IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i5p1472-d212574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Application of the Multiple Criteria Decision Aid to Assess Transport Policy Measures Focusing on Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Nosal Hoy

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Krakow, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Solecka

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Krakow, Poland)

  • Andrzej Szarata

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

The sustainable development of transport is fostered by innovations. To implement innovations, the European Commission issues different regulations, programs and initiatives and the European Transport Policy has a significant impact on transport policy in the member states. At the same time, transport policy is dynamic and requires new solutions that will allow the planned goals to be achieved. In this context, it is important to analyze the effectiveness of the current innovation policies, and to create recommendations for future actions that bring innovations to the market. This article concerns the subject of innovation policy in the transport sector. It illustrates the possibility of applying one of the methods of the multiple criteria decision aid, i.e., the simple additive weighting (SAW) method to assess the European Union (EU) and national policy measures in surface transport in terms of their influence on the market take-up of innovations. The use of this method allows for the analyzed policy measures to be contemplated in terms of various criteria and to identify those that best meet the adopted criteria, and thus those that could contribute the most to the stimulation of innovation. The article focuses on the method itself, indicating its flexibility and ease of use, while the analyzed collection of policy measures constitutes only the background of the deliberations.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Nosal Hoy & Katarzyna Solecka & Andrzej Szarata, 2019. "The Application of the Multiple Criteria Decision Aid to Assess Transport Policy Measures Focusing on Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1472-:d:212574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1472/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/5/1472/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaszkiewicz, Andrzej & Slowinski, Roman, 1999. "The `Light Beam Search' approach - an overview of methodology and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 300-314, March.
    2. A. M. Geoffrion & J. S. Dyer & A. Feinberg, 1972. "An Interactive Approach for Multi-Criterion Optimization, with an Application to the Operation of an Academic Department," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4-Part-1), pages 357-368, December.
    3. Andrés, Lidia & Padilla, Emilio, 2018. "Driving factors of GHG emissions in the EU transport activity," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 60-74.
    4. Wiesenthal, Tobias & Condeço-Melhorado, Ana & Leduc, Guillaume, 2015. "Innovation in the European transport sector: A review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 86-93.
    5. Murat Köksalan & Jyrki Wallenius & Stanley Zionts, 2011. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making:From Early History to the 21st Century," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 8042, December.
    6. Hyard, Alexandra, 2013. "Non-technological innovations for sustainable transport," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(7), pages 1375-1386.
    7. Kinga Kijewska & Witold Torbacki & Stanisław Iwan, 2018. "Application of AHP and DEMATEL Methods in Choosing and Analysing the Measures for the Distribution of Goods in Szczecin Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-26, July.
    8. Goldman, Todd & Gorham, Roger, 2006. "Sustainable urban transport: Four innovative directions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 261-273.
    9. Kfir Noy & Moshe Givoni, 2018. "Is ‘Smart Mobility’ Sustainable? Examining the Views and Beliefs of Transport’s Technological Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Roubens, Marc, 1982. "Preference relations on actions and criteria in multicriteria decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 51-55, May.
    11. Lyons, Glenn & Davidson, Cody, 2016. "Guidance for transport planning and policymaking in the face of an uncertain future," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 104-116.
    12. Matarazzo, Benedetto, 1991. "as a compromise between outranking methods and," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 48-65, September.
    13. Oliver Lah, 2017. "Continuity and Change: Dealing with Political Volatility to Advance Climate Change Mitigation Strategies—Examples from the Transport Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-13, June.
    14. Hull, Angela, 2008. "Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 94-103, March.
    15. de Luca, Stefano, 2014. "Public engagement in strategic transportation planning: An analytic hierarchy process based approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 110-124.
    16. Stefan Gössling, 2017. "Police Perspectives on Road Safety and Transport Politics in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Macharis, Cathy & Bernardini, Annalia, 2015. "Reviewing the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: Time for a multi-actor approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 177-186.
    18. Ivanović, Ivan & Grujičić, Dragana & Macura, Dragana & Jović, Jadranka & Bojović, Nebojša, 2013. "One approach for road transport project selection," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 22-29.
    19. Nassereddine, M. & Eskandari, H., 2017. "An integrated MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation systems in Tehran," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 427-439.
