IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i23p6626-d290247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pathways to Sustainable Intergenerational Programs: Lessons Learned from Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • Cláudia Azevedo

    (Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6PR, UK)

  • Mariano Sánchez

    (Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

Abstract

Despite the fundamental role given to the sustainability of intergenerational programming regarding their demonstrated impact on an aging society, only a few studies have undertaken an exploration of the qualitative core dimensions of sustainable intergenerational programs. This article addresses how the sustainability of educational intergenerational programs relates to why and how intergenerational program managers in the Portuguese area of Porto may have developed different attitudes and beliefs around adequate implementation of the programs. Drawing on qualitative interview data of a four-case fieldwork study conducted in Porto, Portugal, the study examines autonomy, empowerment, and intergenerational relationships as dimensions other than time duration behind program sustainability. Attention to the managers’ narratives on how intergenerational programs are implemented can help to explain why some dimensions are more highlighted than others. A qualitative analysis of intergenerational program sustainability, it is argued, offers considerable findings which provide opportunities to its implementation and intersection with managers’ beliefs. Findings suggest a need to de-emphasize both time duration and managers’ persona as the key for sustainability. We recommend intergenerational program sustainability as an area for future theorizing through providing a conceptualizing framework that might go beyond the normative focus on its duration and into the relational nature of these programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Cláudia Azevedo & Mariano Sánchez, 2019. "Pathways to Sustainable Intergenerational Programs: Lessons Learned from Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6626-:d:290247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6626/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/23/6626/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Harper & Kate Hamblin & Jaco Hoffman & Kenneth Howse & George Leeson, 2014. "International Handbook on Ageing and Public Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14437.
    2. Shannon E. Jarrott, 2010. "Programs that Affect Intergenerational Solidarity," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: María Amparo Cruz-Saco & Sergei Zelenev (ed.), Intergenerational Solidarity, chapter 0, pages 113-127, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Michael Gibbert & Winfried Ruigrok & Barbara Wicki, 2008. "What passes as a rigorous case study?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(13), pages 1465-1474, December.
    4. Dubois, Anna & Gadde, Lars-Erik, 2002. "Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 553-560, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kindström, Daniel & Kowalkowski, Christian & Sandberg, Erik, 2013. "Enabling service innovation: A dynamic capabilities approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1063-1073.
    2. Angela Rocha & Vítor Corado Simões & Renato Cotta Mello & Jorge Carneiro, 2017. "From global start-ups to the borderless firm: Why and how to build a worldwide value system," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 121-144, June.
    3. Yanto Chandra & Chris Styles & Ian Wilkinson, 2015. "Opportunity portfolio: Moving beyond single opportunity explanations in international entrepreneurship research," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 199-228, March.
    4. Mohammad H. Eslami & Nicolette Lakemond, 2016. "Internal Integration In Complex Collaborative Product Development Projects," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(01), pages 1-28, January.
    5. Rengarajan, Srinath & Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan & Moser, Roger & Pereira, Vijay, 2022. "Data strategies for global value chains: Hybridization of small and big data in the aftermath of COVID-19," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 776-787.
    6. Kusi, Samuel Yaw & Gabrielsson, Peter & Kontkanen, Minnie, 2021. "Developing brand identities for international new ventures under uncertainty: Decision-making logics and psychic distance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(6).
    7. Conroy, Kieran M. & Collings, David G., 2016. "The legitimacy of subsidiary issue selling: Balancing positive & negative attention from corporate headquarters," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 612-627.
    8. Kusi, Samuel Yaw & Nwoba, Arinze Christian & Adeola, Ogechi & Adedajo, Adedapo & Adjei, Osei Yaw, 2024. "Does entrepreneurial autonomy always drive emerging market SMEs internationalization? An effectual logic perspective," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    9. Kowalkowski, Christian & Kindström, Daniel & Alejandro, Thomas Brashear & Brege, Staffan & Biggemann, Sergio, 2012. "Service infusion as agile incrementalism in action," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 765-772.
    10. Secchi, Raffaele & Camuffo, Arnaldo, 2019. "Lean implementation failures: The role of organizational ambidexterity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 145-154.
    11. Bertello, Alberto & De Bernardi, Paola & Santoro, Gabriele & Quaglia, Roberto, 2022. "Unveiling the microfoundations of multiplex boundary work for collaborative innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1424-1434.
    12. Lundin, Lisa & Kindström, Daniel, 2023. "Digitalizing customer journeys in B2B markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    13. Sebastian Käss & Christoph Brosig & Markus Westner & Susanne Strahringer, 2024. "Short and sweet: multiple mini case studies as a form of rigorous case study research," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 351-384, June.
    14. Pascal Dey & Chris Steyaert, 2016. "Rethinking the Space of Ethics in Social Entrepreneurship: Power, Subjectivity, and Practices of Freedom," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 627-641, February.
    15. Saarijärvi, Hannu & Mitronen, Lasse & Yrjölä, Mika, 2014. "From selling to supporting – Leveraging mobile services in the context of food retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 26-36.
    16. Lepore, Dominique & Frontoni, Emanuele & Micozzi, Alessandra & Moccia, Sara & Romeo, Luca & Spigarelli, Francesca, 2023. "Uncovering the potential of innovation ecosystems in the healthcare sector after the COVID-19 crisis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 80-86.
    17. Zhang, Hongjuan & Young, Michael N. & Tan, Justin & Sun, Weizheng, 2018. "How Chinese companies deal with a legitimacy imbalance when acquiring firms from developed economies," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 752-767.
    18. Anna Adamik & Michał Nowicki, 2019. "Pathologies and Paradoxes of Co-Creation: A Contribution to the Discussion about Corporate Social Responsibility in Building a Competitive Advantage in the Age of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-38, September.
    19. Caroline Ardelet & Nathalie Veg-Sala & Alain Goudey & Marie Haikel-Elsabeh, 2017. "Between fear and desire for smart products: toward an understanding of consumers ambivalence [Entre crainte et désir pour les objets connectés : comprendre l'ambivalence des consommateurs]," Post-Print hal-01570286, HAL.
    20. Camelia Ilie & Gaston Fornes & Guillermo Cardoza & Juan Carlos Mondragón Quintana, 2020. "Development of Business Schools in Emerging Markets: Learning through Adoption and Adaptation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-28, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6626-:d:290247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.