IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i16p4424-d258114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Flexible Operation of Coal Power and Its Renewable Integration Potential in China

Author

Listed:
  • Chunning Na

    (School of Physics and Electrical Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Huan Pan

    (School of Physics and Electrical Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Yuhong Zhu

    (School of Physics and Electrical Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Jiahai Yuan

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Lixia Ding

    (Eco-tech Research Institute, State Grid Ningxia Electric Power Co., Ltd., Yinchuan 750004, China)

  • Jungang Yu

    (Ningxia Jingneng Ningdong Electric Power Co., Ltd., Yinchuan 750409, China)

Abstract

At present time, China’s power systems face significant challenges in integrating large-scale renewable energy and reducing the curtailed renewable energy. In order to avoid the curtailment of renewable energy, the power systems need significant flexibility requirements in China. In regions where coal is still heavily relied upon for generating electricity, the flexible operations of coal power units will be the most feasible option to face these challenges. The study first focused on the reasons why the flexible operation of existing coal power units would potentially promote the integration of renewable energy in China and then reviewed the impacts on the performance levels of the units. A simple flexibility operation model was constructed to estimate the integration potential with the existing coal power units under several different scenarios. This study’s simulation results revealed that the existing retrofitted coal power units could provide flexibility in the promotion of the integration of renewable energy in a certain extent. However, the integration potential increment of 20% of the rated power for the coal power units was found to be lower than that of 30% of the rated power. Therefore, by considering the performance impacts of the coal power units with low performances in load operations, it was considered to not be economical for those units to operate at lower than 30% of the rated power. It was believed that once the capacity share of the renewable energy had achieved a continuously growing trend, the existing coal power units would fail to meet the flexibility requirements. Therefore, it was recommended in this study that other flexible resources should be deployed in the power systems for the purpose of reducing the curtailment of renewable energy. Furthermore, based on this study’s obtained evidence, in order to realize a power system with high proportions of renewable energy, China should strive to establish a power system with adequate flexible resources in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunning Na & Huan Pan & Yuhong Zhu & Jiahai Yuan & Lixia Ding & Jungang Yu, 2019. "The Flexible Operation of Coal Power and Its Renewable Integration Potential in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4424-:d:258114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4424/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4424/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ding, Huajie & Hu, Zechun & Song, Yonghua, 2012. "Stochastic optimization of the daily operation of wind farm and pumped-hydro-storage plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 571-578.
    2. Gu, Yujiong & Xu, Jing & Chen, Dongchao & Wang, Zhong & Li, Qianqian, 2016. "Overall review of peak shaving for coal-fired power units in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 723-731.
    3. Garðarsdóttir, Stefanía Ó. & Göransson, Lisa & Normann, Fredrik & Johnsson, Filip, 2018. "Improving the flexibility of coal-fired power generators: Impact on the composition of a cost-optimal electricity system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 277-289.
    4. Xu, Gang & Yang, Yong-ping & Lu, Shi-yuan & Li, Le & Song, Xiaona, 2011. "Comprehensive evaluation of coal-fired power plants based on grey relational analysis and analytic hierarchy process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2343-2351, May.
    5. Chunning Na & Jiahai Yuan & Yuhong Zhu & Li Xue, 2018. "Economic Decision-Making for Coal Power Flexibility Retrofitting and Compensation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Brouwer, Anne Sjoerd & van den Broek, Machteld & Seebregts, Ad & Faaij, André, 2015. "Operational flexibility and economics of power plants in future low-carbon power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 107-128.
    7. Kubik, M.L. & Coker, P.J. & Barlow, J.F., 2015. "Increasing thermal plant flexibility in a high renewables power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 102-111.
    8. Alexander Kies & Bruno U. Schyska & Lueder Von Bremen, 2016. "The Demand Side Management Potential to Balance a Highly Renewable European Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    9. Jenkins, J.D. & Zhou, Z. & Ponciroli, R. & Vilim, R.B. & Ganda, F. & de Sisternes, F. & Botterud, A., 2018. "The benefits of nuclear flexibility in power system operations with renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 872-884.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haonan Zhang & Xingping Zhang & Jiahai Yuan, 2020. "Coal power in China: A multi‐level perspective review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(6), November.
