IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i19p5216-d270039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study of Comfort Indicators for School Constructions in Sustainability Methodologies: Schools in the Amazon and the Southeast Region of Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana Santos Saraiva

    (International Doctoral Program in Sustainable Built Environment, School of Engineering, Universidade do Minho, 4800058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Edson Martins da Silva

    (Department of Architecture, CEAP—Centro de Ensino Superior do Amapá, Macapá 68906-646, Brazil)

  • Manuela Almeida

    (Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, Universidade do Minho, 4800058 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Luís Bragança

    (Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, Universidade do Minho, 4800058 Guimarães, Portugal)

Abstract

In the 1970s and 1980s, the effects of pollution in the atmosphere grew from a local to a global scale, affecting the entire planet. Consequently, economic and social issues began to be increasingly more connected with environmental protection. Several measures were taken towards environmental preservation, many of those related to the sustainable construction of buildings. This work intended to make a parallel between comfort indicators among different schools in Brazil, beginning with the specific analyses of schools in Juiz de Fora (Minas Gerais, MG), in the Southeast region, and in Macapá (Amapa, AP), in the Amazon or Northern region. This comparison between schools is made to demonstrate the need to adapt methodologies and certifications that promote sustainability in school buildings for each region of Brazil. Questionnaires about ergonomic, thermal, visual and acoustic comfort, and air quality, were applied in two high-school buildings in Juiz de Fora, Academia School and Santa Catarina School, and in two high schools in Macapá, Tiradentes School and Professor Gabriel Almeida Café school, to understand the difference between these two regions of Brazil regarding comfort conditions. A comparison between the results of the four schools was made, proving the necessity of the elaboration of a specific methodology for each Brazilian region.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana Santos Saraiva & Edson Martins da Silva & Manuela Almeida & Luís Bragança, 2019. "Comparative Study of Comfort Indicators for School Constructions in Sustainability Methodologies: Schools in the Amazon and the Southeast Region of Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5216-:d:270039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5216/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5216/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tatiana Santos Saraiva & Manuela De Almeida & Luís Bragança & Maria Teresa Barbosa, 2018. "Environmental Comfort Indicators for School Buildings in Sustainability Assessment Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-11, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yi-Wen Liao & Zhi-Yuan Su & Chiung-Wei Huang & Rustam Shadiev, 2019. "The Influence of Environmental, Social, and Personal Factors on the Usage of the App “Environment Info Push”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Geraldi, Matheus Soares & Ghisi, Enedir, 2022. "Data-driven framework towards realistic bottom-up energy benchmarking using an Artificial Neural Network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    3. Erika Dolnikova & Dusan Katunsky & Marian Vertal & Marek Zozulak, 2020. "Influence of Roof Windows Area Changes on the Classroom Indoor Climate in the Attic Space: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Geraldi, Matheus Soares & Ghisi, Enedir, 2022. "Integrating evidence-based thermal satisfaction in energy benchmarking: A data-driven approach for a whole-building evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ksenija Tijanić Štrok & Diana Car-Pušić & Saša Marenjak, 2023. "Priorities in Croatian School Building Maintenance: A Comparison of the Main Stakeholders’ Views," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Ana Angelita Costa Neves da Rocha & Juan Lucas Nachez, 2023. "School Space and Sustainability in the Tropics: The Case of Thermal Comfort in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Mekhala Kaluarachchi & Anuradha Waidyasekara & Raufdeen Rameezdeen & Nicholas Chileshe, 2021. "Mitigating Dust Pollution from Construction Activities: A Behavioural Control Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Carla Balocco & Alessandro Colaianni, 2018. "Modelling of Reversible Plant System Operations in a Cultural Heritage School Building for Indoor Thermal Comfort," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Vicente López-Chao & Antonio Amado Lorenzo & Jorge Martin-Gutiérrez, 2019. "Architectural Indoor Analysis: A Holistic Approach to Understand the Relation of Higher Education Classrooms and Academic Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Tatiana Santos Saraiva & Manuela Almeida & Luís Bragança & Maria Teresa Barbosa, 2019. "The Inclusion of a Sustainability Awareness Indicator in Assessment Tools for High School Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-11, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5216-:d:270039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.