    20. Erling Holden & Geoffrey Gilpin, 2013. "Biofuels and Sustainable Transport: A Conceptual Discussion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(7), pages 1-21, July.
    21. Noel, Lance & Zarazua de Rubens, Gerardo & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2018. "Optimizing innovation, carbon and health in transport: Assessing socially optimal electric mobility and vehicle-to-grid pathways in Denmark," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 628-637.
    22. Gelhausen, Marc C. & Berster, Peter & Wilken, Dieter, 2018. "A new direct demand model of long-term forecasting air passengers and air transport movements at German airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 140-152.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anastasios Tsakalidis & Konstantinos Gkoumas & Monica Grosso & Ferenc Pekár, 2020. "TRIMIS: Modular Development of an Integrated Policy-Support Tool for Forward-Oriented Transport Research and Innovation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Isabella M. Lami & Stefano Moroni, 2020. "How Can I Help You? Questioning the Role of Evaluation Techniques in Democratic Decision-Making Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Leibao Zhang & Liming Sheng & Wenyu Zhang & Shuai Zhang, 2020. "Do Personal Norms Predict Citizens’ Acceptance of Green Transport Policies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Liang Lv & Lidong Fan & Bin Meng & Mohammad Zoynul Abedin & Haoyue Feng, 2023. "A Combined Evaluation Method of Corporate Social Responsibility Based on the Difference and Similarity: A Case Study of Transportation Industry in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cassetta, Ernesto & Marra, Alessandro & Pozzi, Cesare & Antonelli, Paola, 2017. "Emerging technological trajectories and new mobility solutions. A large-scale investigation on transport-related innovative start-ups and implications for policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-11.
    2. Imran Yusoff & Boon-Kwee Ng & Suzana Ariff Azizan, 2021. "Towards sustainable transport policy framework: A rail-based transit system in Klang Valley, Malaysia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-30, March.
    3. Chitresh KUMAR & Anirban GANGULY, 2018. "Travelling Together But Differently: Comparing Variations In Public Transit User Mode Choice Attributes Across New Delhi And New York," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(3), pages 54-73, August.
    4. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    5. Daniel Kaszubowski, 2019. "A Method for the Evaluation of Urban Freight Transport Models as a Tool for Improving the Delivery of Sustainable Urban Transport Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Krzysztof Grzelec & Aleksander Jagiełło, 2020. "The Effects of the Selective Enlargement of Fare-Free Public Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    7. João Valsecchi Ribeiro de Souza & Adriana Marotti de Mello & Roberto Marx, 2019. "When Is an Innovative Urban Mobility Business Model Sustainable? A Literature Review and Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Uroš Kramar & Dejan Dragan & Darja Topolšek, 2019. "The Holistic Approach to Urban Mobility Planning with a Modified Focus Group, SWOT, and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-29, November.
    9. Marek Więckowski, 2021. "Will the Consequences of Covid-19 Trigger a Redefining of the Role of Transport in the Development of Sustainable Tourism?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Anastasios Tsakalidis & Mitchell van Balen & Konstantinos Gkoumas & Ferenc Pekar, 2020. "Catalyzing Sustainable Transport Innovation through Policy Support and Monitoring: The Case of TRIMIS and the European Green Deal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Miettinen, Kaisa & Molina, Julián & González, Mercedes & Hernández-Díaz, Alfredo & Caballero, Rafael, 2009. "Using box indices in supporting comparison in multiobjective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 17-24, August.
    12. Pradip Kundu & Ömer Faruk Görçün & Chandra Prakash Garg & Hande Küçükönder & Mustafa Çanakçıoğlu, 2024. "Evaluation of public transportation systems for sustainable cities using an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27655-27684, November.
    13. Varvara Nikulina & David Simon & Henrik Ny & Henrikke Baumann, 2019. "Context-Adapted Urban Planning for Rapid Transitioning of Personal Mobility towards Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-37, February.
    14. Linda E. Karjalainen & Sirkku Juhola, 2019. "Framework for Assessing Public Transportation Sustainability in Planning and Policy-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Xi Lu & Jiaqing Lu & Xinzheng Yang & Xumei Chen, 2022. "Assessment of Urban Mobility via a Pressure-State-Response (PSR) Model with the IVIF-AHP and FCE Methods: A Case Study of Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Awasthi, Anjali & Omrani, Hichem & Gerber, Philippe, 2018. "Investigating ideal-solution based multicriteria decision making techniques for sustainability evaluation of urban mobility projects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 247-259.
    17. Johanna Camargo Pérez & Martha Carrillo & Jairo Montoya-Torres, 2015. "Multi-criteria approaches for urban passenger transport systems: a literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 69-87, March.
    18. Mustafa Hamurcu & Tamer Eren, 2018. "An Application of Multicriteria Decision-making for the Evaluation of Alternative Monorail Routes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Mustafa Hamurcu & Tamer Eren, 2020. "Strategic Planning Based on Sustainability for Urban Transportation: An Application to Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-24, April.
    20. Mustafa, A. & Goh, M., 1996. "Multi-criterion models for higher education administration," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 167-178, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:5:p:1472-:d:212574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.