IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i15p4237-d255016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Warranty Period Decision and Coordination in Closed-Loop Supply Chains Considering Remanufacturing and Consumer Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaodong Zhu

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Lingfei Yu

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Wei Li

    (ChangWang School of Honors, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

Abstract

The closed-loop supply chain management model is an effective way to promote sustainable economic development and environmental protection. Increasing the sales volume of remanufactured products to stimulate green growth is a key issue in the development of closed-loop supply chains. By designing an effective warranty strategy, customer’s perceived value can be enhanced and market demand can be stimulated. This study cuts through the warranty period of closed-loop supply chain products. Based on the perspective of consumer behavior, game theory is used to construct the optimal decision-making model for closed-loop supply chains. The optimal warranty decision making for new products and remanufactured products under centralized and decentralized decision-making models is discussed. Further, the impact of the closed-loop supply chain system with warranty services and the design of contract coordination is also shown. We show that consumer preference has a positive impact on the sales of remanufactured products and the profits of enterprises; with the extension of the new product and remanufacturing warranty period, the profit of the supply chain system first increases and then decreases, and the value is maximized at the extreme point in the manufacturer-led decision-making model. Furthermore, the leader gains higher profits with bargaining power, but the profit of the supply chain system under decentralized decision model is less than that of the centralized decision model, reflecting the double marginalization effect. The revenue sharing contract and the two-charge contract designed in this study coordinate the closed-loop supply chain system with warranty services, so that the member companies in the supply chain can achieve Pareto improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaodong Zhu & Lingfei Yu & Wei Li, 2019. "Warranty Period Decision and Coordination in Closed-Loop Supply Chains Considering Remanufacturing and Consumer Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4237-:d:255016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4237/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4237/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yucai Wu & Jiguang Wang & Changhong Li, 2019. "Decisions of Supply Chain Considering Chain-to-Chain Competition and Service Negative Spillover Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Pietro Giovanni & Georges Zaccour, 2019. "A selective survey of game-theoretic models of closed-loop supply chains," 4OR, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-44, March.
    3. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    4. Wang, Jinting & Zhou, Zhuang & Peng, Hao, 2017. "Flexible decision models for a two-dimensional warranty policy with periodic preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 14-27.
    5. Sadok Turki & Nidhal Rezg, 2018. "Impact of the Quality of Returned-Used Products on the Optimal Design of a Manufacturing/Remanufacturing System under Carbon Emissions Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Xiaofei Lv & Xiaoli Lu & Guo Fu & Chunyou Wu, 2018. "A Spatial-Temporal Approach to Evaluate the Dynamic Evolution of Green Growth in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Esmaeili, M. & Shamsi Gamchi, N. & Asgharizadeh, E., 2014. "Three-level warranty service contract among manufacturer, agent and customer: A game-theoretical approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 177-186.
    8. Mai, Dung T. & Liu, Tieming & Morris, Michael D.S. & Sun, Shuzhen, 2017. "Quality coordination with extended warranty for store-brand products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(2), pages 524-532.
    9. Bifeng Liao & Bangyi Li, 2016. "Warranty as an Effective Strategy for Remanufactured Product," International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), IGI Global, vol. 9(1), pages 41-57, January.
    10. Lei, Yong & Liu, Qian & Shum, Stephen, 2017. "Warranty pricing with consumer learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 596-610.
    11. Laurens G. Debo & L. Beril Toktay & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2005. "Market Segmentation and Product Technology Selection for Remanufacturable Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1193-1205, August.
    12. Wu, Cheng-Han, 2018. "Price competition and technology licensing in a dynamic duopoly," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 570-584.
    13. Luo, Zheng & Chen, Xu & Chen, Jing & Wang, Xiaojun, 2017. "Optimal pricing policies for differentiated brands under different supply chain power structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 437-451.
    14. Genc, Talat S. & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2018. "Optimal return and rebate mechanism in a closed-loop supply chain game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 661-681.
    15. R. Canan Savaskan & Shantanu Bhattacharya & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2004. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 239-252, February.
