IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i19p5362-d271587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Studies of a Rotary–Centrifugal Grain Grinder Using a Multifactorial Experimental Design Method

Author

Listed:
  • Andrzej Marczuk

    (Department of Agricultural, Forestry and Transport Machines, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głęboka 28, 20-612 Lublin, Poland)

  • Agata Blicharz-Kania

    (Department of Biological Bases of Food and Feed Technologies, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głęboka 28, 20-612 Lublin, Poland)

  • Petr A. Savinykh

    (Federal Agricultural Research Centre of the North-East Named after N.V. Rudnitskiy, Kirov 610007, Russia)

  • Alexey Y. Isupov

    (Federal Agricultural Research Centre of the North-East Named after N.V. Rudnitskiy, Kirov 610007, Russia)

  • Andrey V. Palichyn

    (FSBEI HE Vologda State Dairy Farming Academy (DSFA) named after N.V. Vereshchagin, Vologda—Molochnoye 160555, Russia)

  • Ilya I. Ivanov

    (FSBEI HE Vologda State Dairy Farming Academy (DSFA) named after N.V. Vereshchagin, Vologda—Molochnoye 160555, Russia)

Abstract

A scientific and technical literature review on machines designed to grind fodder grain revealed that the existing designs of grinding machines—those based on destruction by impact, cutting, or chipping—have various drawbacks. Some disadvantages include high metal and energy intensity, an uneven particle size distribution of the ground (crushed) product, a high percentage of dust fraction, the rapid wear of work tools (units), and heating of the product. To eliminate most of the identified shortcomings, the design of a rotary–centrifugal grain grinder is proposed in this paper. The optimization of the grinder’s working process was carried out using experimental design methodology. The following factors were studied: the grain material feed, rotor speed (rpm), opening of the separating surface, number of knives (blades) on the inner and outer rings, technical conditions of the knives (sharpened or unsharpened), and the presence of a special insert that is installed in the radial grooves of the distribution bowl. The optimization criteria were based on the amount of electricity consumed by and the performance of the rotary–centrifugal grain grinder. The quality of performance was quantified by the finished product, based on the percentage of particles larger than 3 mm in size. An analysis of the results of the multifactorial experiment allowed us to establish a relationship (interaction) between the factors and their influence on the optimization criteria, as well as to determine the most significant factors and to define further directions for the research of a centrifugal–rotary grain grinder. From our experimental results, we found that the grinder is underutilized in the selected range of factor variation. Furthermore, the number of knives installed at the second stage of the grinder, the gap (clearance) of the separating surface, and the technical condition of the knives are among the most important factors influencing the power consumption and the quality of the resulting product. A reduction in the number of knives at the first stage has a positive effect on all the selected optimization criteria; and by varying the factors in the selected range, it is possible to obtain a product corresponding to medium and coarse grinding.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrzej Marczuk & Agata Blicharz-Kania & Petr A. Savinykh & Alexey Y. Isupov & Andrey V. Palichyn & Ilya I. Ivanov, 2019. "Studies of a Rotary–Centrifugal Grain Grinder Using a Multifactorial Experimental Design Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5362-:d:271587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5362/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5362/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fiaz Ahmad & Ding Weimin & Ding Qishou & Abdur Rehim & Khawar Jabran, 2017. "Comparative Performance of Various Disc-Type Furrow Openers in No-Till Paddy Field Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Georgiana Moiceanu & Gigel Paraschiv & Gheorghe Voicu & Mirela Dinca & Olivia Negoita & Mihai Chitoiu & Paula Tudor, 2019. "Energy Consumption at Size Reduction of Lignocellulose Biomass for Bioenergy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Ye & Xueting Ma & Jinfei Zhao & Jiean Liao & Xinying Liu & Linqiao Xi & Guangdong Su, 2023. "Optimization and Design of Disc-Type Furrow Opener of No-Till Seeder for Green Manure Crops in South Xinjiang Orchards," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Yue Zhang & Sigrid Kusch-Brandt & Shiyan Gu & Sonia Heaven, 2019. "Particle Size Distribution in Municipal Solid Waste Pre-Treated for Bioprocessing," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Qi Wang & Longtu Zhu & Mingwei Li & Dongyan Huang & Honglei Jia, 2018. "Conservation Agriculture Using Coulters: Effects of Crop Residue on Working Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Guangyuan Zhong & Hongwen Li & Jin He & Qingjie Wang & Caiyun Lu & Chao Wang & Zhenwei Tong & Dandan Cui & Dong He, 2023. "Design and Test of Single-Disc Opener for No-Till Planter Based on Support Cutting," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Sławomir Francik & Adrian Knapczyk & Artur Knapczyk & Renata Francik, 2020. "Decision Support System for the Production of Miscanthus and Willow Briquettes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Adrian Knapczyk & Sławomir Francik & Marcin Jewiarz & Agnieszka Zawiślak & Renata Francik, 2020. "Thermal Treatment of Biomass: A Bibliometric Analysis—The Torrefaction Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-31, December.
    7. Marie-Noël Mansour & Thomas Lendormi & Nicolas Louka & Richard G. Maroun & Zeina Hobaika & Jean-Louis Lanoisellé, 2023. "Anaerobic Digestion of Poultry Droppings in Semi-Continuous Mode and Effect of Their Co-Digestion with Physico-Chemical Sludge on Methane Yield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Areepak, Chitchanok & Jiradechakorn, Thitirat & Chuetor, Santi & Phalakornkule, Chantaraporn & Sriariyanun, Malinee & Raita, Marisa & Champreda, Verawat & Laosiripojana, Navadol, 2022. "Improvement of lignocellulosic pretreatment efficiency by combined chemo - Mechanical pretreatment for energy consumption reduction and biofuel production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 1094-1102.
    9. Marie Berger & Marie-Françoise Devaux & Claire Mayer-Laigle & Adrien Réau & Benoit Delord & Fabienne Guillon & Cécile Barron, 2022. "Friability of Maize Shoot ( Zea mays L.) in Relation to Cell Wall Composition and Physical Properties," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5362-:d:271587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.