IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2018i1p113-d193245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spent FCC E-Cat: Towards a Circular Approach in the Oil Refining Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Ferella

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Information and Economics, University of L’Aquila, Via G. Gronchi 18, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Idiano D’Adamo

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Information and Economics, University of L’Aquila, Via G. Gronchi 18, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Simona Leone

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Information and Economics, University of L’Aquila, Via G. Gronchi 18, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Valentina Innocenzi

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Information and Economics, University of L’Aquila, Via G. Gronchi 18, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Ida De Michelis

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Information and Economics, University of L’Aquila, Via G. Gronchi 18, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Francesco Vegliò

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Information and Economics, University of L’Aquila, Via G. Gronchi 18, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

Abstract

Every year the oil refining industry consumes thousand tons of fluid catalytic cracking zeolite from the E-cat generated in the fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit. In the present paper, a new process for recycling of fluid catalytic cracking catalysts (FCCCs) is presented. The process, previously tested at laboratory scale, was simulated by SuperPro Designer catalysts (FCCCs, also known as equilibrium catalysts, E-cat), which are mainly landfilled. Their intrinsic value is quite low and the content of rare earth elements (REEs), as lanthanum and cerium oxides, is around 3%wt. Moreover, their reuse in other industrial processes as raw material is very scarce. For each metric ton of spent FCCC treated for recovery of REEs, nearly the same amount of waste is generated from the process, the majority of which is represented by the solid residue resulting from the leaching stage. The manuscript presents a technological study and an economic analysis for the recovery of REEs, as well as the production of synthetic © software package. The plant was designed for a capacity of 4000 metric tons per year. The discounted cash flow (DCF) method was applied and Net Present Value (NPV) equal to about two-million € and Discounted Payback Time (DPBT) equal to two years defined the profitability of the process for recycling of FCCCs. This result depends on the selling price of zeolite. Consequently, a break-even point (BEP) analysis was conducted on this critical variable and the condition of economic feasibility was verified with a price of 1070 €/ton. This study tried to implement recycling strategies towards circular economy models.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Ferella & Idiano D’Adamo & Simona Leone & Valentina Innocenzi & Ida De Michelis & Francesco Vegliò, 2018. "Spent FCC E-Cat: Towards a Circular Approach in the Oil Refining Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:113-:d:193245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/113/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/113/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Idiano D’Adamo & Paolo Rosa & Sergio Terzi, 2016. "Challenges in Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Management: A Profitability Assessment in Three European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Xibo Wang & Mingtao Yao & Jiashuo Li & Kexue Zhang & He Zhu & Minsi Zheng, 2017. "China’s Rare Earths Production Forecasting and Sustainable Development Policy Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Isabel Banos-Gonzalez & Julia Martínez-Fernández & Miguel-Ángel Esteve-Selma & Patricia Esteve-Guirao, 2018. "Sensitivity Analysis in Socio-Ecological Models as a Tool in Environmental Policy for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-30, August.
    4. Abd El-Azeem Sallam & Mateb S. Al-Zahrani & Mohammad I. Al-Wabel & Abdullah S. Al-Farraj & Adel R. A. Usman, 2017. "Removal of Cr(VI) and Toxic Ions from Aqueous Solutions and Tannery Wastewater Using Polymer-Clay Composites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Xuedong Liang & Meng Ye & Li Yang & Wanbing Fu & Zhi Li, 2018. "Evaluation and Policy Research on the Sustainable Development of China’s Rare Earth Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Carla Costa & José Carlos Marques, 2018. "Feasibility of Eco-Friendly Binary and Ternary Blended Binders Made of Fly-Ash and Oil-Refinery Spent Catalyst in Ready-Mixed Concrete Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fernando E. García-Muiña & María Sonia Medina-Salgado & Anna Maria Ferrari & Marco Cucchi, 2020. "Sustainability Transition in Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing with the Triple-Layered Business Model Canvas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Amato, A. & Becci, A. & Birloaga, I. & De Michelis, I. & Ferella, F. & Innocenzi, V. & Ippolito, N.M. & Pillar Jimenez Gomez, C. & Vegliò, F. & Beolchini, F., 2019. "Sustainability analysis of innovative technologies for the rare earth elements recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 41-53.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mattia Cottes & Matia Mainardis & Patrizia Simeoni, 2023. "Assessing the Techno-Economic Feasibility of Waste Electric and Electronic Equipment Treatment Plant: A Multi-Decisional Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Cherepovitsyn, Alexey & Solovyova, Victoria & Dmitrieva, Diana, 2023. "New challenges for the sustainable development of the rare-earth metals sector in Russia: Transforming industrial policies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Thibeault, Al & Ryder, Michael & Tomomewo, Olusegun & Mann, Michael, 2023. "A review of competitive advantage theory applied to the global rare earth industry transition," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    4. Zeynep Ozsut Bogar & Askiner Gungor, 2023. "Forecasting Waste Mobile Phone (WMP) Quantity and Evaluating the Potential Contribution to the Circular Economy: A Case Study of Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-38, February.
    5. Zuluaga-Guerra, Paula Andrea & Martinez-Fernandez, Julia & Esteve-Selma, Miguel Angel & Dell'Angelo, Jampel, 2023. "A socio-ecological model of the Segura River basin, Spain," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).
    6. Leng, Zhihui & Sun, Han & Cheng, Jinhua & Wang, Hai & Yao, Zhen, 2021. "China's rare earth industry technological innovation structure and driving factors: A social network analysis based on patents," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    7. Huang, Xiaobing & Xie, Jiawei, 2024. "The impact of input efficiency on the value chain embeddedness of rare earth enterprises," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 604-616.
    8. Ksenija Denčić-Mihajlov & Mladen Krstić & Dejan Spasić, 2020. "Sensitivity Analysis as a Tool in Environmental Policy for Sustainability: The Case of Waste Recycling Projects in the Republic of Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Hilal Shams & Altaf Hossain Molla & Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman & Hawa Hishamuddin & Zambri Harun & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar, 2023. "Exploring Industry-Specific Research Themes on E-Waste: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Yanjing Jia & Chao Ding & Zhiliang Dong, 2021. "Transmission Mechanism of Stock Price Fluctuation in the Rare Earth Industry Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    11. Jianyun Chen & Wenxing Zhu & Xianping Luo, 2022. "Government Reserve of Rare Earths under Total Quota Management: An Interactive Game between Government and Rare-Earth Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Caill-Milly, N. & Garmendia, J. Bald & D'Amico, F. & Guyader, O. & Dang, C. & Bru, N., 2022. "Adapting a dynamic system model using life traits and local fishery knowledge — Application to a population of exploited marine bivalves (Ruditapes philippinarum) in a mesotidal coastal lagoon," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 470(C).
    13. Mohd Helmi Ali & Suhaiza Zailani & Mohammad Iranmanesh & Behzad Foroughi, 2019. "Impacts of Environmental Factors on Waste, Energy, and Resource Management and Sustainable Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Ghassim, Babak & Foss, Lene, 2021. "Understanding the micro-foundations of internal capabilities for open innovation in the minerals industry: a holistic sustainability perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    15. Alberto Sardi & Enrico Sorano, 2019. "Dynamic Performance Management: An Approach for Managing the Common Goods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Guangzhou Yan & Yaodong Ni & Xiangfeng Yang, 2020. "Optimal Pricing in Recycling and Remanufacturing in Uncertain Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Beáta Stehlíková & Katarína Čulková & Marcela Taušová & Ľubomír Štrba & Eva Mihaliková, 2021. "Evaluation of Communal Waste in Slovakia from the View of Chosen Economic Indicators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Qingduo Mao & Manli Zhang & Ben Ma, 2018. "Benefit and Risk Perceptions of Controversial Facilities: A Comparison between Local Officials and the Public in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Ana D. Maldonado & Darío Ramos-López & Pedro A. Aguilera, 2018. "A Comparison of Machine-Learning Methods to Select Socioeconomic Indicators in Cultural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    20. Patrizia Ghisellini & Ivana Quinto & Renato Passaro & Sergio Ulgiati, 2023. "Circular Economy Management of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) in Italian Urban Systems: Comparison and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:113-:d:193245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.