IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p4899-d1410774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unleashing the Power of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Stackelberg Game Analysis of Rare Earth Resources Recycling

Author

Listed:
  • Chenghao Lai

    (School of Economics and Management, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China)

  • Xiuli Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China)

  • Hengkai Li

    (School of Civil and Surveying & Mapping Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China)

  • Yanbing Zhou

    (Information Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China)

Abstract

Due to the rapid development of the clean energy sector against the global backdrop of carbon emission reduction, the availability of rare earths is becoming scarce. The strategic recycling of rare earth resources serves the dual purpose of alleviating supply shortages and aligning with the global quest for carbon reduction and environmental preservation. This study establishes a second-level, closed-loop supply chain that includes a rare earth group (REG) that synergizes rare earth mining and smelting companies with rare earth material manufacturing companies, as well as a specialized rare earth recycler. The study considers three different recycling scenarios: the recycler only recycles oil sludge scrap (S1), the recycler only recycles end-of-life products (S2), and the recycler both recycles oil sludge scrap and end-of-life products (S3). In addition, the study examines the impact of government subsidies, carbon trading mechanisms, and corporate research and development (R&D) initiatives on closed-loop supply chains. The findings are summarized below. (1) Rare earth recycling does not impact the rare earth market downstream. (2) The profits of both REG and the recycler have a positive correlation with the quantity of recycling. However, recycling sludge waste can generate higher revenues for the recycler compared to recycling end-of-life products. (3) Government subsidies exert a positive effect on the recycler’s profits and the production of secondary rare earths. However, the REG redirects a segment of the recycler’s profits in its direction. Elevated carbon trading prices encroach upon the REG’s profitability, prompting increased procurement of secondary supply rare earths. (4) The benefits of increasing rare earth recycling rates outweigh government subsidies and carbon trading valuations in the supply chain. Therefore, enterprise-focused research and development initiatives play a critical role in improving the efficiency of the closed-loop rare earth supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenghao Lai & Xiuli Wang & Hengkai Li & Yanbing Zhou, 2024. "Unleashing the Power of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Stackelberg Game Analysis of Rare Earth Resources Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:4899-:d:1410774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/4899/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/4899/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Xiuli & Lai, Chenghao & Li, Hengkai & Zhang, Zheyuan, 2023. "A tripartite game analysis of public participation in environmental regulation of ionic rare earth mining areas," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Machacek, Erika & Richter, Jessika Luth & Habib, Komal & Klossek, Polina, 2015. "Recycling of rare earths from fluorescent lamps: Value analysis of closing-the-loop under demand and supply uncertainties," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 76-93.
    3. R. Canan Savaskan & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2006. "Reverse Channel Design: The Case of Competing Retailers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Genc, Talat S. & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2018. "Optimal return and rebate mechanism in a closed-loop supply chain game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 661-681.
    5. R. Canan Savaskan & Shantanu Bhattacharya & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2004. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 239-252, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Qidong & Wang, Nengmin & Browning, Tyson R. & Jiang, Bin, 2022. "Competitive collection with convenience-perceived customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 239-254.
    2. Deepak Singhal & Sarat Kumar Jena & Satyabrata Aich & Sushanta Tripathy & Hee-Cheol Kim, 2021. "Remanufacturing for Circular Economy: Understanding the Impact of Manufacturer’s Incentive under Price Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Dou, Guowei & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Does implementing trade-in and green technology together benefit the environment?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 517-533.
    4. Pietro De Giovanni & Georges Zaccour, 2022. "A selective survey of game-theoretic models of closed-loop supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(1), pages 77-116, July.
    5. Quanxi Li & Haowei Zhang & Kailing Liu, 2021. "Research on Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision-Making in Different Cooperation Modes with Government’s Reward-Penalty Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Benrong Zheng & Liang Jin & Guoxuan Huang & Jie Chu, 2023. "Retailer’s optimal CSR investment in closed-loop supply chains: the impacts of supply chain structure and channel power structure," 4OR, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 301-327, June.
    7. Ehsan Shekarian & Simme Douwe Flapper, 2021. "Analyzing the Structure of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    8. Liu, Wenjie & Liu, Wei & Shen, Ningning & Xu, Zhitao & Xie, Naiming & Chen, Jian & Zhou, Huiyu, 2022. "Pricing and collection decisions of a closed-loop supply chain with fuzzy demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    9. Bo Wang & Ning Wang, 2022. "Decision Models for a Dual-Recycling Channel Reverse Supply Chain with Consumer Strategic Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Ramani, Vinay & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2017. "A two-period model of product cannibalization in an atypical Closed-loop Supply Chain with endogenous returns: The case of DellReconnect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1009-1027.
    11. Guojun Ji & Zhongfeng Sun & Kim Hua Tan, 2021. "Collaborative Rebate Strategy of Business-to-Customer Platforms Considering Recycling and Trade-Ins Simultaneously," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chow, Pui-Sze & Lee, Chang Hwan & Shen, Bin, 2018. "Used intimate apparel collection programs: A game-theoretic analytical study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 44-62.
    13. De Giovanni, Pietro & Zaccour, Georges, 2014. "A two-period game of a closed-loop supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 22-40.
    14. Emad Sane-Zerang & Jafar Razmi & Ata Allah Taleizadeh, 2020. "Coordination in a closed-loop supply chain under asymmetric and symmetric information with sales effort-dependent demand," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 303-334, March.
    15. Qiyao Liu & Xiaodong Zhu, 2024. "Incentive strategies for retired power battery closed-loop supply chain considering corporate social responsibility," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 19013-19050, July.
    16. Zhang, Abraham & Wang, Jason X. & Farooque, Muhammad & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    17. Haitao Chen & Zhaohui Dong & Gendao Li, 2020. "Government Reward-Penalty Mechanism in Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Jie Deng & Xuwei Luo & Mengsi Hu, 2022. "Implications of a Carbon Tax Mechanism in Remanufacturing Outsourcing on Carbon Neutrality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Yanting Huang & Zongjun Wang, 2017. "Dual-Recycling Channel Decision in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Cost Disruptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-28, November.
    20. Jian Li & Weihao Du & Fengmei Yang & Guowei Hua, 2014. "The Carbon Subsidy Analysis in Remanufacturing Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:4899-:d:1410774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.