    16. Laura Talens Peiró & Fulvio Ardente & Fabrice Mathieux, 2017. "Design for Disassembly Criteria in EU Product Policies for a More Circular Economy: A Method for Analyzing Battery Packs in PC-Tablets and Subnotebooks," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(3), pages 731-741, June.
    17. Bifeng Liao & Bangyi Li, 2016. "Warranty as an Effective Strategy for Remanufactured Product," International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), IGI Global, vol. 9(3), pages 83-98, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rocío González-Sánchez & Davide Settembre-Blundo & Anna Maria Ferrari & Fernando E. García-Muiña, 2020. "Main Dimensions in the Building of the Circular Supply Chain: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Peng Xing & Junzhu Yao, 2022. "Power Battery Echelon Utilization and Recycling Strategy for New Energy Vehicles Based on Blockchain Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Yuan, Yanhong & Yang, Jinyao & Li, Yang & Li, Wei, 2020. "Necessary conditions for coordination of dual-channel closed-loop supply chain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaodong Zhu & Lingfei Yu, 2019. "The Impact of Warranty Efficiency of Remanufactured Products on Production Decisions and Green Growth Performance in Closed-Loop Supply Chain: Perspective of Consumer Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, March.
    2. He, Qidong & Wang, Nengmin & Browning, Tyson R. & Jiang, Bin, 2022. "Competitive collection with convenience-perceived customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 239-254.
    3. Xiaodong Zhu & Lingfei Yu & Ji Zhang & Chenliang Li & Yizhao Zhao, 2018. "Warranty Decision Model and Remanufacturing Coordination Mechanism in Closed-Loop Supply Chain: View from a Consumer Behavior Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Pietro De Giovanni & Georges Zaccour, 2022. "A selective survey of game-theoretic models of closed-loop supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(1), pages 77-116, July.
    5. Ansaripoor, Amir H. & Oliveira, Fernando S. & Liret, Anne, 2014. "A risk management system for sustainable fleet replacement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 701-712.
    6. Abhishek Srivastava & Abhishek Chakraborty & Arqum Mateen, 2022. "Role of power imbalance on channel coordination under greening investments," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(4), pages 1522-1554, December.
    7. Ehsan Shekarian & Simme Douwe Flapper, 2021. "Analyzing the Structure of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    8. Qingyuan Zhu & Chenghao Yu & Zhiyang SHEN & Malin Song, 2023. "Competition between a manufacturer and a relicensing third party when customers are strategic," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2021-2040, June.
    9. Ying Wu & Youwei Li, 2022. "Competition or Authorization—Manufacturers’ Choice of Remanufacturing Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, October.
    10. Ramani, Vinay & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2017. "A two-period model of product cannibalization in an atypical Closed-loop Supply Chain with endogenous returns: The case of DellReconnect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1009-1027.
    11. De Giovanni, Pietro & Zaccour, Georges, 2014. "A two-period game of a closed-loop supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 22-40.
    12. Jie Deng & Xuwei Luo & Mengsi Hu, 2022. "Implications of a Carbon Tax Mechanism in Remanufacturing Outsourcing on Carbon Neutrality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-21, May.
    13. Deishin Lee, 2012. "Turning Waste into By-Product," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 115-127, January.
    14. Jiafu Su & Chi Li & Qingjun Zeng & Jiaquan Yang & Jie Zhang, 2019. "A Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Coordination Mechanism Based on Third-Party Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    15. Chenghao Lai & Xiuli Wang & Hengkai Li & Yanbing Zhou, 2024. "Unleashing the Power of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Stackelberg Game Analysis of Rare Earth Resources Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-23, June.
    16. Deepak Singhal & Sarat Kumar Jena & Satyabrata Aich & Sushanta Tripathy & Hee-Cheol Kim, 2021. "Remanufacturing for Circular Economy: Understanding the Impact of Manufacturer’s Incentive under Price Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Xiong, Yu & Zhou, Yu & Li, Gendao & Chan, Hing-Kai & Xiong, Zhongkai, 2013. "Don’t forget your supplier when remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 15-25.
    18. Frota Neto, João Quariguasi & Bloemhof, Jacqueline & Corbett, Charles, 2016. "Market prices of remanufactured, used and new items: Evidence from eBay," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P3), pages 371-380.
    19. Wu, Xiaole & Zhou, Yu, 2019. "Buyer-specific versus uniform pricing in a closed-loop supply chain with third-party remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 548-560.
    20. Xiaofeng Long & Tong Shu & Shou Chen & Shouyang Wang & Kin Keung Lai & Yan Yang, 2017. "Strategy Analysis of Recycling and Remanufacturing by Remanufacturers in Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-29, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4237-:d:255016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.