IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i12p3391-d241294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Circular Economy and Resilience Thinking for Historic Urban Landscape Regeneration: The Case of Torre Annunziata, Naples

Author

Listed:
  • Katia Fabbricatti

    (Department of Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, 80135 Naples, Italy)

  • Paolo Franco Biancamano

    (Department of Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, 80135 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

The landscape, as an archive of the traces of the history of man and nature, can be considered a holistic indicator of sustainable, inclusive, safe, resilient cities as set out in Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development. The UNESCO Recommendations on Historic Urban Landscape (HUL) reflect it as a dynamic/evolving system that changes over time to meet social needs: it requires to be managed in a sustainable way, not only as a resource to be preserved. The beauty of the landscape is a common element in the development policies of many small-medium European and Italian cities. However, the state of abandonment and decay, the lack of investments, of often emigrated skills are the detractors. The circular economy model applied to the HUL leads to the ability to maximize the value of settlements, activating social, economic and environmental synergies. The research identifies the relationship among Circularity, Productivity and Resilience as an effective key to achieve the goals of Agenda 2030. The methodological approach tested on the case study of Torre Annunziata, Naples has reached a system of resilience performance indicators to express the complex nature of HUL and define a scenario of circular regeneration, based on the recreation of a virtuous circuit between physical, environmental, social, economic systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Katia Fabbricatti & Paolo Franco Biancamano, 2019. "Circular Economy and Resilience Thinking for Historic Urban Landscape Regeneration: The Case of Torre Annunziata, Naples," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-29, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:12:p:3391-:d:241294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3391/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3391/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefania De Medici & Patrizia Riganti & Serena Viola, 2018. "Circular Economy and the Role of Universities in Urban Regeneration: The Case of Ortigia, Syracuse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-26, November.
    2. Wim Naude & Mark McGillivray & Stephanie Rossouw, 2009. "Measuring the Vulnerability of Subnational Regions in South Africa," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 249-276.
    3. repec:bla:devpol:v:25:y:2007:i:2:p:243-264 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Wim Naudé & Mark McGillivray & Stephanie Rossouw, 2008. "Measuring the Vulnerability of Subnational Regions," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2008-54, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Francesca Nocca, 2018. "Towards an Integrated Evaluation Approach for Cultural Urban Landscape Conservation/Regeneration," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 5, pages 33-51.
    6. Graeme Evans, 2005. "Measure for Measure: Evaluating the Evidence of Culture's Contribution to Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(5-6), pages 959-983, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Pesce & Ilaria Tamai & Deyan Guo & Andrea Critto & Daniele Brombal & Xiaohui Wang & Hongguang Cheng & Antonio Marcomini, 2020. "Circular Economy in China: Translating Principles into Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-31, January.
    2. Federica Paoli & Francesca Pirlone & Ilenia Spadaro, 2022. "Indicators for the Circular City: A Review and a Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-28, September.
    3. Grazia Sveva Ascione & Federico Cuomo & Nicole Mariotti & Laura Corazza, 2021. "Urban Living Labs, Circular Economy and Nature-Based Solutions: Ideation and Testing of a New Soil in the City of Turin Using a Multi-stakeholder Perspective," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 545-562, September.
    4. Shuang Wu & Ning Wu & Bo Zhong, 2020. "What Ecosystem Services Flowing from Linpan System—A Cultural Landscape in Chengdu Plain, Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Margarita Vološina & Evija Taurene & Pēteris Šķiņķis, 2023. "Towards Liveability in Historic Centres: Challenges and Enablers of Transformation in Two Latvian Towns," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 52-66.
    6. Shu-Yen Wang & Shyh-Huei Hwang, 2019. "Research on Field Reconstruction and Community Design of Living Settlements—An Example of Repairing a Fish Stove in the Hua-Zhai Settlement on Wang-An Island, Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-30, October.
