IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i13p3731-d246633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of an Innovative Land Valuation Model (iLVM) for Mass Appraisal Application in Sub-Urban Areas Using AHP: An Integration of Theoretical and Practical Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Jannet C. Bencure

    (Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System, School of Engineering Technology, Asian Institute of Technology, 58 Moo 9, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

  • Nitin K. Tripathi

    (Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System, School of Engineering Technology, Asian Institute of Technology, 58 Moo 9, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

  • Hiroyuki Miyazaki

    (Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System, School of Engineering Technology, Asian Institute of Technology, 58 Moo 9, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

  • Sarawut Ninsawat

    (Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System, School of Engineering Technology, Asian Institute of Technology, 58 Moo 9, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

  • Sohee Minsun Kim

    (Department of Development and Sustainability, School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, 58 Moo 9, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand)

Abstract

Land development in sub-urban areas is more frequent than in highly urbanized cities, causing land prices to increase abruptly and making it harder for valuers to update land values in timely manner. Apart from this, the non-availability of sufficient reliable market values forces valuers to use alternatives and subjective judgement. Land value is critical not only for private individuals but also for government agencies in their day-to-day land dealings. Thus, mass appraisal is necessary. In other words, despite the importance of reliable land value in all aspects of land administration, valuation remains disorganized, with unregulated undertakings that lack concrete scientific, legal, and practical foundations. A holistic and objective way of weighing geospatial factors through expert consultation, legal reviews, and evidence (i.e., news) will provide more realistic results than a regression-based method that does not comprehend valuation factors (i.e., physical, social, economic, environmental, and legal aspects). The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) enables these factors to be included in the model, hence providing a realistic result. The innovative land valuation model (iLVM), developed in this study, is an inclusive approach wherein experts are involved in the selection and weighing of 15 factors through the AHP. The model was validated using root mean squared error (RMSE) and compared with multiple regression analysis (MRA) through a case study in Baybay City, Philippines. Based on the results, the iLVM (RMSE = 0.526) outperformed MRA (RMSE = 1.953).

