IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i7p2456-d157883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Innovative Approach to Determining High-Risk Nodes in a Complex Urban Rail Transit Station: A Perspective of Promoting Urban Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Xu

    (School of Economics and Management, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China)

  • Liudan Jiao

    (School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

  • Shulin Chen

    (School of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China)

  • Milan Deng

    (School of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China)

  • Ningxin Shen

    (School of Economics and Management, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China)

Abstract

Public safety presents high importance in urban sustainable development. Transportation safety is a significant section in public safety. Over the last couple of decades, as a sustainable means of public transportation, urban rail transit presents a rapid development in China. Increasing initiatives and practices have been engaged with views to facilitating people’s travel and intensive utilizing land resources. Echoing this, rail transit stations with multi-floor structure have been built and show structure complexity. Due to this complexity, there is a need to focus on risk management for the stations to guarantee operation safety. Accordingly, this research introduces an innovative approach to identify high-risk nodes in the complex rail transit stations. The high-risk nodes are determined according to two aspects, which are the key nodes of the station and presenting large passenger volumes. Complex network analysis and field investigation were adopted in this study. The Lianglukou rail transit station in Chongqing, China was selected for case study. The research results in this study indicate that (1) in platform floors, stairs/escalators are almost high-risk nodes; (2) columns and metal fences that have been determined as high-risk nodes are located near stairs/escalators; (3) in concourse floor, the determined high-risk nodes present relative high degree centrality and low betweenness centrality compared with nodes in platform floor. The obtained high-risk nodes are helpful for the management firms to develop risk mitigation measures and re-allocate their resources to create a safe environment for passengers in the stations. The guarantee for the rail transit station operation safety plays an important role in enhancing urban sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Xu & Liudan Jiao & Shulin Chen & Milan Deng & Ningxin Shen, 2018. "An Innovative Approach to Determining High-Risk Nodes in a Complex Urban Rail Transit Station: A Perspective of Promoting Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2456-:d:157883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2456/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2456/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qin, Feifei & Zhang, Xiaoning & Zhou, Qiang, 2014. "Evaluating the impact of organizational patterns on the efficiency of urban rail transit systems in China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 89-99.
    2. Liudan Jiao & Liyin Shen & Chenyang Shuai & Yongtao Tan & Bei He, 2017. "Measuring Crowdedness between Adjacent Stations in an Urban Metro System: a Chinese Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Zhang, Jianhua & Wang, Shuliang & Wang, Xiaoyuan, 2018. "Comparison analysis on vulnerability of metro networks based on complex network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 496(C), pages 72-78.
    4. Liangliang Song & Qiming Li & George F. List & Yongliang Deng & Ping Lu, 2017. "Using an AHP-ISM Based Method to Study the Vulnerability Factors of Urban Rail Transit System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Todd Litman & David Burwell, 2006. "Issues in sustainable transportation," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(4), pages 331-347.
    6. Wu, Xingtang & Dong, Hairong & Tse, Chi Kong & Ho, Ivan W.H. & Lau, Francis C.M., 2018. "Analysis of metro network performance from a complex network perspective," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 492(C), pages 553-563.
    7. Van, Hong Tan & Choocharukul, Kasem & Fujii, Satoshi, 2014. "The effect of attitudes toward cars and public transportation on behavioral intention in commuting mode choice—A comparison across six Asian countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 36-44.
    8. Xing Chen & Leishan Zhou & Yixiang Yue & Yu Zhou & Liwen Liu, 2018. "Data-Driven Method to Estimate the Maximum Likelihood Space–Time Trajectory in an Urban Rail Transit System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Lee, Keumsook & Jung, Woo-Sung & Park, Jong Soo & Choi, M.Y., 2008. "Statistical analysis of the Metropolitan Seoul Subway System: Network structure and passenger flows," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(24), pages 6231-6234.
    10. Zhilong Chen & Lichang Su & Cheng Zhang, 2016. "Research on the Synergy Degree of Aboveground and Underground Space along Urban Rail Transit from the Perspective of Urban Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Daniel (Jian) Sun & Yuhan Zhao & Qing-Chang Lu, 2015. "Vulnerability Analysis of Urban Rail Transit Networks: A Case Study of Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Angeloudis, Panagiotis & Fisk, David, 2006. "Large subway systems as complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 367(C), pages 553-558.
    13. Gerald Beck & Cordula Kropp, 2011. "Infrastructures of risk: a mapping approach towards controversies on risks," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Michael Greenberg & Paul Lioy & Birnur Ozbas & Nancy Mantell & Sastry Isukapalli & Michael Lahr & Tayfur Altiok & Joseph Bober & Clifton Lacy & Karen Lowrie & Henry Mayer & Jennifer Rovito, 2013. "Passenger Rail Security, Planning, and Resilience: Application of Network, Plume, and Economic Simulation Models as Decision Support Tools," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(11), pages 1969-1986, November.
    15. Cox, Andrew & Prager, Fynnwin & Rose, Adam, 2011. "Transportation security and the role of resilience: A foundation for operational metrics," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 307-317, March.
    16. Latora, Vito & Marchiori, Massimo, 2002. "Is the Boston subway a small-world network?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 109-113.
    17. Hoong Chuin Lau & Zhi Yuan & Aldy Gunawan, 2016. "Patrol scheduling in urban rail network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 239(1), pages 317-342, April.