    7. Zhehua Chen & Qing Xu & Xiangpin Zhou & Yanping Yang, 2023. "New Insights into the Layering Process of Urban Environment and Private Garden Transformations: A Case Study on the Bubbling Well Road Area in Early Modern Times, Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Montalbano, Pierluigi, 2011. "Trade Openness and Developing Countries' Vulnerability: Concepts, Misconceptions, and Directions for Research," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 1489-1502, September.
    2. HaeRan Shin & Quentin Stevens, 2013. "How Culture and Economy Meet in South Korea: The Politics of Cultural Economy in Culture-led Urban Regeneration," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1707-1723, September.
    3. Nadia Pintossi & Deniz Ikiz Kaya & Ana Pereira Roders, 2021. "Assessing Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse Practices: Multi-Scale Challenges and Solutions in Rijeka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Paolo Rizzi & Paola Graziano & Antonio Dallara, 2018. "A capacity approach to territorial resilience: the case of European regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 60(2), pages 285-328, March.
    5. IOVINO, Giorgia, 2017. "Waterfront Urbani: Approcci Rigenerativi e Visioni di Città," CELPE Discussion Papers 148, CELPE - CEnter for Labor and Political Economics, University of Salerno, Italy.
    6. Miguel Kanai & Iliana Ortega‐Alcázar, 2009. "The Prospects for Progressive Culture‐Led Urban Regeneration in Latin America: Cases from Mexico City and Buenos Aires," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 483-501, June.
    7. Tanguy, Marine & Kumar, Vishal, 2019. "Measuring the extent to which Londoners are willing to pay for public art in their city," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 301-311.
    8. Raghu Bir Bista, 2023. "Estimating the Impact of Adaptive Capacity on Vulnerability in Nepal," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 5(3), pages 300-305.
    9. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2022. "Effect of structural economic vulnerability on the participation in international trade," EconStor Preprints 262004, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    10. Richelle Winkler & Lorri Oikarinen & Heather Simpson & Melissa Michaelson & Mayra Sanchez Gonzalez, 2016. "Boom, Bust and Beyond: Arts and Sustainability in Calumet, Michigan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-25, March.
    11. Meghan Ashlin Rich & William Tsitsos, 2016. "Avoiding the ‘SoHo Effect’ in Baltimore: Neighborhood Revitalization and Arts and Entertainment Districts," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 736-756, July.
    12. Stefania De Medici & Pasquale De Toro & Francesca Nocca, 2019. "Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development: Impact Assessment of Two Adaptive Reuse Projects in Siracusa, Sicily," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Andrea Lucarelli, 2018. "Co-branding public place brands: towards an alternative approach to place branding," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(4), pages 260-271, November.
    14. Yi-De Liu, 2019. "Event and Sustainable Culture-Led Regeneration: Lessons from the 2008 European Capital of Culture, Liverpool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Sabatino, Michele, 2016. "Economic crisis and resilience: Resilient capacity and competitiveness of the enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1924-1927.
    16. Anda David & Nathalie Guilbert & Nobuaki Hamaguchi & Yudai Higashi & Hiroyuki Hino & Murray Leibbrandt & Muna Shifa, 2018. "Spatial poverty and inequality in South Africa: A municipality level analysis," SALDRU Working Papers 221, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.
    17. Djamel Boussaa, 2017. "Urban Regeneration and the Search for Identity in Historic Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Tomoki Fujii, 2016. "Concepts and measurement of vulnerability to poverty and other issues: a review of literature," Chapters, in: Jacques Silber & Guanghua Wan (ed.), The Asian ‘Poverty Miracle’, chapter 3, pages 53-83, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Andy Sumner & Rich Mallett, 2011. "Snakes and Ladders, Buffers and Passports: Rethinking Poverty, Vulnerability and Wellbeing," Working Papers 83, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    20. Maria Makabenta Ikeda & Arlene Garces-Ozanne, 2016. "Human Security, Social Competence and Natural Disasters in Japan and New Zealand: A Case study of Filipino migrants," Japan Social Innovation Journal, University of Hyogo Institute for Policy Analysis and Social Innovation, vol. 6(1), pages 1-42, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:12:p:3391-:d:241294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.