IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i5p1403-d144226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Biochar on the Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions under Continuous Flooding and Water-Saving Irrigation Conditions in Paddy Soils

Author

Listed:
  • Le Qi

    (College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China)

  • Hai-Dong Niu

    (College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China)

  • Peng Zhou

    (College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China)

  • Rui-Jie Jia

    (College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China)

  • Ming Gao

    (College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China)

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the greenhouse gas emission under different application of biochar in the conditions of continuous flooding and water-saving irrigation in paddy fields, whereas, plant and soil carbon sequestration were considered in the calculation of net greenhouse gas emissions. The emission rates of methane (CH 4 ), carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) gases were simultaneously monitored once every 7–10 days using the closed-chamber method. As a whole, the net greenhouse gas emission in the water-saving irrigation was more than that of the continuous flooding irrigation conditions. Compared with the water-saving irrigation, the continuous flooding irrigation significantly increased the CH 4 in the control (CK) and chemical fertilizer treatments (NPK). The CO 2 emissions increased in each treatment of the water-saving irrigation condition, especially in the chemical fertilizer treatments (NPK FW ). Similarly, the soil N 2 O emission was very sensitive to the water-saving irrigation condition. An interesting finding is that the biochar application in soils cut down the soil N 2 O emission more significantly than NPK FW in the water-saving irrigation condition while the effect of biochar increased under the continuous flooding irrigation condition.

