IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v53y2009i7p365-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of large scale reuses of inorganic by-products in Australia: The case study of Kwinana, Western Australia

Author

Listed:
  • van Beers, D.
  • Bossilkov, A.
  • Lund, C.

Abstract

The development of regional resource synergies in heavy industrial areas provides a significant avenue towards sustainable resource processing. Despite the fact that the number of examples of regional resource synergies around the world is growing, the reuse of inorganic by-products (e.g. bauxite residue, fly ash, kiln dusts, gypsum, slag) in Australia have not yet materialised on a significant scale. This is due to the fragmented approach adopted in the past and a range of barriers associated with their reuse. The drivers and barriers for inorganic by-product reuses appear to fall in nine broad categories: regulation, economics, community, technology, transportation, confidential and commercial issues, risk and liabilities, industry focus and priorities, and region specific issues. This paper shows that significant potential exist for the establishment of large volume reuse of these inorganic by-products in Australia, using the Kwinana Industrial Area as a case study. The inorganic by-products available in Kwinana could be used to supply the growing demand for already scarce building and construction materials in Western Australia. Although regulatory reuse standards exist elsewhere (e.g. European Union, USA), one of the main obstacles for the Kwinana industries is the absence of standard application protocols to allow for the routine use of their inorganic by-products. A coordinated stakeholder approach is being facilitated and applied in Kwinana that targets the realisation of large volume reuse opportunities that have both a good business and sustainability case and also government and community support. Based on the Kwinana experiences, this paper provides perspectives and learnings for elsewhere in Australia and in countries where current regulatory frameworks do not encourage or restrict the uptake of inorganic by-product reuses on a large scale.

Suggested Citation

  • van Beers, D. & Bossilkov, A. & Lund, C., 2009. "Development of large scale reuses of inorganic by-products in Australia: The case study of Kwinana, Western Australia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 365-378.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:53:y:2009:i:7:p:365-378
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.02.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344909000470
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.02.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dick van Beers & Albena Bossilkov & Glen Corder & Rene van Berkel, 2007. "Industrial Symbiosis in the Australian Minerals Industry: The Cases of Kwinana and Gladstone," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(1), pages 55-72, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diogo Ferraz & Fernanda P. S. Falguera & Enzo B. Mariano & Dominik Hartmann, 2021. "Linking Economic Complexity, Diversification, and Industrial Policy with Sustainable Development: A Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Anna Rohde-Lütje & Volker Wohlgemuth, 2020. "Recurring Patterns and Blueprints of Industrial Symbioses as Structural Units for an IT Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Glen D. Corder & Artem Golev & Julian Fyfe & Sarah King, 2014. "The Status of Industrial Ecology in Australia: Barriers and Enablers," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Emilia Faria & Cristiane Barreto & Armando Caldeira-Pires & Jorge Alfredo Cerqueira Streit & Patricia Guarnieri, 2023. "Brazilian Circular Economy Pilot Project: Integrating Local Stakeholders’ Perception and Social Context in Industrial Symbiosis Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-28, February.
    5. John Rincón-Moreno & Marta Ormazabal & Maria J. Álvarez & Carmen Jaca, 2020. "Shortcomings of Transforming a Local Circular Economy System through Industrial Symbiosis: A Case Study in Spanish SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Jérôme Stucki & Alessandro Flammini & Dick van Beers & Tran Thanh Phuong & Nguyen Tram Anh & Tran Duy Dong & Vu Quoc Huy & Vuong Thi Minh Hieu, 2019. "Eco-Industrial Park (EIP) Development in Viet Nam: Results and Key Insights from UNIDO’s EIP Project (2014–2019)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Angela Neves & Radu Godina & Susana G. Azevedo & Carina Pimentel & João C.O. Matias, 2019. "The Potential of Industrial Symbiosis: Case Analysis and Main Drivers and Barriers to Its Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-68, December.
    8. Emilia Faria & Armando Caldeira-Pires & Cristiane Barreto, 2021. "Social, Economic, and Institutional Configurations of the Industrial Symbiosis Process: A Comparative Analysis of the Literature and a Proposed Theoretical and Analytical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Aid, Graham & Eklund, Mats & Anderberg, Stefan & Baas, Leenard, 2017. "Expanding roles for the Swedish waste management sector in inter-organizational resource management," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 85-97.
    10. Lovisa Harfeldt-Berg & Sarah Broberg & Karin Ericsson, 2022. "The Importance of Individual Actor Characteristics and Contextual Aspects for Promoting Industrial Symbiosis Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    11. Joel Ntsonde & Franck Aggeri, 2019. "Conducting the Circular Economy transition -the role of circular public procurement," Post-Print hal-02099357, HAL.
    12. Park, Joo Young, 2014. "Assessing determinants of industrial waste reuse: The case of coal ash in the United States," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 116-127.
    13. Harshini Mallawaarachchi & Gayani Karunasena & Yasangika Sandanayake & Chunlu Liu, 2023. "Conceptualising a Model to Assess the Optimum Water Flow of Industrial Symbiosis (IS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Galloway, David & Newman, Peter, 2014. "How to design a sustainable heavy industrial estate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 46-52.
    15. Tran Thi Mai Thanh & Do Dieu Huong & Nguyen Duc Long & Nguyen Duy Dat & Mai Thanh Huyen & Hoang Cao Cuong, 2023. "Assessing the Feasibility of Eco-Industrial Parks in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Thang Long II Industrial Park in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Anthony Halog & Raquel Balanay & Sandra Anieke & Tsz Yan Yu, 2021. "Circular Economy across Australia: Taking Stock of Progress and Lessons," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 283-301, June.
    17. Hua Cui & Changhao Liu & Raymond Côté & Weifeng Liu, 2018. "Understanding the Evolution of Industrial Symbiosis with a System Dynamics Model: A Case Study of Hai Hua Industrial Symbiosis, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    18. Joel Ntsonde & Franck Aggeri, 2019. "Conducting the Circular Economy transition -the role of circular public procurement," Working Papers hal-02099357, HAL.
    19. Hashimoto, Shizuka & Fujita, Tsuyoshi & Geng, Yong & Nagasawa, Emiri, 2010. "Realizing CO2 emission reduction through industrial symbiosis: A cement production case study for Kawasaki," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(10), pages 704-710.
    20. Alessandra Sorrentini Sorrentini & Massimo Valeri & Francesca Sorrentini & Antonella Russo, 2023. "Predicting the Evolution of Literature on Industrial Symbiosis Using Topic Modeling," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(5), pages 1-1, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:53:y:2009:i:7:p:365-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.