IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i17p4667-d261515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eco-Industrial Park (EIP) Development in Viet Nam: Results and Key Insights from UNIDO’s EIP Project (2014–2019)

Author

Listed:
  • Jérôme Stucki

    (United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Department of Environment (UNIDO), Industrial Resource Efficiency Division, Vienna International Centre, 1400 Vienna, Austria)

  • Alessandro Flammini

    (United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Department of Environment (UNIDO), Industrial Resource Efficiency Division, Vienna International Centre, 1400 Vienna, Austria)

  • Dick van Beers

    (United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Department of Environment (UNIDO), Industrial Resource Efficiency Division, Vienna International Centre, 1400 Vienna, Austria)

  • Tran Thanh Phuong

    (United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Department of Environment (UNIDO), Industrial Resource Efficiency Division, Vienna International Centre, 1400 Vienna, Austria)

  • Nguyen Tram Anh

    (United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Department of Environment (UNIDO), Industrial Resource Efficiency Division, Vienna International Centre, 1400 Vienna, Austria)

  • Tran Duy Dong

    (Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI), Department of Economic Zones Management, Hanoi 100803, Viet Nam)

  • Vu Quoc Huy

    (Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI), Department of Economic Zones Management, Hanoi 100803, Viet Nam)

  • Vuong Thi Minh Hieu

    (Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI), Department of Economic Zones Management, Hanoi 100803, Viet Nam)