    18. Yang, Christopher & McCollum, David L & McCarthy, Ryan & Leighty, Wayne, 2009. "Meeting an 80% Reduction in Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Transportation by 2050: A Case Study in California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2ns1q98f, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    19. Liudan Jiao & Liyin Shen & Chenyang Shuai & Bei He, 2016. "A Novel Approach for Assessing the Performance of Sustainable Urbanization Based on Structural Equation Modeling: A China Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, September.
    20. Jing Liu & Huapu Lu & He Ma & Wenzhi Liu, 2017. "Network Vulnerability Analysis of Rail Transit Plans in Beijng-Tianjin-Hebei Region Considering Connectivity Reliability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Jinqu & Liu, Jie & Peng, Qiyuan & Yin, Yong, 2022. "Resilience assessment of an urban rail transit network: A case study of Chengdu subway," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 586(C).
    2. Hui Xu & Yang Li & Yongtao Tan & Ninghui Deng, 2021. "A Scientometric Review of Urban Disaster Resilience Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-27, April.
    3. Peng Mao & Jie Li & Lilin Xiong & Rubing Wang & Xiang Wang & Yongtao Tan & Hongyang Li, 2019. "Characterization of Urban Subway Microenvironment Exposure—A Case of Nanjing in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Jing Liu & Huapu Lu & Mingyu Chen & Jianyu Wang & Ying Zhang, 2020. "Macro Perspective Research on Transportation Safety: An Empirical Analysis of Network Characteristics and Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Xueguo Xu & Chen Xu & Wenxin Zhang, 2022. "Research on the Destruction Resistance of Giant Urban Rail Transit Network from the Perspective of Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    6. Jiangang Shi & Shiping Wen & Xianbo Zhao & Guangdong Wu, 2019. "Sustainable Development of Urban Rail Transit Networks: A Vulnerability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Du, Zhouyang & Tang, Jinjun & Qi, Yong & Wang, Yiwei & Han, Chunyang & Yang, Yifan, 2020. "Identifying critical nodes in metro network considering topological potential: A case study in Shenzhen city—China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 539(C).
    2. Zhang, Yanjie & Ayyub, Bilal M. & Saadat, Yalda & Zhang, Dongming & Huang, Hongwei, 2020. "A double-weighted vulnerability assessment model for metrorail transit networks and its application in Shanghai metro," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    3. Noguchi, Hiroki & Fuse, Masaaki, 2020. "Rethinking critical node problem for railway networks from the perspective of turn-back operation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 558(C).
    4. Yi Shen & Gang Ren & Bin Ran, 2021. "Cascading failure analysis and robustness optimization of metro networks based on coupled map lattices: a case study of Nanjing, China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 537-553, April.
    5. Kashin Sugishita & Yasuo Asakura, 2021. "Vulnerability studies in the fields of transportation and complex networks: a citation network analysis," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-34, March.
    6. Xueguo Xu & Chen Xu & Wenxin Zhang, 2022. "Research on the Destruction Resistance of Giant Urban Rail Transit Network from the Perspective of Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Hong, Liu & Ye, Bowen & Yan, Han & Zhang, Hui & Ouyang, Min & (Sean) He, Xiaozheng, 2019. "Spatiotemporal vulnerability analysis of railway systems with heterogeneous train flows," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 725-744.
    8. Yingying Xing & Jian Lu & Shendi Chen, 2016. "Weighted Complex Network Analysis of Shanghai Rail Transit System," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-8, August.
    9. Liu, Xiaolei & Lei, Zengxiang & Duan, Zhengyu, 2024. "Assessing metro network vulnerability with turn-back operations: A Monte Carlo method," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 646(C).
    10. Zhang, Jianhua & Wang, Shuliang & Wang, Xiaoyuan, 2018. "Comparison analysis on vulnerability of metro networks based on complex network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 496(C), pages 72-78.
    11. Lin Zhang & Jian Lu & Bai-bai Fu & Shu-bin Li, 2018. "A Review and Prospect for the Complexity and Resilience of Urban Public Transit Network Based on Complex Network Theory," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-36, December.
    12. Zhang, Jianhua & Wang, Shuliang & Zhang, Zhaojun & Zou, Kuansheng & Shu, Zhan, 2016. "Characteristics on hub networks of urban rail transit networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 447(C), pages 502-507.
    13. Zhang, Jianhua & Wang, Meng, 2019. "Transportation functionality vulnerability of urban rail transit networks based on movingblock: The case of Nanjing metro," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 535(C).
    14. Hu, Jie & Wen, Weiping & Zhai, Changhai & Pei, Shunshun, 2024. "Post-earthquake functionality assessment for urban subway systems: Incorporating the combined effects of seismic performance of structural and non-structural systems and functional interdependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    15. Zhang, Jianhua & Zhao, Mingwei & Liu, Haikuan & Xu, Xiaoming, 2013. "Networked characteristics of the urban rail transit networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(6), pages 1538-1546.
    16. Shuang Gu & Keping Li, 2019. "Reliability analysis of high-speed railway network," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(6), pages 1060-1073, December.
    17. Yangyang Meng & Qingjie Qi & Jianzhong Liu & Wei Zhou, 2022. "Dynamic Evolution Analysis of Complex Topology and Node Importance in Shenzhen Metro Network from 2004 to 2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Zhang, Jianhua & Song, Bo & Zhang, Zhaojun & Liu, Haikuan, 2014. "An approach for modeling vulnerability of the network of networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 412(C), pages 127-136.
    19. Rui Ding & Norsidah Ujang & Hussain Bin Hamid & Mohd Shahrudin Abd Manan & Rong Li & Safwan Subhi Mousa Albadareen & Ashkan Nochian & Jianjun Wu, 2019. "Application of Complex Networks Theory in Urban Traffic Network Researches," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1281-1317, December.
    20. Ting Chen & Jianxiao Ma & Zhenjun Zhu & Xiucheng Guo, 2023. "Evaluation Method for Node Importance of Urban Rail Network Considering Traffic Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2456-:d:157883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.