IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i3p769-d135767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unravelling the Fuzzy Effect of Economic, Social and Environmental Sustainability on the Corporate Reputation of Public-Sector Organizations: A Case Study of Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Irfan

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Balochistan University of Information Technology Engineering and Management Sciences, Quetta 87650, Pakistan)

  • Mazlan Hassan

    (Department of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Nasruddin Hassan

    (School of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present and to validate a research model that includes economic sustainability, social sustainability, environmental sustainability and corporate reputation in the context of public-sector organizations in Pakistan. The methodological approach is survey-based, using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to assess the research model. The proposed hypotheses were tested based on a sample of 425 respondents from public-sector organizations in Pakistan. The findings of the study indicate that there is a positive relationship between economic sustainability, social sustainability, environmental sustainability and corporate reputation. Therefore, it is inferred from the results that different aspects of sustainability can create and enhance the reputation of public-sector organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Irfan & Mazlan Hassan & Nasruddin Hassan, 2018. "Unravelling the Fuzzy Effect of Economic, Social and Environmental Sustainability on the Corporate Reputation of Public-Sector Organizations: A Case Study of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:769-:d:135767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/769/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/769/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dijkmans, Corné & Kerkhof, Peter & Beukeboom, Camiel J., 2015. "A stage to engage: Social media use and corporate reputation," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 58-67.
    2. Weng, Pei-Shih & Chen, Wan-Yi, 2017. "Doing good or choosing well? Corporate reputation, CEO reputation, and corporate financial performance," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 223-240.
    3. Pellegrini-Masini, Giuseppe & Leishman, Chris, 2011. "The role of corporate reputation and employees' values in the uptake of energy efficiency in office buildings," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5409-5419, September.
    4. Gatzert, Nadine, 2015. "The impact of corporate reputation and reputation damaging events on financial performance: Empirical evidence from the literature," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 485-499.
    5. Cravens, Karen S. & Oliver, Elizabeth Goad, 2006. "Employees: The key link to corporate reputation management," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 293-302.
    6. Edwin Chan & Grace Lee, 2008. "Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 243-256, January.
    7. Bartikowski, Boris & Walsh, Gianfranco & Beatty, Sharon E., 2011. "Culture and age as moderators in the corporate reputation and loyalty relationship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(9), pages 966-972, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Debesh Mishra & Suchismita Satapathy, 2022. "Sustainability-assessment for farm-machinery," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(5), pages 2165-2174, October.
    2. Muhammad Irfan & Sanam Zaib Khan & Nasruddin Hassan & Mazlan Hassan & Muhammad Habib & Salma Khan & Hadi Hassan Khan, 2021. "Role of Project Planning and Project Manager Competencies on Public Sector Project Success," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    3. María Dolores Sánchez-Fernández & Daniel Álvarez-Bassi & José Ramón-Cardona, 2020. "Management of Tourist Destinations: The Expectations of Guests on eWOM Generation in Maldonado (Uruguay)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Manuel A. Fernández-Gámez & José António C. Santos & Julio Diéguez-Soto & Juan A. Campos-Soria, 2020. "The Effect of Countries’ Health and Environmental Conditions on Restaurant Reputation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Rishi Raj Sharma & Tanveer Kaur, 2024. "Determinants of the Effects of Sustainability Marketing on consumers’ Purchase Intentions: An Empirical Investigation," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 13(2), pages 228-241, July.
    6. Luis Manuel Cerdá Suárez & Jesús Perán López & Belén Cambronero Saiz, 2020. "The Influence of Heuristic judgments in Social Media on Corporate Reputation: A Study in Spanish Leader Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salman Khan, 2019. "Chief Reputation Officer (CRO): Envisioning the Role," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 75-88, August.
    2. Anna Blajer-Gołębiewska, 2021. "Individual corporate reputation and perception of collective corporate reputation regarding stock market investments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Confente, Ilenia & Siciliano, Giorgia Giusi & Gaudenzi, Barbara & Eickhoff, Matthias, 2019. "Effects of data breaches from user-generated content: A corporate reputation analysis," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 492-504.
    4. Mercedes Rubio-Andrés & Mª Ramos-González & Miguel Ángel Sastre-Castillo, 2022. "Driving innovation management to create shared value and sustainable growth," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(7), pages 2181-2211, October.
    5. Simona Galletta & Sebastiano Mazzù & Valeria Naciti & Carlo Vermiglio, 2021. "Sustainable development and financial institutions: Do banks' environmental policies influence customer deposits?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 643-656, January.
    6. Francesco Gangi & Antonio Meles & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are environmentally friendly banks less risky?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 529-547, May.
    7. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Valentinas Podvezko & Ieva Ubarte & Arturas Kaklauskas, 2017. "MCDM Assessment of a Healthy and Safe Built Environment According to Sustainable Development Principles: A Practical Neighborhood Approach in Vilnius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-30, April.
    8. Francesca Bernini & Fabio La Rosa, 2024. "Research in the greenwashing field: concepts, theories, and potential impacts on economic and social value," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 405-444, June.
    9. Jubril Olakitan Atanda & Ayşe Öztürk, 2020. "Social criteria of sustainable development in relation to green building assessment tools," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 61-87, January.
    10. Wong, Jin Boon & Zhang, Qin, 2022. "Stock market reactions to adverse ESG disclosure via media channels," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    11. Yao, Shouyu & Pan, Yuying & Sensoy, Ahmet & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Cheng, Feiyang, 2021. "Green credit policy and firm performance: What we learn from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    12. Zhang, Chu-Bing & Zhang, Zhuo-Ping & Chang, Ying & Li, Tian-Ge & Hou, Ru-Jing, 2022. "Effect of WeChat interaction on brand evaluation: A moderated mediation model of para-social interaction and affiliative tendency," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    13. Rafia Afrin & Ni Peng & Frances Bowen, 2022. "The Wealth Effect of Corporate Water Actions: How Past Corporate Responsibility and Irresponsibility Influence Stock Market Reactions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 105-124, September.
    14. Zheng, Wei & Shen, Geoffrey Qiping & Wang, Hao & Hong, Jingke & Li, Zhengdao, 2017. "Decision support for sustainable urban renewal: A multi-scale model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 361-371.
    15. María Dolores Aledo‐Ruiz & Eva Martínez‐Caro & José Manuel Santos‐Jaén, 2022. "The influence of corporate social responsibility on students' emotional appeal in the HEIs: The mediating effect of reputation and corporate image," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 578-592, May.
    16. Christian Eckert, 2020. "Risk and risk management of spillover effects: Evidence from the literature," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 23(1), pages 75-104, March.
    17. Anna Gorska & Grzegorz Mazurek, 2021. "The effect of the CEO media coverage on corporate brand equity: evidence from Poland," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(2), pages 499-523, June.
    18. Liu, Fangyi, 2021. "Family business succession roadblock model based on fuzzy linguistic preference relations," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    19. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    20. Tutun Mukherjee & Som Sankar Sen, 2022. "Impact of CEO attributes on corporate reputation, financial performance, and corporate sustainable growth: evidence from India," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-50, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:769-:d:135767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.