IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i3p613-d133757.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discourses across Scales on Forest Landscape Restoration

Author

Listed:
  • Sabine Reinecke

    (Chair Group of Forest and Environmental Policy, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany)

  • Mareike Blum

    (Chair Group of Forest and Environmental Policy, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany)

Abstract

Forest Landscape Restoration (FLR) has recently received broad political support, e.g., under the Bonn Challenge. However, although the concept promises quadruple wins for humans, biodiversity as well as climate change mitigation and adaptation, it remains heavily underutilized in practice. Drawing on a social constructivist reading and a survey in different developing and developed countries, we elaborate on varying existing narratives about FLR at global and country level. Overall, we find that FLR understandings in different countries strongly resonate with the globally pursued idea of enhancing ecological and human well-being. In more detail, however, rural development and climate mitigation oriented motives are prioritized over aspects of species conservation or adaptation. Globally, strong emphasis is placed on collaborative processes empowering local actors. At country level, by contrast, these ideas regarding greater local authority are complemented with a techno-managerial notion of government control. Considering the potential power struggles that could be evoked from such dialectic expectations, we see it as a primary responsibility for global FLR processes to fully embrace the political dimension of FLR and to support conflict resolution and adaptive learning processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabine Reinecke & Mareike Blum, 2018. "Discourses across Scales on Forest Landscape Restoration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:613-:d:133757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/613/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/613/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nielsen, Tobias Dan, 2016. "From REDD+ forests to green landscapes? Analyzing the emerging integrated landscape approach discourse in the UNFCCC," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 177-184.
    2. Emily Boyd, 2009. "Governing the Clean Development Mechanism: Global Rhetoric versus Local Realities in Carbon Sequestration Projects," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(10), pages 2380-2395, October.
    3. Joyotee Smith, 2002. "Afforestation and reforestation in the clean development mechanism of the Kyoto Protocol: implications for forests and forest people," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3/4), pages 322-343.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sapkota, Lok Mani & Jihadah, Lina & Sato, Mayumi & Greijmans, Martin & Wiset, Kanchana & Aektasaeng, Ngamnet & Daisai, Atcharaporn & Gritten, David, 2021. "Translating global commitments into action for successful forest landscape restoration: Lessons from Ing watershed in northern Thailand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Metodi Sotirov & Benno Pokorny & Daniela Kleinschmit & Peter Kanowski, 2020. "International Forest Governance and Policy: Institutional Architecture and Pathways of Influence in Global Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-25, August.
    3. Mansourian, Stephanie & Sgard, Anne, 2021. "Diverse interpretations of governance and their relevance to forest landscape restoration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    4. Jack Baynes & Geoff P. Lovell & John Herbohn, 2021. "Psychological outcomes of REDD + projects: evidence from country case studies," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1-27, April.
    5. Ricardo Gomes César & Loren Belei & Carolina Giudice Badari & Ricardo A. G. Viani & Victoria Gutierrez & Robin L. Chazdon & Pedro H. S. Brancalion & Carla Morsello, 2020. "Forest and Landscape Restoration: A Review Emphasizing Principles, Concepts, and Practices," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Jonathan W. Long & E. Ashley Steel, 2020. "Shifting Perspectives in Assessing Socio-Environmental Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Tschakert, Petra & Parsons, Meg & Atkins, Ed & Garcia, Alicea & Godden, Naomi & Gonda, Noemi & Henrique, Karen Paiva & Sallu, Susannah & Steen, Karin & Ziervogel, Gina, 2023. "Methodological lessons for negotiating power, political capabilities, and resilience in research on climate change responses," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    8. Laudari, Hari Krishna & Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Pariyar, Shiva & Pant, Basant & Bhattarai, Sushma & Kaini, Tika Raj & Karki, Gyanendra & Marahattha, Anisha, 2022. "Sixty-five years of forest restoration in Nepal: Lessons learned and way forward," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Smith, Joyotee & Scherr, Sara J., 2003. "Capturing the Value of Forest Carbon for Local Livelihoods," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 2143-2160, December.
