IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i10p2722-d230805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strengthening Food Security Near the Arctic Circle: Case Study of Fairbanks North Star Borough, Alaska

Author

Listed:
  • Robert W. Orttung

    (Sustainable GW and Elliott School of International Affairs, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA)

  • James Powell

    (Master of Public Administration Program, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Alaska, Southeast, Juneau, AK 99801, USA)

  • James Fox

    (Fairbanks North Star Borough Sustainability Commission; Fairbanks, AK 99701, USA)

  • Claire Franco

    (Department of Geography and Elliott School of International Affairs, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA)

Abstract

Reliable food supply is a central concern for residents of cities located in remote locations with extreme climate conditions. The purpose of this article is to examine how stake-holders in such northern cities ensure a high level of food security. We examine a case study of the Fairbanks North Star Borough, Alaska, which is located in the interior of the state near the Arctic Circle. Borough policymakers are seeking to address community concerns through a collaborative, multi-stakeholder process of working with local farmers, distributors, consumers, activists, and academics. We examine the effectiveness of this process through participant-observation and process tracing of the initial results of the newly established Fairbanks North Star Borough sustainability commission. The new commission has adopted a sustainability plan drawing upon the input of community stakeholders, but it remains to be seen how the plan will be implemented and if it will meet the needs of diverse groups within the community. This analysis makes a contribution by examining the hypothesis that university-based teams and public input can improve public policy outputs in the area of food security by organizing their work around a focus on data. Specifically, the article examines the most effective mechanisms for collaboration among academics and policymakers to incorporate public input into food security policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert W. Orttung & James Powell & James Fox & Claire Franco, 2019. "Strengthening Food Security Near the Arctic Circle: Case Study of Fairbanks North Star Borough, Alaska," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2722-:d:230805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2722/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/10/2722/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tausanovitch, Chris & Warshaw, Christopher, 2014. "Representation in Municipal Government," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 108(3), pages 605-641, August.
    2. Georges A. Tanguay & Juste Rajaonson & Jean-François Lefebvre & Paul Lanoie, 2009. "Measuring the Sustainability of Cities: A Survey-Based Analysis of the Use of Local Indicators," CIRANO Working Papers 2009s-02, CIRANO.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Warshawsky & Robert Vos, 2019. "Governing at Scale: Successful Local Food Initiatives in the World’s Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-4, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miriam Müller & Oscar Reutter, 2017. "Vision Development towards a Sustainable North Rhine-Westphalia 2030 in a Science-Practice-Dialogue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Wittman, Donald, 2024. "District versus at-large voting: Why district voting results in worse policy for minorities," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Thomas M. Koutsos & Georgios C. Menexes & Andreas P. Mamolos, 2021. "The Use of Crop Yield Autocorrelation Data as a Sustainable Approach to Adjust Agronomic Inputs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Aycan Katitas & Sonal Pandya, 2024. "Investment incentives attract foreign direct investment: evidence from the great recession," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 200(1), pages 323-345, July.
    5. Benedict S. Jimenez, 2017. "Institutional Constraints, Rule-Following, and Circumvention: Tax and Expenditure Limits and the Choice of Fiscal Tools During a Budget Crisis," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 5-34, June.
    6. Marie-Christine Therrien & Juste Rajaonson & Georges A. Tanguay, 2011. "Sustainable Tourism Indicators: Selection Criteria for Policy Implementation and Scientific Recognition," CIRANO Working Papers 2011s-60, CIRANO.
    7. Lerner, Joshua Y. & McCubbins, Mathew D. & Renberg, Kristen M., 2021. "The efficacy of measuring judicial ideal points: The mis-analogy of IRTs," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Makarin, Alexey & Piqué, Ricardo & Aragón, Fernando, 2020. "National or sub-national parties: Does party geographic scope matter?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    9. Corrado Lo Storto, 2016. "Ecological Efficiency Based Ranking of Cities: A Combined DEA Cross-Efficiency and Shannon’s Entropy Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-29, January.
    10. Hussain, Shahid & Ahonen, Valtteri & Karasu, Taha & Leviäkangas, Pekka, 2023. "Sustainability of smart rural mobility and tourism: A key performance indicators-based approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Köhler, Ekkehard & Matsusaka, John G. & Wu, Yanhui, 2023. "Street-level responsiveness of city governments in China, Germany, and the United States," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 640-652.
    12. Hanrui Zeng & Terence Tai-Leung Chong, 2018. "Does studying in Hong Kong affect the ideological preferences of Chinese mainland undergraduates?," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 431-444, October.
    13. Lucas, Jack, 2024. "Are Municipal Politicians Ideological Moderates?," OSF Preprints vq28b, Center for Open Science.
    14. Culver, Gregg, 2017. "Mobility and the making of the neoliberal “creative city”: The streetcar as a creative city project?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 22-30.
    15. Roberto Brunetti & Matthieu Pourieux, 2023. "Representative Policy-Makers? A Behavioral Experiment with French Politicians," Working Papers 2319, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    16. Juste Rajaonson & Georges A. Tanguay, 2010. "Le développement durable au Québec : classement des 25 plus grandes villes," CIRANO Project Reports 2010rp-10, CIRANO.
    17. Whittemore, Andrew H. & BenDor, Todd K., 2018. "Talking about density: An empirical investigation of framing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 181-191.
    18. Anthony P Cannizzaro & Robert J Weiner, 2018. "State ownership and transparency in foreign direct investment," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(2), pages 172-195, February.
    19. Seungyoon Lee & Bailey C. Benedict & Yue ‘Gurt’ Ge & Pamela Murray‐Tuite & Satish V. Ukkusuri, 2021. "An application of media and network multiplexity theory to the structure and perceptions of information environments in hurricane evacuation," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(7), pages 885-900, July.
    20. David Switzer, 2020. "The Context of Responsiveness: Resident Preferences, Water Scarcity, and Municipal Conservation Policy," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(2), pages 260-279, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:2722-:d:230805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.