IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i6p1880-d150717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability Transitions and the Spatial Interface: Developing Conceptual Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Meike Levin-Keitel

    (Institute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30419 Hannover, Germany
    Research Center TRUST—Transdisciplinary Rural and Urban Transformation, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30419 Hannover, Germany)

  • Tanja Mölders

    (Research Center TRUST—Transdisciplinary Rural and Urban Transformation, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30419 Hannover, Germany
    Forum for GenderCompetence of Architecture|Landscape|Planning (gender_archland), Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30419 Hannover, Germany)

  • Frank Othengrafen

    (Institute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30419 Hannover, Germany
    Research Center TRUST—Transdisciplinary Rural and Urban Transformation, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30419 Hannover, Germany)

  • Jens Ibendorf

    (Research Center TRUST—Transdisciplinary Rural and Urban Transformation, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30419 Hannover, Germany)

Abstract

Sustainability transitions research lacks a crucial perspective: the spatial dimension. The interrelations between space and sustainability transition processes are thus underexposed. The spatial dimension is, of course, implicitly addressed in transition research but it often remains unclear which spatial concept is used and how the spatial conditions are embedded in the transition processes. This paper approaches the problem in two steps: (1) analysing the various understandings of transitions research and their implications for different spatial concepts relating to spatial sustainability transition; and (2) focusing on different spatial concepts (from a positivist mode to relational and socio-cultural approaches) and their reflections in different disciplines of social, natural and technical sciences as well as in practice. By identifying the links between sustainable transition approaches on the one hand and spatial conceptualizations on the other hand, this paper aims at deepening both the spatial perspective and the understanding of sustainable transition research. The results of this paper are three conceptual perspectives wherein space or spatial conceptualizations can provide added value for sustainability transition research in inter- and transdisciplinary modes. These three perspectives include (1) space as a “bridging concept,” (2) space as a “normative concept,” and (3) space as an “approach to action.”