Suggested Citation

  • Le Qi & Hai-Dong Niu & Peng Zhou & Rui-Jie Jia & Ming Gao, 2018. "Effects of Biochar on the Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions under Continuous Flooding and Water-Saving Irrigation Conditions in Paddy Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1403-:d:144226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1403/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1403/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johannes Lehmann, 2007. "A handful of carbon," Nature, Nature, vol. 447(7141), pages 143-144, May.
    2. Karakurt, Izzet & Aydin, Gokhan & Aydiner, Kerim, 2012. "Sources and mitigation of methane emissions by sectors: A critical review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 40-48.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haihong Song & Jianming Wang & Ankit Garg & Xuankai Lin & Qian Zheng & Susmita Sharma, 2019. "Potential of Novel Biochars Produced from Invasive Aquatic Species Outside Food Chain in Removing Ammonium Nitrogen: Comparison with Conventional Biochars and Clinoptilolite," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Ariani, Miranti & Hanudin, Eko & Haryono, Eko, 2022. "The effect of contrasting soil textures on the efficiency of alternate wetting-drying to reduce water use and global warming potential," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    3. Han, Yu & Zhang, Zhongxue & Li, Tiecheng & Chen, Peng & Nie, Tangzhe & Zhang, Zuohe & Du, Sicheng, 2023. "Straw return alleviates the greenhouse effect of paddy fields by increasing soil organic carbon sequestration under water-saving irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    4. Yang Liu & Xiaoyu Liu & Ni Ren & Yanfang Feng & Lihong Xue & Linzhang Yang, 2019. "Effect of Pyrochar and Hydrochar on Water Evaporation in Clayey Soil under Greenhouse Cultivation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Shufang Wang & Hongchun Bi & Liping Wang & Jing Wang & Ying Wang & Lihong Chen, 2024. "Effects of controlled irrigation on global warming potential based on CH4, N2O and CO2 fluxes in plateau paddy field," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(9), pages 535-542.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lychuk, Taras E. & Hill, Robert L. & Izaurralde, Roberto C. & Momen, Bahram & Thomson, Allison M., 2021. "Evaluation of climate change impacts and effectiveness of adaptation options on nitrate loss, microbial respiration, and soil organic carbon in the Southeastern USA," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Kanbur, Ravi & Bento, Antonio M. & Leard, Benjamin, 2012. "SUPER-ADDITIONALITY: A Neglected Force in Markets for Carbon Offsets," Working Papers 128811, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    3. Huang, Yawen & Tao, Bo & Lal, Rattan & Lorenz, Klaus & Jacinthe, Pierre-Andre & Shrestha, Raj K. & Bai, Xiongxiong & Singh, Maninder P. & Lindsey, Laura E. & Ren, Wei, 2023. "A global synthesis of biochar's sustainability in climate-smart agriculture - Evidence from field and laboratory experiments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    4. Thakkar, Jignesh & Kumar, Amit & Ghatora, Sonia & Canter, Christina, 2016. "Energy balance and greenhouse gas emissions from the production and sequestration of charcoal from agricultural residues," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 558-567.
    5. Zhang, Zhikun & Zhu, Zongyuan & Shen, Boxiong & Liu, Lina, 2019. "Insights into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 581-598.
    6. Qin, Fanzhi & Zhang, Chen & Zeng, Guangming & Huang, Danlian & Tan, Xiaofei & Duan, Abing, 2022. "Lignocellulosic biomass carbonization for biochar production and characterization of biochar reactivity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    7. Kung, Chih-Chun & McCarl, Bruce A. & Cao, Xiaoyong, 2013. "Economics of pyrolysis-based energy production and biochar utilization: A case study in Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 317-323.
    8. Jayanta Layek & Rumi Narzari & Samarendra Hazarika & Anup Das & Krishnappa Rangappa & Shidayaichenbi Devi & Arumugam Balusamy & Saurav Saha & Sandip Mandal & Ramkrushna Gandhiji Idapuganti & Subhash B, 2022. "Prospects of Biochar for Sustainable Agriculture and Carbon Sequestration: An Overview for Eastern Himalayas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Ahmad Numery Ashfaqul Haque & Md. Kamal Uddin & Muhammad Firdaus Sulaiman & Adibah Mohd Amin & Mahmud Hossain & Syaharudin Zaibon & Mehnaz Mosharrof, 2021. "Assessing the Increase in Soil Moisture Storage Capacity and Nutrient Enhancement of Different Organic Amendments in Paddy Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Kang, Mary & Mauzerall, Denise L. & Ma, Daniel Z. & Celia, Michael A., 2019. "Reducing methane emissions from abandoned oil and gas wells: Strategies and costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 594-601.
    11. Faubert, Patrick & Barnabé, Simon & Bouchard, Sylvie & Côté, Richard & Villeneuve, Claude, 2016. "Pulp and paper mill sludge management practices: What are the challenges to assess the impacts on greenhouse gas emissions?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 107-133.
    12. Ahmad Numery Ashfaqul Haque & Md. Kamal Uddin & Muhammad Firdaus Sulaiman & Adibah Mohd Amin & Mahmud Hossain & Zakaria M. Solaiman & Azharuddin Abd Aziz & Mehnaz Mosharrof, 2022. "Combined Use of Biochar with 15 Nitrogen Labelled Urea Increases Rice Yield, N Use Efficiency and Fertilizer N Recovery under Water-Saving Irrigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    13. Wang, Bin & Liu, Shuyang & Wang, Pengfei, 2022. "Microwave-assisted high-efficient gas production of depressurization-induced methane hydrate exploitation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    14. Georgios Varvoutis & Athanasios Lampropoulos & Evridiki Mandela & Michalis Konsolakis & George E. Marnellos, 2022. "Recent Advances on CO 2 Mitigation Technologies: On the Role of Hydrogenation Route via Green H 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-38, June.
    15. Zouhair Elkhlifi & Jerosha Iftikhar & Mohammad Sarraf & Baber Ali & Muhammad Hamzah Saleem & Irshad Ibranshahib & Mozart Daltro Bispo & Lucas Meili & Sezai Ercisli & Ehlinaz Torun Kayabasi & Naser Ale, 2023. "Potential Role of Biochar on Capturing Soil Nutrients, Carbon Sequestration and Managing Environmental Challenges: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Karolina Barčauskaitė & Olga Anne & Ieva Mockevičienė & Regina Repšienė & Gintaras Šiaudinis & Danutė Karčauskienė, 2023. "Determination of Heavy Metals Immobilization by Chemical Fractions in Contaminated Soil Amended with Biochar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Mathews, John A., 2008. "Carbon-negative biofuels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 940-945, March.
    18. Savvas L. Douvartzides & Nikolaos D. Charisiou & Kyriakos N. Papageridis & Maria A. Goula, 2019. "Green Diesel: Biomass Feedstocks, Production Technologies, Catalytic Research, Fuel Properties and Performance in Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-41, February.
    19. Sriphirom, Patikorn & Rossopa, Benjamas, 2023. "Assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation from rice cultivation using alternate wetting and drying and rice straw biochar in Thailand," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    20. Feng, Qunjie & Lin, Yunqin, 2017. "Integrated processes of anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis for higher bioenergy recovery from lignocellulosic biomass: A brief review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1272-1287.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1403-:d:144226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.