IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i7p1922-d218695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Ecological Policy of Kyrgyzstan Based on Data Envelope Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yun Hao

    (Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumchi 830011, China
    Institute of Resource and Environmental Science, Xinjiang University, Urumchi 830046, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    Center for Ecological and Environmental Studies in Central Asia, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumchi 830011, China)

  • Degang Yang

    (Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumchi 830011, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Jingjing Yin

    (Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumchi 830011, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Xi Chen

    (Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumchi 830011, China
    Center for Ecological and Environmental Studies in Central Asia, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumchi 830011, China)

  • Anming Bao

    (Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumchi 830011, China)

  • Miao Wu

    (Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumchi 830011, China)

  • Xiaoyun Zhang

    (Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumchi 830011, China)

Abstract

Kyrgyzstan is located in the runoff formation area of Aral Sea basin. The ecological protection of this country has a great effect on the downstream and Aral Sea conservation. There were a few studies about this region carried out from ecological policy aspects. The aim of this study was two-fold. First, we characterized the eco-policy system structure of Kyrgyzstan in different stages. It means the transition from “command and control” to “market-based” ecological policy. The priority of ecological policy was changed from “sustain economic growth and poverty reduction” to “sustainable development and green economy”. We then used a data envelope analysis method to evaluate the effects of eco-policy and government governance through eco-efficiency. The results are that (1) the eco-efficiency achieved the relative optimal state and the ecological policy obtained a relatively positive effect as a whole; (2) economic development promotes the protection of the ecological environment. It is the first time that quantitative method has been used to analyze the effects of ecological policy of Kyrgyzstan. The model results can reflect comprehensive effects of ecological policy in social, economic, and ecological aspects. This study provides a reference for those who want to shape the next generation of eco-environmental policies both in Kyrgyzstan and other Central Asian countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun Hao & Degang Yang & Jingjing Yin & Xi Chen & Anming Bao & Miao Wu & Xiaoyun Zhang, 2019. "The Effects of Ecological Policy of Kyrgyzstan Based on Data Envelope Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1922-:d:218695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1922/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1922/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shi, Kaifang & Yu, Bailang & Huang, Chang & Wu, Jianping & Sun, Xiufeng, 2018. "Exploring spatiotemporal patterns of electric power consumption in countries along the Belt and Road," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 847-859.
    2. Lu, Wen-Min & Kweh, Qian Long & Nourani, Mohammad & Huang, Feng-Wen, 2016. "Evaluating the efficiency of dual-use technology development programs from the R&D and socio-economic perspectives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 82-92.
    3. Per Andersen & Niels Christian Petersen, 1993. "A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1261-1264, October.
    4. Utkur Djanibekov & Grace B. Villamor & Klara Dzhakypbekova & James Chamberlain & Jianchu Xu, 2016. "Adoption of Sustainable Land Uses in Post-Soviet Central Asia: The Case for Agroforestry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Guo, I-Lung & Lee, Hsuan-Shih & Lee, Dan, 2017. "An integrated model for slack-based measure of super-efficiency in additive DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 160-167.
    6. Ulan Kasymov & Ahmad Hamidov, 2017. "Comparative Analysis of Nature-Related Transactions and Governance Structures in Pasture Use and Irrigation Water in Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Po-Chin Wu & Tzu-Hsien Huang & Sheng-Chieh Pan, 2014. "Country Performance Evaluation: The DEA Model Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 835-849, September.
    8. Magdalena Rybaczewska-Błażejowska & Wacław Gierulski, 2018. "Eco-Efficiency Evaluation of Agricultural Production in the EU-28," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Yuldashev, Farhod & Sahin, Bahadir, 2016. "The political economy of mineral resource use: The case of Kyrgyzstan," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 266-272.
    10. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    11. Li, Yongjun & Xie, Jianhui & Wang, Meiqiang & Liang, Liang, 2016. "Super efficiency evaluation using a common platform on a cooperative game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 884-892.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qian Zhang & Huaxing Zhang & Dan Zhao & Baodong Cheng & Chang Yu & Yanli Yang, 2019. "Does Urban Sprawl Inhibit Urban Eco-Efficiency? Empirical Studies of Super-Efficiency and Threshold Regression Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Yuan You & Yongdong Wang & Shengyu Li, 2021. "Effects of eco-policy on Kuwait based upon data envelope analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 12828-12841, September.