Suggested Citation

  • Meike Levin-Keitel & Tanja Mölders & Frank Othengrafen & Jens Ibendorf, 2018. "Sustainability Transitions and the Spatial Interface: Developing Conceptual Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:1880-:d:150717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1880/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1880/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coenen, Lars & Raven, Rob & Verbong, Geert, 2010. "Local niche experimentation in energy transitions: A theoretical and empirical exploration of proximity advantages and disadvantages," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 295-302.
    2. Franziska Ehnert & Niki Frantzeskaki & Jake Barnes & Sara Borgström & Leen Gorissen & Florian Kern & Logan Strenchock & Markus Egermann, 2018. "The Acceleration of Urban Sustainability Transitions: A Comparison of Brighton, Budapest, Dresden, Genk, and Stockholm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, February.
    3. Michael Sonis, 2005. "Central Place Theory after Christaller and Further Explorations - in Memory of August Loesch , 15 October 1906- 30 May 1945," ERSA conference papers ersa05p18, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Smith, Adrian & Voß, Jan-Peter & Grin, John, 2010. "Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 435-448, May.
    5. Markard, Jochen & Raven, Rob & Truffer, Bernhard, 2012. "Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 955-967.
    6. Simin Davoudi, 2012. "The Legacy of Positivism and the Emergence of Interpretive Tradition in Spatial Planning," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 429-441, July.
    7. Lars Coenen & Bernhard Truffer, 2012. "Places and Spaces of Sustainability Transitions: Geographical Contributions to an Emerging Research and Policy Field," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 367-374, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Held, Martin, 2022. "Spatial transformation: An introduction to the Great Transformation towards sustainability," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Spatial transformation: Processes, strategies, research design, volume 19, pages 27-49, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    2. Ryan D. Bergstrom & Lisa M.B. Harrington, 2019. "Embedded in Nature: Challenges to Sustainability in Communities of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Larjosto, Vilja, 2019. "Research through Design as a transformative approach," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Abassiharofteh, Milad & Baier, Jessica & Göb, Angelina & Thimm, Insa & Eberth, Andreas & Knaps, Falc (ed.), Räumliche Transformation: Prozesse, Konzepte, Forschungsdesigns, volume 10, pages 217-225, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    4. Schaefer, Kerstin J. & Tuitjer, Leonie & Levin-Keitel, Meike, 2021. "Transport disrupted – Substituting public transport by bike or car under Covid 19," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 202-217.
    5. Larjosto, Vilja, 2022. "Research through Design as a transformative approach," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Spatial transformation: Processes, strategies, research design, volume 19, pages 201-208, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    6. Knaps, Falco & Herrmann, Sylvia & Mölders, Tanja, 2022. "Landscape identity: Approaches to its conceptualisation, capture and integration into place branding processes," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Spatial transformation: Processes, strategies, research design, volume 19, pages 164-178, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    7. Held, Martin, 2019. "Räumliche Transformation: Eine Einführung in die Große Transformation zur Nachhaltigkeit," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Abassiharofteh, Milad & Baier, Jessica & Göb, Angelina & Thimm, Insa & Eberth, Andreas & Knaps, Falc (ed.), Räumliche Transformation: Prozesse, Konzepte, Forschungsdesigns, volume 10, pages 29-52, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    8. Giles Thomson & Henrik Ny & Varvara Nikulina & Sven Borén & James Ayers & Jayne Bryant, 2020. "‘Rapid Scenario Planning’ to Support a Regional Sustainability Transformation Vision: A Case Study from Blekinge, Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-26, August.
    9. Engbers, Moritz, 2019. "Räumliche Transformationsprozesse durch transdisziplinäre Fallstudien verstehen und gestalten," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Abassiharofteh, Milad & Baier, Jessica & Göb, Angelina & Thimm, Insa & Eberth, Andreas & Knaps, Falc (ed.), Räumliche Transformation: Prozesse, Konzepte, Forschungsdesigns, volume 10, pages 206-216, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    10. Vojkan Jovičić & Boštjan Volk & Janko Logar, 2018. "Conditions for the Sustainable Development of Underground Transport in the Ljubljana Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, August.
    11. Engbers, Moritz, 2022. "Understanding and shaping spatial transformation processes through transdisciplinary case studies," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Spatial transformation: Processes, strategies, research design, volume 19, pages 191-200, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    12. Frank Othengrafen & Meike Levin-Keitel, 2019. "Planners between the Chairs: How Planners (Do Not) Adapt to Transformative Practices," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 111-138.
    13. Sibylle Bui, 2021. "Enacting Transitions—The Combined Effect of Multiple Niches in Whole System Reconfiguration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Knaps, Falco & Herrmann, Sylvia & Mölders, Tanja, 2019. "Landschaftsbezogene Identität: Ansätze zur Konzeptualisierung, Erfassung und Integration in Place Branding-Prozesse," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Abassiharofteh, Milad & Baier, Jessica & Göb, Angelina & Thimm, Insa & Eberth, Andreas & Knaps, Falc (ed.), Räumliche Transformation: Prozesse, Konzepte, Forschungsdesigns, volume 10, pages 177-192, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    15. Carlos Bueno-Suárez & Daniel Coq-Huelva, 2020. "Sustaining What Is Unsustainable: A Review of Urban Sprawl and Urban Socio-Environmental Policies in North America and Western Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-36, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mura, Matteo & Longo, Mariolina & Toschi, Laura & Zanni, Sara & Visani, Franco & Bianconcini, Silvia, 2021. "The role of geographical scales in sustainability transitions: An empirical investigation of the European industrial context," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    2. Hansen , Teis & Coenen , Lars, 2013. "The Geography of Sustainability Transitions: A Literature Review," Papers in Innovation Studies 2013/39, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    3. Jonas Torrens & Phillip Johnstone & Johan Schot, 2018. "Unpacking the Formation of Favourable Environments for Urban Experimentation: The Case of the Bristol Energy Scene," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-28, March.
    4. Sebastian Fastenrath & Boris Braun, 2018. "Lost in Transition? Directions for an Economic Geography of Urban Sustainability Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Hansmeier Hendrik & Kroll Henning, 2024. "The geography of eco-innovations and sustainability transitions: A systematic comparison," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 68(2), pages 125-143.
    6. Kejia Yang & Johan Schot & Bernhard Truffer, 2020. "Shaping the Directionality of Sustainability Transitions: The Diverging Development Patterns of Solar PV in Two Chinese Provinces," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-14, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    7. Farrelly, M.A. & Tawfik, S., 2020. "Engaging in disruption: A review of emerging microgrids in Victoria, Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    8. Sandro Montresor & Francesco Quatraro, 2020. "Green technologies and Smart Specialisation Strategies: a European patent-based analysis of the intertwining of technological relatedness and key enabling technologies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(10), pages 1354-1365, October.
    9. Coenen, Lars & Benneworth, Paul & Truffer, Bernhard, 2012. "Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 968-979.
    10. Zhen Yu & David Gibbs, 2020. "Unravelling the role of green entrepreneurs in urban sustainability transitions: A case study of China’s Solar City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(14), pages 2901-2917, November.
    11. Berkeley, Nigel & Bailey, David & Jones, Andrew & Jarvis, David, 2017. "Assessing the transition towards Battery Electric Vehicles: A Multi-Level Perspective on drivers of, and barriers to, take up," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 320-332.
    12. Christina Gugerell & Marianne Penker, 2020. "Change Agents’ Perspectives on Spatial–Relational Proximities and Urban Food Niches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Veldhuizen, Caroline, 2021. "Conceptualising the foundations of sustainability focused innovation policy: From constructivism to holism," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    14. Julia Affolderbach & Christian Schulz, 2016. "Mobile transitions: Exploring synergies for urban sustainability research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(9), pages 1942-1957, July.
    15. Daniel Coq-Huelva & Rosario Asián-Chaves, 2019. "Urban Sprawl and Sustainable Urban Policies. A Review of the Cases of Lima, Mexico City and Santiago de Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Huguenin, Ariane & Jeannerat, Hugues, 2017. "Creating change through pilot and demonstration projects: Towards a valuation policy approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 624-635.
    17. Anke Kutschke & Alexandra Rese & Daniel Baier, 2016. "The Effects of Locational Factors on the Performance of Innovation Networks in the German Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Chlebna, Camilla & Mattes, Jannika, 2019. "When the novelty fades – Socio-technical, spatial and temporal dimensions of regional energy transitions," Papers in Innovation Studies 2019/6, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    19. Rob Raven & Johan Schot & Frans Berkhout, 2012. "Breaking out of the national: Foundations for a multi-scalar perspective of socio-technical transitions," Working Papers 12-03, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies, revised Aug 2012.
    20. Stefano Basilico & Nils Grashof, 2023. "The transition of brown regions: A matter of timing?," Jena Economics Research Papers 2023-003, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:1880-:d:150717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.