Abstract

Industrial parks have been promoted as cornerstone strategies for economic development in countries around the world, including Viet Nam. The transformation of conventional industrial zones (IZs) into eco-industrial parks (EIPs) presents an effective opportunity to attain inclusive and sustainable industrial development, as well as increasing the economic competitiveness and resilience of industrial parks. This paper presents and discusses the interventions, key results, and lessons learned from the Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI) and UNIDO’s work on EIPs in Viet Nam as part of the Project “Implementation of eco-industrial park initiative for sustainable industrial zones in Viet Nam”. The Project was undertaken with the objective of developing policies and guidelines to facilitate the transformation of industrial zones into eco-industrial parks and implementing EIP principles in five existing industrial zones in the provinces of Da Nang (Hoa Khanh IZ), Can Tho (Tra Noc 1 and 2 IZs), and Ninh Binh (Khanh Phu IZ and Gian Khau IZ), which serve as pilots to support replication and upscaling across Viet Nam. The application of the Project’s policy, company, and park-level interventions demonstrated their value in contributing to the development and implementation of EIP practices in the country. Rather than stand-alone solutions, multi-disciplinary EIP concepts are most effective if applied as part of an integrated top-down approach (policy support as entry point for interventions) combined with a bottom-up approach (industrial park as entry point). The issuance of Decree 82/2018/ND-CP on the management of industrial parks and economic zones is a new policy outlining the requirements and process for transforming industrial zones into EIPs. The Decree is thereby an important driver for EIP development. Legal challenges with regards to EIPs still exist, including the lack of available and reliable data and the need for detailed standards and guidelines on reusing by-products, wastes, and wastewater. The final adoption of minimum EIP requirements in Viet Nam for social, economic, and environmental aspects is a key issue for scaling up implementation. The work undertaken as part of the Project will continue through the Global EIP Programme, in which Viet Nam is one of the participating countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Jérôme Stucki & Alessandro Flammini & Dick van Beers & Tran Thanh Phuong & Nguyen Tram Anh & Tran Duy Dong & Vu Quoc Huy & Vuong Thi Minh Hieu, 2019. "Eco-Industrial Park (EIP) Development in Viet Nam: Results and Key Insights from UNIDO’s EIP Project (2014–2019)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-23, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4667-:d:261515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4667/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4667/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dick van Beers & Albena Bossilkov & Glen Corder & Rene van Berkel, 2007. "Industrial Symbiosis in the Australian Minerals Industry: The Cases of Kwinana and Gladstone," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(1), pages 55-72, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Efrain Boom-Cárcamo & Rita Peñabaena-Niebles, 2022. "Analysis of the Development of Industrial Symbiosis in Emerging and Frontier Market Countries: Barriers and Drivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-32, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diogo Ferraz & Fernanda P. S. Falguera & Enzo B. Mariano & Dominik Hartmann, 2021. "Linking Economic Complexity, Diversification, and Industrial Policy with Sustainable Development: A Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Anna Rohde-Lütje & Volker Wohlgemuth, 2020. "Recurring Patterns and Blueprints of Industrial Symbioses as Structural Units for an IT Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Glen D. Corder & Artem Golev & Julian Fyfe & Sarah King, 2014. "The Status of Industrial Ecology in Australia: Barriers and Enablers," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Emilia Faria & Cristiane Barreto & Armando Caldeira-Pires & Jorge Alfredo Cerqueira Streit & Patricia Guarnieri, 2023. "Brazilian Circular Economy Pilot Project: Integrating Local Stakeholders’ Perception and Social Context in Industrial Symbiosis Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-28, February.
    5. John Rincón-Moreno & Marta Ormazabal & Maria J. Álvarez & Carmen Jaca, 2020. "Shortcomings of Transforming a Local Circular Economy System through Industrial Symbiosis: A Case Study in Spanish SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    6. van Beers, D. & Bossilkov, A. & Lund, C., 2009. "Development of large scale reuses of inorganic by-products in Australia: The case study of Kwinana, Western Australia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 365-378.
    7. Angela Neves & Radu Godina & Susana G. Azevedo & Carina Pimentel & João C.O. Matias, 2019. "The Potential of Industrial Symbiosis: Case Analysis and Main Drivers and Barriers to Its Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-68, December.
    8. Emilia Faria & Armando Caldeira-Pires & Cristiane Barreto, 2021. "Social, Economic, and Institutional Configurations of the Industrial Symbiosis Process: A Comparative Analysis of the Literature and a Proposed Theoretical and Analytical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Aid, Graham & Eklund, Mats & Anderberg, Stefan & Baas, Leenard, 2017. "Expanding roles for the Swedish waste management sector in inter-organizational resource management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 85-97.
    10. Lovisa Harfeldt-Berg & Sarah Broberg & Karin Ericsson, 2022. "The Importance of Individual Actor Characteristics and Contextual Aspects for Promoting Industrial Symbiosis Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    11. Joel Ntsonde & Franck Aggeri, 2019. "Conducting the Circular Economy transition -the role of circular public procurement," Post-Print hal-02099357, HAL.
    12. Park, Joo Young, 2014. "Assessing determinants of industrial waste reuse: The case of coal ash in the United States," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 116-127.
    13. Harshini Mallawaarachchi & Gayani Karunasena & Yasangika Sandanayake & Chunlu Liu, 2023. "Conceptualising a Model to Assess the Optimum Water Flow of Industrial Symbiosis (IS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Galloway, David & Newman, Peter, 2014. "How to design a sustainable heavy industrial estate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 46-52.
    15. Tran Thi Mai Thanh & Do Dieu Huong & Nguyen Duc Long & Nguyen Duy Dat & Mai Thanh Huyen & Hoang Cao Cuong, 2023. "Assessing the Feasibility of Eco-Industrial Parks in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Thang Long II Industrial Park in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Anthony Halog & Raquel Balanay & Sandra Anieke & Tsz Yan Yu, 2021. "Circular Economy across Australia: Taking Stock of Progress and Lessons," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 283-301, June.
    17. Hua Cui & Changhao Liu & Raymond Côté & Weifeng Liu, 2018. "Understanding the Evolution of Industrial Symbiosis with a System Dynamics Model: A Case Study of Hai Hua Industrial Symbiosis, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    18. Joel Ntsonde & Franck Aggeri, 2019. "Conducting the Circular Economy transition -the role of circular public procurement," Working Papers hal-02099357, HAL.
    19. Hashimoto, Shizuka & Fujita, Tsuyoshi & Geng, Yong & Nagasawa, Emiri, 2010. "Realizing CO2 emission reduction through industrial symbiosis: A cement production case study for Kawasaki," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(10), pages 704-710.
    20. Alessandra Sorrentini Sorrentini & Massimo Valeri & Francesca Sorrentini & Antonella Russo, 2023. "Predicting the Evolution of Literature on Industrial Symbiosis Using Topic Modeling," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(5), pages 1-1, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:17:p:4667-:d:261515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.