IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i6p1849-d150323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Comfort Indicators for School Buildings in Sustainability Assessment Tools

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana Santos Saraiva

    (International Doctoral Program in Sustainable Built Environment, School of Engineering, Minho University, Guimarães 4800058, Portugal)

  • Manuela De Almeida

    (Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, Minho University, Guimarães 4800058, Portugal)

  • Luís Bragança

    (Department of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, Minho University, Guimarães 4800058, Portugal)

  • Maria Teresa Barbosa

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora 36036900, Brazil)

Abstract

Decades ago, the only requirement to construct a building was to give men the right conditions for the execution of their work or leisure activities. With the development of knowledge about the internal and external environments of buildings, other requirements have been added such as the issue of user comfort. New construction techniques have been incorporated and new products have been created to improve internal environment comfort. This research addressed the importance of using indicators related to environmental comfort in sustainability assessment tools applied to school buildings. It also considered the importance of environmental issues for the good performance of human beings, and the harmonious coexistence of the comfort indicators indoor air quality, thermal comfort, visual comfort, acoustic comfort and ergonomic comfort based on data gathered in research carried out with users of high schools (only students). This research was carried out in two different cities of different countries, Guimarães (Portugal) and Juiz de Fora (Brazil), that have similar characteristics of teaching standards and climate conditions (temperature and air humidity). In this study, interviews were made through questionnaires and, later, the information collected was analyzed. This study demonstrates the need to include an ergonomic indicator for school buildings in sustainability assessment tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana Santos Saraiva & Manuela De Almeida & Luís Bragança & Maria Teresa Barbosa, 2018. "Environmental Comfort Indicators for School Buildings in Sustainability Assessment Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:1849-:d:150323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1849/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1849/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana Angelita Costa Neves da Rocha & Juan Lucas Nachez, 2023. "School Space and Sustainability in the Tropics: The Case of Thermal Comfort in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Tatiana Santos Saraiva & Edson Martins da Silva & Manuela Almeida & Luís Bragança, 2019. "Comparative Study of Comfort Indicators for School Constructions in Sustainability Methodologies: Schools in the Amazon and the Southeast Region of Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Tatiana Santos Saraiva & Manuela Almeida & Luís Bragança & Maria Teresa Barbosa, 2019. "The Inclusion of a Sustainability Awareness Indicator in Assessment Tools for High School Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-11, January.
    4. Ksenija Tijanić Štrok & Diana Car-Pušić & Saša Marenjak, 2023. "Priorities in Croatian School Building Maintenance: A Comparison of the Main Stakeholders’ Views," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Carla Balocco & Alessandro Colaianni, 2018. "Modelling of Reversible Plant System Operations in a Cultural Heritage School Building for Indoor Thermal Comfort," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Mekhala Kaluarachchi & Anuradha Waidyasekara & Raufdeen Rameezdeen & Nicholas Chileshe, 2021. "Mitigating Dust Pollution from Construction Activities: A Behavioural Control Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Vicente López-Chao & Antonio Amado Lorenzo & Jorge Martin-Gutiérrez, 2019. "Architectural Indoor Analysis: A Holistic Approach to Understand the Relation of Higher Education Classrooms and Academic Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:1849-:d:150323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.