IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i12p4777-d190579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Easier the Better: How Processing Fluency Influences Self-Efficacy and Behavioral Intention in Pro-Social Campaign Advertising

Author

Listed:
  • Hee Jin Kim

    (College of Business, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)

  • Jung Min Jang

    (Management and Marketing, Bang College of Business, KIMEP University, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

This study examines how processing fluency influences people’s behavioral intention to perform a pro-social behavior. In particular, we predict that high processing fluency enhances self-efficacy perception which, in turn, increases behavioral intention to participate in a pro-social campaign. Study 1 tested the proposed effect in the context of a pro-environmental campaign. Results showed that individual’s subjective feeling of processing fluency affects the degree of self-efficacy and intention to engage in recycling behavior. Study 2 replicated study 1 in the context of organ donation. In addition, we manipulated the degree of conceptual fluency by differently pairing message framing (gain vs. loss) and background color (blue vs. red). As predicted, participants exposed to campaign advertising with conceptually matching framing-color pairs (blue—gain framing and red—loss framing) expressed a greater level of self-efficacy than those who were exposed to mismatched pairs. In addition, self-efficacy mediated the influence of the color–framing match on the intention to donate organs. Our research contributes to the existing literature by identifying critical drivers that promote actions toward pro-social campaigns. It also provides useful guidelines for marketers who design and implement pro-social campaign communications.

Suggested Citation

  • Hee Jin Kim & Jung Min Jang, 2018. "The Easier the Better: How Processing Fluency Influences Self-Efficacy and Behavioral Intention in Pro-Social Campaign Advertising," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4777-:d:190579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4777/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4777/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. César Tapia-Fonllem & Victor Corral-Verdugo & Blanca Fraijo-Sing & Maria Fernanda Durón-Ramos, 2013. "Assessing Sustainable Behavior and its Correlates: A Measure of Pro-Ecological, Frugal, Altruistic and Equitable Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Kikyoung Park & Gangseog Ryu, 2018. "The Effect of Regulatory Focus on Individuals’ Donation Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Meyers-Levy, Joan & Peracchio, Laura A, 1995. "Understanding the Effects of Color: How the Correspondence between Available and Required Resources Affects Attitudes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(2), pages 121-138, September.
    4. repec:cup:judgdm:v:2:y:2007:i::p:371-379 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Xinshu Zhao & John G. Lynch & Qimei Chen, 2010. "Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 197-206, August.
    6. Boyoun (Grace) Chae & JoAndrea Hoegg, 2013. "The Future Looks "Right": Effects of the Horizontal Location of Advertising Images on Product Attitude," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(2), pages 223-238.
    7. Leonie A. Venhoeven & Jan Willem Bolderdijk & Linda Steg, 2013. "Explaining the Paradox: How Pro-Environmental Behaviour can both Thwart and Foster Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Joon Yong Seo & Debra L. Scammon, 2017. "Do green packages lead to misperceptions? The influence of package colors on consumers’ perceptions of brands with environmental claims," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 357-369, September.
    9. Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne, 1985. "Measuring the Involvement Construct," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(3), pages 341-352, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mathilde van Dijk & