IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i7p2402-d157160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mitigating Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF 6 ) Emission from Electrical Equipment in China

Author

Listed:
  • Sheng Zhou

    (Institute of Energy, Environment, and Economy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Fei Teng

    (Institute of Energy, Environment, and Economy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Qing Tong

    (Institute of Energy, Environment, and Economy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

Sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6 ) is a powerful greenhouse gas with high global warming potential. Future growth in SF 6 use will be driven mainly by increasing demand for electricity and associated infrastructure in developing countries. In relation to electrical equipment, China currently produces the largest proportion of SF 6 emissions. Because of the long lifetimes of electrical equipment, SF 6 emissions are substantially different from its consumption, which has been used as an inaccurate proxy for emission estimations, i.e., the so-called “delayed emission effect.” This study established a model to estimate SF 6 emissions by considering the delay through equipment survival, retirement curve, and equipment life cycles. Three scenarios were established to model the potential for mitigation of SF 6 emissions from electrical equipment. The results showed considerable delayed effects in SF 6 emissions associated with electrical equipment. By 2050, the cumulative delayed emission was projected to be 50–249 kt under the different scenarios, which would be 1.2–6.0 GtCO 2 e. Therefore, replacing emissions with consumption could overestimate actual short-term emissions by 1–2 times. Although electrification in end-use sectors and high penetration of renewables in generation could lower global emissions substantially, SF 6 emissions by 2050 could still increase by 15 kt (i.e., 0.36 GtCO 2 e) if mitigation measures are not adopted. Thus, a low-carbon electricity roadmap should be complemented by careful management of electrical equipment. The potential for mitigation of SF 6 emissions could be realized through demand-side management to reduce electricity demand and through technological improvements on the supply side to reduce leakage and increase recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheng Zhou & Fei Teng & Qing Tong, 2018. "Mitigating Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF 6 ) Emission from Electrical Equipment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2402-:d:157160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2402/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2402/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhou, Sheng & Kyle, G. Page & Yu, Sha & Clarke, Leon E. & Eom, Jiyong & Luckow, Patrick & Chaturvedi, Vaibhav & Zhang, Xiliang & Edmonds, James A., 2013. "Energy use and CO2 emissions of China's industrial sector from a global perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 284-294.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pieter Billen & Ben Maes & Macarena Larrain & Johan Braet, 2020. "Replacing SF 6 in Electrical Gas-Insulated Switchgear: Technological Alternatives and Potential Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Savings in an EU-28 Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Minde An & Ronald G. Prinn & Luke M. Western & Xingchen Zhao & Bo Yao & Jianxin Hu & Anita L. Ganesan & Jens Mühle & Ray F. Weiss & Paul B. Krummel & Simon O’Doherty & Dickon Young & Matthew Rigby, 2024. "Sustained growth of sulfur hexafluoride emissions in China inferred from atmospheric observations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Maurizio Albano & A. Manu Haddad & Huw Griffiths & Paul Coventry, 2018. "Environmentally Friendly Compact Air-Insulated High-Voltage Substations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Ying Zhang & Mingwei Wang & Yalong Li & Lei Yu & Zhaodi Yang & Kun Wan, 2024. "A Study on the Efficient Degradation of Sulfur Hexafluoride by Pulsed Dielectric Barrier Discharge Synergistic Active Gas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-12, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kermeli, Katerina & Edelenbosch, Oreane Y. & Crijns-Graus, Wina & van Ruijven, Bas J. & van Vuuren, Detlef P. & Worrell, Ernst, 2022. "Improving material projections in Integrated Assessment Models: The use of a stock-based versus a flow-based approach for the iron and steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    2. Nayeah Kim & Yun Seop Hwang & Mun Ho Hwang, 2019. "New projection of GHG reduction potentials for Korea’s cement industry and comparison with Roadmap 2030," Energy & Environment, , vol. 30(3), pages 499-521, May.
    3. Shao, Tianming & Pan, Xunzhang & Li, Xiang & Zhou, Sheng & Zhang, Shu & Chen, Wenying, 2022. "China's industrial decarbonization in the context of carbon neutrality: A sub-sectoral analysis based on integrated modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    4. Liu, Junling & Yin, Mingjian & Xia-Hou, Qinrui & Wang, Ke & Zou, Ji, 2021. "Comparison of sectoral low-carbon transition pathways in China under the nationally determined contribution and 2 °C targets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    5. Jiang, Jingjing & Ye, Bin & Liu, Junguo, 2019. "Peak of CO2 emissions in various sectors and provinces of China: Recent progress and avenues for further research," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 813-833.
    6. Grzegorz Mentel & Waldemar Tarczyński & Marek Dylewski & Raufhon Salahodjaev, 2022. "Does Renewable Energy Sector Affect Industrialization-CO 2 Emissions Nexus in Europe and Central Asia?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-12, August.
    7. Zhao, Yue & Ke, Jing & Ni, Chun Chun & McNeil, Michael & Khanna, Nina Zheng & Zhou, Nan & Fridley, David & Li, Qiqiang, 2014. "A comparative study of energy consumption and efficiency of Japanese and Chinese manufacturing industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 45-56.
    8. Wang, Lining & Patel, Pralit L. & Yu, Sha & Liu, Bo & McLeod, Jeff & Clarke, Leon E. & Chen, Wenying, 2016. "Win–Win strategies to promote air pollutant control policies and non-fossil energy target regulation in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 244-253.
    9. Viebahn, Peter & Vallentin, Daniel & Höller, Samuel, 2015. "Prospects of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in China’s power sector – An integrated assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 229-244.
    10. Kaixin Huang & Matthew J. Eckelman, 2022. "Appending material flows to the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) for projecting the physical economy of the United States," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 294-308, February.
    11. Sheng Zhou & Alun Gu & Qing Tong & Yuefeng Guo & Xinyang Wei, 2022. "Multi‐scenario simulation on reducing CO2 emissions from China's major manufacturing industries targeting 2060," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 850-861, June.
    12. Jay Fuhrman & Andres F. Clarens & Haewon McJeon & Pralit Patel & Scott C. Doney & William M. Shobe & Shreekar Pradhan, 2020. "The role of negative emissions in meeting China's 2060 carbon neutrality goal," Papers 2010.06723, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    13. Oshiro, Ken & Fujimori, Shinichiro & Ochi, Yuki & Ehara, Tomoki, 2021. "Enabling energy system transition toward decarbonization in Japan through energy service demand reduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    14. Zhang, Aiping & Gao, Ji & Quan, Jinling & Zhou, Bo & Lam, Shu Kee & Zhou, Yuyu & Lin, Erda & Jiang, Kejun & Clarke, Leon E. & Zhang, Xuesong & Yu, Sha & Kyle, G.P. & Li, Hongbo & Zhou, Sheng & Gao, Sh, 2021. "The implications for energy crops under China's climate change challenges," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    15. Zhou, Sheng & Tong, Qing & Pan, Xunzhang & Cao, Min & Wang, Hailin & Gao, Ji & Ou, Xunmin, 2021. "Research on low-carbon energy transformation of China necessary to achieve the Paris agreement goals: A global perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    16. Zhang, Shaohui & Worrell, Ernst & Crijns-Graus, Wina & Wagner, Fabian & Cofala, Janusz, 2014. "Co-benefits of energy efficiency improvement and air pollution abatement in the Chinese iron and steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 333-345.
    17. van Ruijven, Bas J. & van Vuuren, Detlef P. & Boskaljon, Willem & Neelis, Maarten L. & Saygin, Deger & Patel, Martin K., 2016. "Long-term model-based projections of energy use and CO2 emissions from the global steel and cement industries," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 15-36.
    18. Jiang, Lu & Xue, Bing & Ma, Zhixiao & Yu, Lu & Huang, Beijia & Chen, Xingpeng, 2020. "A life-cycle based co-benefits analysis of biomass pellet production in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 445-452.
    19. Mohit Sharma & Vaibhav Chaturvedi & Pallav Purohit, 2017. "Long-term carbon dioxide and hydrofluorocarbon emissions from commercial space cooling and refrigeration in India: a detailed analysis within an integrated assessment modelling framework," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 503-517, August.
    20. Lee, Hwarang & Eom, Jiyong & Cho, Cheolhung & Koo, Yoonmo, 2019. "A bottom-up model of industrial energy system with positive mathematical programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 679-690.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2402-:d:157160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.