IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i1p271-d195596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of Multiple Land Use Planning Based on the Coordinated Development of Wetland Farmland: A Case Study of Fuyuan City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Bingmiao Zhu

    (School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China)

  • Xun Zhu

    (School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China)

  • Ran Zhang

    (School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China)

  • Xiaolong Zhao

    (School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China)

Abstract

Fuyuan City is located in the black soil region of northeast China. Its fertile soil and flat terrain provide a reliable guarantee for the scale, intensification, and standardization of farmland. A large amount of land resources that can be used for the national food base has been developed, and the contradiction between the need for wetland protection and arable land development has become increasingly prominent. Based on the remote sensing data of 2000, 2005, and 2010, this paper simulates the future land use/land cover changes structure in Fuyuan City based on the Markov Chain model. According to the characteristics of Fuyuan City’s structure, economy, society, and natural environment, within the overall planning of the city, we explore three scenarios: business-as-usual scenarios, farmland conservation scenarios, and wetland conservation scenarios. The results revealed the following: (1) Under the business-as-usual scenario, the rapid development of Fuyuan City showed the characteristics of the continued expansion of urban area and the reduction of farmland and wetland area in 2020 compared with 2010. (2) Under farmland conservation scenarios, farmland was well protected and stable, while construction land expansion was restricted. (3) Under wetland conservation scenarios, wetland increased dramatically, which mainly derived from farmland, grassland, and unused land. According to the result, optimized countermeasures are proposed to balance the coordinated development of farmland and wetlands, to deepen the multiperiod planning of land use in Fuyuan City and to provide data support and a basis for decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Bingmiao Zhu & Xun Zhu & Ran Zhang & Xiaolong Zhao, 2019. "Study of Multiple Land Use Planning Based on the Coordinated Development of Wetland Farmland: A Case Study of Fuyuan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:271-:d:195596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/271/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/271/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhongqiong Qu & Yiming Lu & Zhiqiu Jiang & Ellen Bassett & Tao Tan, 2018. "A Psychological Approach to ‘Public Perception’ of Land-Use Planning: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Eric de Noronha Vaz & Peter Nijkamp & Marco Painho & Mario Gaetano, 2011. "A Multi-Scenario Forecast of Urban Change: A Study on Urban Growth in the Algarve," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 11-142/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    3. Lorena Peña & Miren Onaindia & Beatriz Fernández de Manuel & Ibone Ametzaga-Arregi & Izaskun Casado-Arzuaga, 2018. "Analysing the Synergies and Trade-Offs between Ecosystem Services to Reorient Land Use Planning in Metropolitan Bilbao (Northern Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stamatia Nasiakou & Michael Vrahnakis & Dimitrios Chouvardas & Georgios Mamanis & Vassiliki Kleftoyanni, 2022. "Land Use Changes for Investments in Silvoarable Agriculture Projected by the CLUE-S Spatio-Temporal Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Chunjiang An & Mengfan Cai & Christophe Guy, 2020. "Rural Sustainable Environmental Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-5, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Leandro Barros & Alexandre Oliveira Tavares & Mário Monteiro & Pedro Pinto Santos, 2018. "Peri-Urbanization and Rurbanization in Leiria City: the Importance of a Planning Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Bosch, Martí & Chenal, Jérôme & Joost, Stéphane, 2019. "Addressing urban sprawl from the complexity sciences," MPRA Paper 93489, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Carlos Rey-Mahía & Luis A. Sañudo-Fontaneda & Valerio C. Andrés-Valeri & Felipe Pedro Álvarez-Rabanal & Stephen John Coupe & Jorge Roces-García, 2019. "Evaluating the Thermal Performance of Wet Swales Housing Ground Source Heat Pump Elements through Laboratory Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Yuanyuan Ma & Yunzi Yang & Hongzan Jiao, 2021. "Exploring the Impact of Urban Built Environment on Public Emotions Based on Social Media Data: A Case Study of Wuhan," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Silvia Ronchi, 2021. "Ecosystem Services for Planning: A Generic Recommendation or a Real Framework? Insights from a Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Grzyb, Tomasz & Kulczyk, Sylwia & Derek, Marta & Woźniak, Edyta, 2021. "Using social media to assess recreation across urban green spaces in times of abrupt change," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    7. Bennett, James & Marandure, Tawanda & Hawkins, Heidi-Jayne & Mapiye, Cletos & Palmer, Anthony & Lemke, Stefanie & Wu, Lianhai & Moradzadeh, Mostafa, 2023. "A conceptual framework for understanding ecosystem trade-offs and synergies, in communal rangeland systems," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    8. Mário Monteiro & Alexandre Oliveira Tavares, 2015. "What is the Influence of the Planning Framework on the Land Use Change Trajectories? Photointerpretation Analysis in the 1958–2011 Period for a Medium/Small Sized City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-29, August.
    9. Opeyemi Adeyemi & Paxie W Chirwa & Folaranmi Dapo Babalola & Pasicha Chaikaew, 2021. "Detecting trade-offs, synergies and bundles among ecosystem services demand using sociodemographic data in Omo Biosphere Reserve, Nigeria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7310-7325, May.
    10. Karima Kourtit & Jan Möhlmann & Peter Nijkamp & Jan Rouwendal, 2013. "The Spatial Distribution of Creative Industries and Cultural Heritage in The Netherlands," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-195/VIII, Tinbergen Institute, revised 29 Jan 2014.
    11. Rong Guo & Yujing Bai, 2019. "Simulation of an Urban-Rural Spatial Structure on the Basis of Green Infrastructure Assessment: The Case of Harbin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Sedigheh Asefi & João Matias & Carlos Gonçalves, 2020. "Transitions between Centralization and Metapolization: From City Development Strategy (CDS) to Peri-Urban Development Strategy (PDS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Zhongqiong Qu & Yongxin Wei & Xun Li, 2021. "Risk Perception of Rural Land Supply Reform in China: From the Perspective of Stakeholders," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-25, July.
    14. Angela Pilogallo & Francesco Scorza, 2022. "Ecosystem Services Multifunctionality: An Analytical Framework to Support Sustainable Spatial Planning in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    15. Spyra, Marcin & La Rosa, Daniele & Zasada, Ingo & Sylla, Marta & Shkaruba, Anton, 2020. "Governance of ecosystem services trade-offs in peri-urban landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    16. Hongmi Koo & Janina Kleemann & Christine Fürst, 2020. "Integrating Ecosystem Services into Land-Use Modeling to Assess the Effects of Future Land-Use Strategies in Northern Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-24, October.
    17. Lorena Peña & Beatriz Fernández de Manuel & Leire Méndez-Fernández & María Viota & Ibone Ametzaga-Arregi & Miren Onaindia, 2020. "Co-Creation of Knowledge for Ecosystem Services Approach to Spatial Planning in the Basque Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Teodoro Semeraro & Zaccarelli Nicola & Alejandro Lara & Francesco Sergi Cucinelli & Roberta Aretano, 2020. "A Bottom-Up and Top-Down Participatory Approach to Planning and Designing Local Urban Development: Evidence from an Urban University Center," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-25, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:271-:d:195596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.