IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i17p4693-d261832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Alternative Evaluation and Indicating Methodology for Sustainable Fire Safety in the Process Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Dorota Brzezińska

    (Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Poland)

  • Paul Bryant

    (Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Poland)

  • Adam S. Markowski

    (Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Poland)

Abstract

There is a mismatch between the desire to introduce greater levels of sustainability in engineering design and in the need to provide effective engineering solutions, particularly where issues of human safety and asset protection are involved. Sustainability engineering typically incorporates economic, environmental, and social factors, all of which are highly relevant and applicable to fire safety and the design of fire protection systems. The term fire strategy denotes a documented methodology to encapsulate a full range of such systems, within a single framework, for more complex risks such as those found in the process industry. The subject of fire safety is emotive and its application within building design may not change unless we refocus on a holistic and strategic approach, especially for complex building profiles. Fire is a recognized critical safety issue for most types of industrial plants. Due to the complexity of the processes, even a relatively small fire accident can lead to a chain of events that could be devastating, resulting in huge asset and continuity losses, damage to the local environment, and of course, the threat to life. More complex processes require a more flexible and relevant approach. The use of fire safety engineering and performance-based evaluation techniques, instead of prescriptive rules, continues to grow in prominence because of this. This is the case when specifying fire protection and safety for modern power generating plants. However, when it comes to critical infrastructure, such as is the case with power plants, it is sometimes not clear whether optimum fire safety engineering solutions have been applied. One of the ideas specifically developed for evaluating the most appropriate fire safety strategies and systems, especially for such infrastructure examples, is a method based upon the British Standard Specification PAS 911. This method is captured in a diagram and identifies eight main elements for fire safety and protection. The idea presented in this article is to allow assessment of a submitted actual fire strategy for a building or other form of infrastructure, against what has been predetermined as a standard baseline fire strategy for, in this case, a power plant building. The assessment makes use of a multi-level questionnaire, in this case specifically formulated for power plant fire safety needs. By comparing the actual fire strategy diagram against a baseline fire strategy, enforcement agencies, or other interested stakeholders, can recognize which fire safety factors play the most important part in the fire strategy, and determine whether proper levels of fire safety and protection have been applied. The fire strategy evaluation is realized by a team of engineers, which consists of independent fire strategist from a consultant office, internal fire and technical experts from the industrial plant, such as the person responsible for fire safety, person responsible for explosion safety, person responsible for housekeeping, and building manager. Additionally, there should be representatives of insurance companies and independent fire experts. Typically, the group consists of 7 to 12 people.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorota Brzezińska & Paul Bryant & Adam S. Markowski, 2019. "An Alternative Evaluation and Indicating Methodology for Sustainable Fire Safety in the Process Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4693-:d:261832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4693/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4693/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vasily Novozhilov, 2017. "Fire Hazards of Some Modern Solid Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Hong Sheng Huang & Chung Hwei Su & Cheng Bang Li & Ching Yuan Lin & Chun Chou Lin, 2016. "Enhancement of Fire Safety of an Existing Green Building due to Natural Ventilation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-28, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fco. Javier García-Gómez & Cristina González-Gaya & Víctor Fco. Rosales-Prieto, 2020. "An Approach to Health and Safety Assessment in Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Renata Turisova & Juraj Sinay & Hana Pacaiova & Zuzana Kotianova & Juraj Glatz, 2020. "Application of the EFQM Model to Assess the Readiness and Sustainability of the Implementation of I4.0 in Slovakian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Dorota Brzezińska & Paul Bryant, 2020. "Risk Index Method–A Tool for Sustainable, Holistic Building Fire Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Małgorzata Wojtkowska & Agnieszka Malesińska & Agnieszka Machowska & Pierfabrizio Puntorieri & Giuseppe Barbaro & Vincenzo Fiamma & Stanisław Biedugnis, 2022. "The Influence of Water Quality Change on the Corrosion Process in Galvanized Pipes of Fire Protection Installations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksander Król & Małgorzata Król, 2018. "Transient Analyses and Energy Balance of Air Flow in Road Tunnels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Teng-Yi Wang & Kuang-Chung Tsai, 2021. "Effects of Time to Unactuate Air Conditioning on Fire Growth," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Ullah, Kafait & Hamid, Salman & Mirza, Faisal Mehmood & Shakoor, Usman, 2018. "Prioritizing the gaseous alternatives for the road transport sector of Pakistan: A multi criteria decision making analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1072-1084.
    4. Anna Laura Pisello & Claudia Fabiani & Nastaran Makaremi & Veronica Lucia Castaldo & Gianluca Cavalaglio & Andrea Nicolini & Marco Barbanera & Franco Cotana, 2016. "Sustainable New Brick and Thermo-Acoustic Insulation Panel from Mineralization of Stranded Driftwood Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4693-:d:261832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.