IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i17p4737-d262411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Surrogate Video-Based Safety Methodology for Diagnosis and Evaluation of Low-Cost Pedestrian-Safety Countermeasures: The Case of Cochabamba, Bolivia

Author

Listed:
  • Lynn Scholl

    (Inter-American Development Bank, 1300 New York Ave, Washington, DC 20577, USA)

  • Mohamed Elagaty

    (Department of Civil Engineering McGill University, 817 Sherbrooke St. W., Office 391, Montreal, QC H3A 2K6, Canada)

  • Bismarck Ledezma-Navarro

    (Department of Civil Engineering McGill University, 817 Sherbrooke St. W., Office 391, Montreal, QC H3A 2K6, Canada)

  • Edgar Zamora

    (Inter-American Development Bank, Peter Bruneslaan 2-4, Paramaribo, Suriname)

  • Luis Miranda-Moreno

    (Department of Civil Engineering McGill University, 817 Sherbrooke St. W., Office 391, Montreal, QC H3A 2K6, Canada)

Abstract

Due to a lack of reliable data collection systems, traffic fatalities and injuries are often under-reported in developing countries. Recent developments in surrogate road safety methods and video analytics tools offer an alternative approach that can be both lower cost and more time efficient when crash data is incomplete or missing. However, very few studies investigating pedestrian road safety in developing countries using these approaches exist. This research uses an automated video analytics tool to develop and analyze surrogate traffic safety measures and to evaluate the effectiveness of temporary low-cost countermeasures at selected pedestrian crossings at risky intersections in the city of Cochabamba, Bolivia. Specialized computer vision software is used to process hundreds of hours of video data and generate data on road users’ speed and trajectories. We find that motorcycles, turning movements, and roundabouts, are among the key factors related to pedestrian crash risk, and that the implemented treatments were effective at four-legged intersections but not at traditional-design roundabouts. This study demonstrates the applicability of the surrogate methodology based on automated video analytics in the Latin American context, where traditional methods are challenging to implement. The methodology could serve as a tool to rapidly evaluate temporary treatments before they are permanently implemented and replicated.

Suggested Citation

  • Lynn Scholl & Mohamed Elagaty & Bismarck Ledezma-Navarro & Edgar Zamora & Luis Miranda-Moreno, 2019. "A Surrogate Video-Based Safety Methodology for Diagnosis and Evaluation of Low-Cost Pedestrian-Safety Countermeasures: The Case of Cochabamba, Bolivia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4737-:d:262411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4737/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4737/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carl Johnsson & Aliaksei Laureshyn & Tim De Ceunynck, 2018. "In search of surrogate safety indicators for vulnerable road users: a review of surrogate safety indicators," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 765-785, November.
    2. Itf, 2017. "Benchmarking Road Safety in Latin America," International Transport Forum Policy Papers 43, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nopadon Kronprasert & Chomphunut Sutheerakul & Thaned Satiennam & Paramet Luathep, 2021. "Intersection Safety Assessment Using Video-Based Traffic Conflict Analysis: The Case Study of Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klymak, Margaryta, 2023. "The trade effects of information provision about forced and child labor," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2018. "Trump and Globalization," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 515-528.
    3. Roja Ezzati Amini & Christos Katrakazas & Constantinos Antoniou, 2019. "Negotiation and Decision-Making for a Pedestrian Roadway Crossing: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Sorin Liviu Jurj & Tino Werner & Dominik Grundt & Willem Hagemann & Eike Möhlmann, 2022. "Towards Safe and Sustainable Autonomous Vehicles Using Environmentally-Friendly Criticality Metrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-52, June.
    5. Raju, Narayana & Arkatkar, Shriniwas & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2022. "Investigating traffic safety reckoning hyperbolic driving following behavior using trajectory data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 606(C).
    6. Osuna Ramírez, Sergio Andrés & Veloutsou, Cleopatra & Morgan-Thomas, Anna, 2024. "On the antipodes of love and hate: The conception and measurement of brand polarization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Alex Pauwels & Nadia Pourmohammad-Zia & Frederik Schulte, 2022. "Safety and Sustainable Development of Automated Driving in Mixed-Traffic Urban Areas—Considering Vulnerable Road Users and Network Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    traffic safety; pedestrians; surrogate measures; machine learning; developing countries;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise
    • L91 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Transportation: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4737-:d:262411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.