    3. Altanshagai Batmunkh & Agus Dwi Nugroho & Maria Fekete-Farkas & Zoltan Lakner, 2022. "Global Challenges and Responses: Agriculture, Economic Globalization, and Environmental Sustainability in Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kanematsu, Simon Y. & Carvalho, Ney P. & Martinhon, Carlos A. & Almeida, Mariana R., 2020. "Ranking using η-efficiency and relative size measures based on DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Shih-Heng Yu & Chia-Wei Hsu, 2020. "A unified extension of super-efficiency in additive data envelopment analysis with integer-valued inputs and outputs: an application to a municipal bus system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 515-535, April.
    3. Vicente J. Bolós & Rafael Benítez & Vicente Coll-Serrano, 2023. "Continuous models combining slacks-based measures of efficiency and super-efficiency," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(2), pages 363-391, June.
    4. Tran, Trung Hieu & Mao, Yong & Nathanail, Paul & Siebers, Peer-Olaf & Robinson, Darren, 2019. "Integrating slacks-based measure of efficiency and super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 156-165.
    5. Thies, Christian & Kieckhäfer, Karsten & Spengler, Thomas S. & Sodhi, Manbir S., 2019. "Operations research for sustainability assessment of products: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 1-21.
    6. Guo-Ya Gan & Hsuan-Shih Lee, 2021. "Resolving the infeasibility of the super-efficiency DEA based on DDF," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 307(1), pages 139-152, December.
    7. Hashem Omrani & Khatereh Shafaat & Arash Alizadeh, 2019. "Integrated data envelopment analysis and cooperative game for evaluating energy efficiency of transportation sector: a case of Iran," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 471-499, March.
    8. Hashem Omrani & Mohaddeseh Amini & Mahdieh Babaei & Khatereh Shafaat, 2020. "Use Shapley value for increasing power distinguish of data envelopment analysis model: An application for estimating environmental efficiency of industrial producers in Iran," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(4), pages 656-675, June.
    9. Mustapha D. Ibrahim & Sahand Daneshvar & Mevhibe B. Hocaoğlu & Olasehinde-Williams G. Oluseye, 2019. "An Estimation of the Efficiency and Productivity of Healthcare Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa: Health-Centred Millennium Development Goal-Based Evidence," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 371-389, May.
    10. Lee, Hsuan-Shih, 2022. "Integrating SBM model and Super-SBM model: a one-model approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    11. An, Qingxian & Tao, Xiangyang & Xiong, Beibei & Chen, Xiaohong, 2022. "Frontier-based incentive mechanisms for allocating common revenues or fixed costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 294-308.
    12. Jianhui Xie & Qiwei Xie & Yongjun Li & Liang Liang, 2021. "Solving data envelopment analysis models with sum-of-fractional objectives: a global optimal approach based on the multiparametric disaggregation technique," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 453-480, September.
    13. Pooja Bansal & Aparna Mehra, 2018. "Multi-period additive efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis with non-positive and undesirable data," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 55(3), pages 642-661, November.
    14. Dai, Qianzhi & Li, Yongjun & Lei, Xiyang & Wu, Dengsheng, 2021. "A DEA-based incentive approach for allocating common revenues or fixed costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 675-686.
    15. Tone, Kaoru & Toloo, Mehdi & Izadikhah, Mohammad, 2020. "A modified slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 560-571.
    16. Qiwei Xie & Linda L. Zhang & Haichao Shang & Ali Emrouznejad & Yongjun Li, 2021. "Evaluating performance of super-efficiency models in ranking efficient decision-making units based on Monte Carlo simulations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 305(1), pages 273-323, October.
    17. Javad Gerami & Mohammad Reza Mozaffari & P. F. Wanke & Henrique Correa, 2022. "A novel slacks-based model for efficiency and super-efficiency in DEA-R," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3373-3410, September.
    18. Ruiqing Yuan & Xiangyang Xu & Yanli Wang & Jiayi Lu & Ying Long, 2024. "Evaluating Carbon-Emission Efficiency in China’s Construction Industry: An SBM-Model Analysis of Interprovincial Building Heating," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    19. Azarnoosh Kafi & Behrouz Daneshian & Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, 2021. "Forecasting the confidence interval of efficiency in fuzzy DEA," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(1), pages 41-59.
    20. Büschken, Joachim, 2009. "When does data envelopment analysis outperform a naïve efficiency measurement model?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(2), pages 647-657, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1922-:d:218695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.