," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    19. Zhao, Yang & Yongquan, Yang & Jian, Ma & Lu, Angela & Xuanhua, Xu, 2024. "Policy-induced cooperative knowledge network, university-industry collaboration and firm innovation: Evidence from the Greater Bay Area," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    20. Francesco Aiello & Paola Cardamone & Lidia Mannarino & Valeria Pupo, 2021. "Green patenting and corporate social responsibility: Does family involvement in business matter?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1386-1396, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1936-:d:219004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.