IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v164y2023ics0305750x22003710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seeing like a smartphone: The co-production of landscape-scale and rights-based conservation

Author

Listed:
  • DePuy, Walker

Abstract

Landscape approaches are heralded as ways to advance more effective and equitable social-ecological governance by working across economic sectors and stakeholder groups. There remains a need, however, to understand how they are enacted in particular contexts, how rights-based efforts are pursued within them, and what this means for the protection of community rights. Developed in partnership by The Nature Conservancy and the Berau district government, the Berau Forest Carbon Program (BFCP) uses a landscape approach to advance REDD+ policy in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Drawing on 26 months of ethnographic research across international, national, subnational, and village governance levels, I find the BFCP aligns with Indonesia’s national vision of green growth. Focusing on the BFCP’s rights-based instrument known as SIGAP, I find that it enacts and facilitates that green growth vision both through forest governance policy and as a malleable Foucauldian “technology of power.” Tracing how SIGAP has expanded over time from a community engagement protocol to become a multi-stakeholder platform and social media app, this work empirically documents how landscape-scale and rights-based conservation agendas recursively influence each other and that this dynamic co-production illuminates important tensions between rights-based agendas and projects of environmental governance. One example of such a tension is how the development and use of the SIGAP app is shown to preclude the recognition and discussion of stakeholder conflict and in so doing undermine community rights. Ultimately, this article presents a valuable case study for thinking through the diverse kinds of work rights-based instruments can do and centers the need for conservationists to recognize rights-based approaches not as technical toolkits but rather governance mechanisms to be considered and navigated appropriately.