    2. Lu, Nianci & Pan, Lei & Liu, Zhenxiang & Song, Yajun & Si, Paiyou, 2021. "Flexible operation control strategy for thermos-exchanger water level of two-by-one combined cycle gas turbine based on heat network storage utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    3. Jiaomin Liu & Tong Guo & Yue Wang & Yonggang Li & Shanshan Xu, 2020. "Multi-Technical Flexibility Retrofit Planning of Thermal Power Units Considering High Penetration Variable Renewable Energy: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Liu, Zecheng & Zhong, Wenqi & Shao, Yingjuan & Liu, Xuejiao, 2022. "Conceptual design of a small-capacity supercritical CO2 coal-fired circulating fluidized bed boiler by an improved design calculation method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    5. Lin, Boqiang & Liu, Zhiwei, 2024. "Assessment of China's flexible power investment value in the emission trading system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    6. Fan, Haojie & Xu, Wei & Zhang, Jian & Zhang, Zhongxiao, 2021. "Steam temperature regulation characteristics in a flexible ultra-supercritical boiler with a double reheat cycle based on a cell model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beiron, Johanna & Montañés, Rubén M. & Normann, Fredrik & Johnsson, Filip, 2020. "Flexible operation of a combined cycle cogeneration plant – A techno-economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    2. Jianjun Wang & Jikun Huo & Shuo Zhang & Yun Teng & Li Li & Taoya Han, 2021. "Flexibility Transformation Decision-Making Evaluation of Coal-Fired Thermal Power Units Deep Peak Shaving in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Jun Zhao & Bo Shen, 2019. "The Strategies for Improving Energy Efficiency of Power System with Increasing Share of Wind Power in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Dianfa Wu & Zhiping Yang & Ningling Wang & Chengzhou Li & Yongping Yang, 2018. "An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model and AHP Weighting Uncertainty Analysis for Sustainability Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Units," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-27, May.
    5. Andrychowicz, Mateusz & Olek, Blazej & Przybylski, Jakub, 2017. "Review of the methods for evaluation of renewable energy sources penetration and ramping used in the Scenario Outlook and Adequacy Forecast 2015. Case study for Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 703-714.
    6. Stinner, Sebastian & Huchtemann, Kristian & Müller, Dirk, 2016. "Quantifying the operational flexibility of building energy systems with thermal energy storages," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 140-154.
    7. Hong, Feng & Wang, Rui & Song, Jie & Gao, Mingming & Liu, Jizhen & Long, Dongteng, 2022. "A performance evaluation framework for deep peak shaving of the CFB boiler unit based on the DBN-LSSVM algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    8. Oree, Vishwamitra & Sayed Hassen, Sayed Z., 2016. "A composite metric for assessing flexibility available in conventional generators of power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 683-691.
    9. Heydarian-Forushani, E. & Golshan, M.E.H. & Siano, Pierluigi, 2017. "Evaluating the benefits of coordinated emerging flexible resources in electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 142-154.
    10. Neshumayev, Dmitri & Rummel, Leo & Konist, Alar & Ots, Arvo & Parve, Teet, 2018. "Power plant fuel consumption rate during load cycling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 124-135.
    11. Wang, Chaoyang & Zhao, Yongliang & Liu, Ming & Qiao, Yongqiang & Chong, Daotong & Yan, Junjie, 2018. "Peak shaving operational optimization of supercritical coal-fired power plants by revising control strategy for water-fuel ratio," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 212-223.
    12. Chang-Gi Min & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2017. "Net Load Carrying Capability of Generating Units in Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    13. Cheng, Chuntian & Su, Chengguo & Wang, Peilin & Shen, Jianjian & Lu, Jianyu & Wu, Xinyu, 2018. "An MILP-based model for short-term peak shaving operation of pumped-storage hydropower plants serving multiple power grids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 722-733.
    14. Yuan, Wenlin & Xin, Wenpeng & Su, Chengguo & Cheng, Chuntian & Yan, Denghua & Wu, Zening, 2022. "Cross-regional integrated transmission of wind power and pumped-storage hydropower considering the peak shaving demands of multiple power grids," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1112-1126.
    15. Zhao, Yongliang & Wang, Chaoyang & Liu, Ming & Chong, Daotong & Yan, Junjie, 2018. "Improving operational flexibility by regulating extraction steam of high-pressure heaters on a 660 MW supercritical coal-fired power plant: A dynamic simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1295-1309.
    16. Li, Mingquan & Shan, Rui & Virguez, Edgar & Patiño-Echeverri, Dalia & Gao, Shuo & Ma, Haichao, 2022. "Energy storage reduces costs and emissions even without large penetration of renewable energy: The case of China Southern Power Grid," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    17. Mikkola, Jani & Lund, Peter D., 2016. "Modeling flexibility and optimal use of existing power plants with large-scale variable renewable power schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 364-375.
    18. Zhao, Yongliang & Liu, Ming & Wang, Chaoyang & Li, Xin & Chong, Daotong & Yan, Junjie, 2018. "Increasing operational flexibility of supercritical coal-fired power plants by regulating thermal system configuration during transient processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 2375-2386.
    19. Garðarsdóttir, Stefanía Ó. & Göransson, Lisa & Normann, Fredrik & Johnsson, Filip, 2018. "Improving the flexibility of coal-fired power generators: Impact on the composition of a cost-optimal electricity system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 277-289.
    20. Lin, Boqiang & Liu, Zhiwei, 2024. "Assessment of China's flexible power investment value in the emission trading system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:16:p:4424-:d:258114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.