IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i7p1829-d217426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Storing E-waste in Green Infrastructure to Reduce Perceived Value Loss through Landfill Siting and Landscaping: A Case Study in Nanjing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Fu Chen

    (Low Carbon Energy Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
    School of Environmental Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China)

  • Xiaoxiao Li

    (School of Environmental Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China)

  • Yongjun Yang

    (School of Environmental Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China)

  • Huping Hou

    (School of Environmental Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China)

  • Gang-Jun Liu

    (Geospatial Science, College of Science, Engineering and Health, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia)

  • Shaoliang Zhang

    (School of Environmental Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China)

Abstract

Electronic waste (e-waste) represents a severe global environmental issue due to the fast upgrading and updating of electronic products and the high environmental risk. Current low recycling technology, high economic cost, and weak disposal capability make it difficult for e-waste to be rendered 100% harmless. E-waste disposal requires new site-selection methods and site-saving technology to take into account the loss of public perceived value. This study attempts to improve e-waste disposal through siting and landscaping to reduce perceived value loss. The first step is to determine the minimum distance for landfill siting by surveying the minimum loss of perceived value and to use the geographic information system (GIS) to sketch the suitable landfill site thereafter. To optimize the landfill landscape, a landscape infrastructure and its filling process have been designed to reduce the environmental risk and ensure future reuse potential. The application case showed that the minimum distance is 521 m, which was sensitive to the educational level and occupation of residents. The key to landfill landscaping is the construction of isolation layers and the integration of the landfill and urban landscape. The method described in this paper is characterized by minimizing the perceived loss of value to the public, reducing environmental risks, and preserving the resource value of e-waste. This design could provide an alternative to current electronic waste processing methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu Chen & Xiaoxiao Li & Yongjun Yang & Huping Hou & Gang-Jun Liu & Shaoliang Zhang, 2019. "Storing E-waste in Green Infrastructure to Reduce Perceived Value Loss through Landfill Siting and Landscaping: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1829-:d:217426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1829/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1829/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan K. Reichert & Michael Small & Sunil Mohanty, 1992. "The Impact of Landfills on Residential Property Values," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 7(3), pages 297-314.
    2. Hung-Wen Shen & Yue-Hwa Yu, 1997. "Social and Economic Factors in the Spread of the NIMBY Syndrome against Waste Disposal Sites in Taiwan," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 273-282.
    3. Michael Greenberg & Heather Barnes Truelove, 2011. "Energy Choices and Risk Beliefs: Is It Just Global Warming and Fear of a Nuclear Power Plant Accident?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 819-831, May.
    4. Ane Pan & Linxiu Yu & Qing Yang, 2019. "Characteristics and Forecasting of Municipal Solid Waste Generation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-11, March.
    5. Elena Cristina Rada & Marco Ragazzi & Paolo Stefani & Marco Schiavon & Vincenzo Torretta, 2015. "Modelling the Potential Biogas Productivity Range from a MSW Landfill for Its Sustainable Exploitation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Daniela Cordova-Pizarro & Ismael Aguilar-Barajas & David Romero & Ciro A. Rodriguez, 2019. "Circular Economy in the Electronic Products Sector: Material Flow Analysis and Economic Impact of Cellphone E-Waste in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Fu Chen & Xiaoxiao Li & Jing Ma & Yongjun Yang & Gang-Jun Liu, 2018. "An Exploration of the Impacts of Compulsory Source-Separated Policy in Improving Household Solid Waste-Sorting in Pilot Megacities, China: A Case Study of Nanjing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mariano Gallo, 2019. "An Optimisation Model to Consider the NIMBY Syndrome within the Landfill Siting Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Clyde Zhengdao Li & Zhenchao Guo & Dong Su & Bing Xiao & Vivian W. Y. Tam, 2022. "The Application of Advanced Information Technologies in Civil Infrastructure Construction and Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-28, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing Ma & Zhanbin Luo & Fu Chen & Qianlin Zhu & Shaoliang Zhang & Gang-Jun Liu, 2018. "A Practical Approach to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Open Dumps through Infrastructure Restructuring: A Case Study in Nanjing City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Lichi Zhang & Yanyan Jiang & Junmin Wu, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Residents’ Participation in Waste Separation Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, November.
    3. David M. Brasington & Diane Hite, 2005. "Demand for Environmental Quality: A Spatial Hedonic Approach," Departmental Working Papers 2005-08, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
    4. Francesca Nocca & Martina Bosone & Manuel Orabona, 2024. "Multicriteria Evaluation Framework for Industrial Heritage Adaptive Reuse: The Role of the ‘Intrinsic Value’," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Dhiya Durani Sofian Azizi & Marlia M. Hanafiah & Kok Sin Woon, 2023. "Material Flow Analysis in WEEE Management for Circular Economy: A Content Review on Applications, Limitations, and Future Outlook," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Wang, Yu & Gu, Jibao & Wu, Jianlin, 2020. "Explaining local residents’ acceptance of rebuilding nuclear power plants: The roles of perceived general benefit and perceived local benefit," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    7. McCluskey, Jill & Rausser, Gordon C., 2000. "Hazardous waste sites and housing appreciation rates," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt0z9156qx, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    8. Chenyu Lu & Yang Zhang & Hengji Li & Zilong Zhang & Wei Cheng & Shulei Jin & Wei Liu, 2020. "An Integrated Measurement of the Efficiency of China’s Industrial Circular Economy and Associated Influencing Factors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Faisal A. Osra & Huseyin Kurtulus Ozcan & Jaber S. Alzahrani & Mohammad S. Alsoufi, 2021. "Municipal Solid Waste Characterization and Landfill Gas Generation in Kakia Landfill, Makkah," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, January.
    10. Sohani Vihanga Withanage & Komal Habib, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment and Material Flow Analysis: Two Under-Utilized Tools for Informing E-Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Katherine Kiel, 2006. "Environmental Contamination and House Values," Working Papers 0601, College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics.
    12. Mariano Gallo, 2019. "An Optimisation Model to Consider the NIMBY Syndrome within the Landfill Siting Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Alessandro Casasso & Marta Puleo & Deborah Panepinto & Mariachiara Zanetti, 2021. "Economic Viability and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Budget of the Biomethane Retrofit of Manure-Operated Biogas Plants: A Case Study from Piedmont, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    14. John C. Besley & Sang‐Hwa Oh, 2014. "The Impact of Accident Attention, Ideology, and Environmentalism on American Attitudes Toward Nuclear Energy," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(5), pages 949-964, May.
    15. Bogusław Wowrzeczka, 2021. "City of Waste—Importance of Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, April.
    16. Vidas Raudonis & Agne Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene & Linas Eidimtas, 2022. "ANN Hybrid Model for Forecasting Landfill Waste Potential in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Luiz C. Terra dos Santos & Adrielle Frimaio & Biagio F. Giannetti & Feni Agostinho & Gengyuan Liu & Cecilia M. V. B. Almeida, 2023. "Integrating Environmental, Social, and Economic Dimensions to Monitor Sustainability in the G20 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    18. McCluskey, Jill J. & Rausser, Gordon C., 2003. "Hazardous waste sites and housing appreciation rates," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 166-176, March.
    19. Gülbanu Kaptan & Arnout R.H. Fischer & Lynn J. Frewer, 2018. "Extrapolating understanding of food risk perceptions to emerging food safety cases," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 996-1018, August.
    20. Salma Taqi Ghulam & Hatem Abushammala, 2023. "Challenges and Opportunities in the Management of Electronic Waste and Its Impact on Human Health and Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:7:p:1829-:d:217426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.