    2. Hunsberger, Carol & Work, Courtney & Herre, Roman, 2018. "Linking climate change strategies and land conflicts in Cambodia: Evidence from the Greater Aural region," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 309-320.
    3. Regan, Courtney M. & Connor, Jeffery D. & Summers, David M. & Settre, Claire & O’Connor, Patrick J. & Cavagnaro, Timothy R., 2020. "The influence of crediting and permanence periods on Australian forest-based carbon offset supply," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Morgan, Edward A. & Buckwell, Andrew & Guidi, Caterina & Garcia, Beatriz & Rimmer, Lawrence & Cadman, Tim & Mackey, Brendan, 2022. "Capturing multiple forest ecosystem services for just benefit sharing: The Basket of Benefits Approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    5. Ameni Hasnaoui & Max Krott, 2019. "Optimizing State Forest Institutions for Forest People: A Case Study on Social Sustainability from Tunisia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-29, April.
    6. Kylie Clay & Lauren Cooper, 2022. "Safeguarding against Harm in a Climate-Smart Forest Economy: Definitions, Challenges, and Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, April.
    7. Farrell, Katharine N., 2014. "Intellectual mercantilism and franchise equity: A critical study of the ecological political economy of international payments for ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 137-146.
    8. Soliev, Ilkhom & Theesfeld, Insa & Abert, Eileen & Schramm, Wiebke, 2021. "Benefit sharing and conflict transformation: Insights for and from REDD+ forest governance in sub-Saharan Africa," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    9. Blanchard, Libby & Vira, Bhaskar & Briefer, Laura, 2015. "The lost narrative: Ecosystem service narratives and the missing Wasatch watershed conservation story," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 105-111.
    10. Edward A. Morgan & Glenn Bush & Joseph Zambo Mandea & Melaine Kermarc & Brendan Mackey, 2022. "Comparing Community Needs and REDD+ Activities for Capacity Building and Forest Protection in the Équateur Province of the Democratic Republic of Congo," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Morgan, Edward A. & Osborne, Natalie & Mackey, Brendan, 2022. "Evaluating planning without plans: Principles, criteria and indicators for effective forest landscape approaches," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    12. DePuy, Walker, 2023. "Seeing like a smartphone: The co-production of landscape-scale and rights-based conservation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    13. Ashish Aggarwal, 2014. "How sustainable are forestry clean development mechanism projects?—A review of the selected projects from India," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 73-91, January.
    14. Oscar J. Cacho & Graham R. Marshall & Mary Milne, 2003. "Smallholder Agroforestry Projects: Potential for carbon sequestration and poverty alleviation," Working Papers 03-06, Agricultural and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO - ESA).
    15. Pauliina Upla & James Reed & Kaala B. Moombe & Benjamin J. Kazule & Brian P. Mulenga & Mirjam Ros-Tonen & Terry Sunderland, 2022. "Assessing the Potential for Private Sector Engagement in Integrated Landscape Approaches: Insights from Value-Chain Analyses in Southern Zambia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, September.
    16. Wurtzebach, Zachary & Casse, Thorkil & Meilby, Henrik & Nielsen, Martin R. & Milhøj, Anders, 2019. "REDD+ policy design and policy learning: The emergence of an integrated landscape approach in Vietnam," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 129-139.
    17. Cadman, Tim & Sarker, Tapan & Muttaqin, Zahrul & Nurfatriani, Fitri & Salminah, Mimi & Maraseni, Tek, 2019. "The role of fiscal instruments in encouraging the private sector and smallholders to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: Evidence from Indonesia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Larson, Donald F. & Dinar, Ariel & Blankespoor, Brian, 2012. "Aligning climate change mitigation and agricultural policies in Eastern Europe and Central Asia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6080, The World Bank.
    19. Guo, Jinggang & Gong, Peichen, 2017. "The potential and cost of increasing forest carbon sequestration in Sweden," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 78-86.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:613-:d:133757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.