Suggested Citation

  • Jannet C. Bencure & Nitin K. Tripathi & Hiroyuki Miyazaki & Sarawut Ninsawat & Sohee Minsun Kim, 2019. "Development of an Innovative Land Valuation Model (iLVM) for Mass Appraisal Application in Sub-Urban Areas Using AHP: An Integration of Theoretical and Practical Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3731-:d:246633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3731/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3731/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marija Bogataj & Danijela Tuljak Suban & Samo Drobne, 2011. "Regression-fuzzy approach to land valuation," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 19(3), pages 253-265, September.
    2. Aragones-Beltran, P. & Aznar, J. & Ferris-Onate, J. & Garcia-Melon, M., 2008. "Valuation of urban industrial land: An analytic network process approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 322-339, February.
    3. John Kilpatrick, 2011. "Expert systems and mass appraisal," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(4/5), pages 529-550, July.
    4. Cotteleer, Geerte & Stobbe, Tracy & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2008. "A Spatial Bayesian Hedonic Pricing Model of Farmland Values," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44137, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Rainer Schulz & Martin Wersing & Axel Werwatz, 2014. "Automated valuation modelling: a specification exercise," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 131-153, June.
    6. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. & Kumar, Sushil, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 1-29, February.
    7. Pia Nilsson & Sara Johansson, 2013. "Location determinants of agricultural land prices," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Leah J. Tsoodle & Allen M. Featherstone & Bill B. Golden, 2007. "Combining hedonic and negative exponential techniques to estimate the market value of land," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 67(2), pages 225-239, November.
    9. Ma, Shan & Swinton, Scott M., 2011. "Valuation of ecosystem services from rural landscapes using agricultural land prices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1649-1659, July.
    10. Antipov, Evgeny & Pokryshevskaya, Elena, 2010. "Mass appraisal of residential apartments: An application of Random forest for valuation and a CART-based approach for model diagnostics," MPRA Paper 27645, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elena Bykowa & Maria Hełdak & Julia Sishchuk, 2020. "Cadastral Land Value Modelling Based on Zoning by Prestige: A Case Study of a Resort Town," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Thanh Le Huu Ngoc & Ngu Nguyen Huu, 2024. "Application of Hedonic Model to Determine Residential Land Valuation in Suburban Areas: The Case of Hue City, Vietnam," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 32(2), pages 70-79.
    3. Unel, Fatma Bunyan & Yalpir, Sukran, 2023. "Sustainable tax system design for use of mass real estate appraisal in land management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    4. Ela Ertunç & Zlatica Muchová & Hrvoje Tomić & Jaroslaw Janus, 2022. "Legal, Procedural and Social Aspects of Land Valuation in Land Consolidation: A Comparative Study for Selected Central and Eastern Europe Countries and Turkey," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ritter, Matthias & Hüttel, Silke & Odening, Martin & Seifert, Stefan, 2020. "Revisiting the relationship between land price and parcel size in agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. J Aznar & J Ferrís-Oñate & F Guijarro, 2010. "An ANP framework for property pricing combining quantitative and qualitative attributes," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(5), pages 740-755, May.
    3. Chen, Shuo-Pei & Wu, Wann-Yih, 2010. "A systematic procedure to evaluate an automobile manufacturer-distributor partnership," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 687-698, September.
    4. Miriam Steurer & Robert Hill, 2019. "Metrics for Evaluating the Performance of Automated Valuation Models," Graz Economics Papers 2019-02, University of Graz, Department of Economics.
    5. Cortés-Aldana, Félix Antonio & García-Melón, Mónica & Fernández-de-Lucio, Ignacio & Aragonés-Beltrán, Pablo & Poveda-Bautista, Rocío, 2009. "University objectives and socioeconomic results: A multicriteria measuring of alignment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(3), pages 811-822, December.
    6. Sebastian Gnat & Mariusz Doszyn, 2020. "Parametric and Non-parametric Methods in Mass Appraisal on Poorly Developed Real Estate Markets," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1230-1245.
    7. Kheybari, Siamak & Rezaie, Fariba Mahdi & Farazmand, Hadis, 2020. "Analytic network process: An overview of applications," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    8. Daikun Wang & Victor Jing Li, 2019. "Mass Appraisal Models of Real Estate in the 21st Century: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Demetris Demetriou, 2017. "A spatially based artificial neural network mass valuation model for land consolidation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(5), pages 864-883, September.
    10. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.
    11. Nina Almasifar & Tülay Özdemir Canbolat & Milad Akhavan & Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano, 2021. "Proposing a New Methodology for Monument Conservation “SCOPE MANAGEMENT” by the Use of an Analytic Hierarchy Process Project Management Institute System and the ICOMOS Burra Charter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    12. Jitendar Kumar Khatri & Bhimaraya Metri, 2016. "SWOT-AHP Approach for Sustainable Manufacturing Strategy Selection: A Case of Indian SME," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(5), pages 1211-1226, October.
    13. Narula, Subhash C. & Wellington, John F. & Lewis, Stephen A., 2012. "Valuating residential real estate using parametric programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 120-128.
    14. Sushil, 2019. "Efficient interpretive ranking process incorporating implicit and transitive dominance relationships," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1489-1516, December.
    15. Wang, Ying-Ming & Elhag, Taha M.S., 2007. "A goal programming method for obtaining interval weights from an interval comparison matrix," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 458-471, February.
    16. Patrick Krieger & Carsten Lausberg, 2021. "Entscheidungen, Entscheidungsfindung und Entscheidungsunterstützung in der Immobilienwirtschaft: Eine systematische Literaturübersicht [Decisions, decision-making and decisions support systems in r," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 7(1), pages 1-33, April.
    17. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    18. Lim, Chulmin & Rowsell, Joe & Kim, Seongcheol, 2023. "Exploring the killer domains to create new value: A Comparative case study of Canadian and Korean telcos," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277998, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    19. Ritter, Matthias & Huttel, Silke & Odening, Martin & Seifert, Stefan, 2019. "Revisiting The Relationship Between Land Price And Parcel Size," 2019 Conference (63rd), February 12-15, 2019, Melbourne, Australia 285062, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society (AARES).
    20. Ho, William, 2008. "Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 211-228, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3731-:d:246633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.