Suggested Citation

  • DePuy, Walker, 2023. "Seeing like a smartphone: The co-production of landscape-scale and rights-based conservation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:164:y:2023:i:c:s0305750x22003710
    DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X22003710
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106181?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine Corson & Lisa M. Campbell & Kenneth Iain MacDonald, 2014. "Capturing the Personal in Politics: Ethnographies of Global Environmental Governance," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 14(3), pages 21-40, August.
    2. Kazuhiro Harada & Dede Prabowo & Arif Aliadi & Jun Ichihara & Hwan-Ok Ma, 2015. "How Can Social Safeguards of REDD+ Function Effectively Conserve Forests and Improve Local Livelihoods? A Case from Meru Betiri National Park, East Java, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Reed, James & Ickowitz, Amy & Chervier, Colas & Djoudi, Houria & Moombe, Kaala & Ros-Tonen, Mirjam & Yanou, Malaika & Yuliani, Linda & Sunderland, Terry, 2020. "Integrated landscape approaches in the tropics: A brief stock-take," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja & Tacconi, Luca & Sloan, Sean & Hamdani, Faridh Almuhayat Uhib & Subarudi, & Alviya, Iis & Muttaqin, Muhammad Zahrul, 2019. "Indonesia's land reform: Implications for local livelihoods and climate change," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja & Atmadja, Stibniati & Ekaputri, Andini Desita & Intarini, Dian Y. & Indriatmoko, Yayan & Astri, Pangestuti, 2014. "Does Tenure Security Lead to REDD+ Project Effectiveness? Reflections from Five Emerging Sites in Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 68-83.
    6. Rini Astuti & Andrew McGregor, 2015. "Responding to the green economy: how REDD+ and the One Map Initiative are transforming forest governance in Indonesia," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(12), pages 2273-2293, December.
    7. Nielsen, Tobias Dan, 2016. "From REDD+ forests to green landscapes? Analyzing the emerging integrated landscape approach discourse in the UNFCCC," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 177-184.
    8. Brockhaus, Maria & Obidzinski, Krystof & Dermawan, Ahmad & Laumonier, Yves & Luttrell, Cecilia, 2012. "An overview of forest and land allocation policies in Indonesia: Is the current framework sufficient to meet the needs of REDD+?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 30-37.
    9. Alison Mathie & Gord Cunningham, 2003. "From clients to citizens: Asset-based Community Development as a strategy for community-driven development," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(5), pages 474-486, November.
    10. Dressler, Wolfram & Roth, Robin, 2011. "The Good, the Bad, and the Contradictory: Neoliberal Conservation Governance in Rural Southeast Asia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 851-862, May.
    11. Belinda Arunarwati Margono & Peter V. Potapov & Svetlana Turubanova & Fred Stolle & Matthew C. Hansen, 2014. "Primary forest cover loss in Indonesia over 2000–2012," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(8), pages 730-735, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boer, Henry James, 2018. "The role of government in operationalising markets for REDD+ in Indonesia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 4-12.
    2. Watts, John D. & Pasaribu, Katryn & Irawan, Silvia & Tacconi, Luca & Martanila, Heni & Wiratama, Cokorda Gde Wisnu & Musthofa, Fauzan Kemal & Sugiarto, Bernadinus Steni & Manvi, Utami Putri, 2021. "Challenges faced by smallholders in achieving sustainable palm oil certification in Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Erik Lilleskov & Kevin McCullough & Kristell Hergoualc’h & Dennis Castillo Torres & Rodney Chimner & Daniel Murdiyarso & Randy Kolka & Laura Bourgeau-Chavez & John Hribljan & Jhon Aguila Pasquel & Cra, 2019. "Is Indonesian peatland loss a cautionary tale for Peru? A two-country comparison of the magnitude and causes of tropical peatland degradation," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 591-623, April.
    4. Erbaugh, James T., 2019. "Responsibilization and social forestry in Indonesia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Jun Harbi & Yukun Cao & Noril Milantara & Gamin & Ade Brian Mustafa & Nathan James Roberts, 2021. "Understanding People−Forest Relationships: A Key Requirement for Appropriate Forest Governance in South Sumatra, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Sloan, Sean & Campbell, Mason J. & Alamgir, Mohammed & Collier-Baker, Emma & Nowak, Matthew G. & Usher, Graham & Laurance, William F., 2018. "Infrastructure development and contested forest governance threaten the Leuser Ecosystem, Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 298-309.
    7. Fischer, Richard & Hargita, Yvonne & Günter, Sven, 2016. "Insights from the ground level? A content analysis review of multi-national REDD+ studies since 2010," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 47-58.
    8. Toumbourou, Tessa, 2020. "Using a Delphi approach to identify the most efficacious interventions to improve Indonesia’s forest and land governance," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Jespersen, Kristjan & Gallemore, Caleb, 2018. "The Institutional Work of Payments for Ecosystem Services: Why the Mundane Should Matter," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 507-519.
    10. Pauliina Upla & James Reed & Kaala B. Moombe & Benjamin J. Kazule & Brian P. Mulenga & Mirjam Ros-Tonen & Terry Sunderland, 2022. "Assessing the Potential for Private Sector Engagement in Integrated Landscape Approaches: Insights from Value-Chain Analyses in Southern Zambia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, September.
    11. Tacconi, Luca & Muttaqin, Muhammad Zahrul, 2019. "Reducing emissions from land use change in Indonesia: An overview," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Moeliono, Moira & Brockhaus, Maria & Gallemore, Caleb & Dwisatrio, Bimo & Maharani, Cynthia D. & Muharrom, Efrian & Pham, Thuy Thu, 2020. "REDD+ in Indonesia: A new mode of governance or just another project?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    13. Krott, Max & Bader, Axel & Schusser, Carsten & Devkota, Rosan & Maryudi, Ahmad & Giessen, Lukas & Aurenhammer, Helene, 2014. "Actor-centred power: The driving force in decentralised community based forest governance," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 34-42.
    14. Veronesi, Marcella & Reutemann, Tim & Zabel, Astrid & Engel, Stefanie, 2015. "Designing REDD+ schemes when forest users are not forest landowners: Evidence from a survey-based experiment in Kenya," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 46-57.
    15. Soukphavanh Sawathvong & Kimihiko Hyakumura, 2024. "A Comparison of the Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) Guidelines and the “Implementation of Governance, Forest Landscapes, and Livelihoods” Project in Lao PDR: The FPIC Team Composition and the," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Mariska JM Bottema & Simon R Bush & Peter Oosterveer, 2021. "Territories of state-led aquaculture risk management: Thailand’s Plang Yai program," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1231-1251, September.
    17. Abril Catzín-Tamayo & Oscar Frausto-Martínez & Lucinda Arroyo-Arcos, 2022. "Stakeholder mapping and promotion of Sustainable Development Goals in local management," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(3), pages 611-626, September.
    18. Hunsberger, Carol & Work, Courtney & Herre, Roman, 2018. "Linking climate change strategies and land conflicts in Cambodia: Evidence from the Greater Aural region," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 309-320.
    19. Shirvani Dastgerdi, Ahmadreza & Sargolini, Massimo & Broussard Allred, Shorna & Chatrchyan, Allison Morrill & Drescher, Michael & DeGeer, Christopher, 2022. "Climate change risk reduction in cultural landscapes: Insights from Cinque Terre and Waterloo," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    20. Suliasi Vunibola, 2023. "“Want to help someone? Shut up and listen”: Foreign aid, maladaptation, and community development practices in the Pacific," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(S2), December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:164:y:2023:i:c:s0305750x22003710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.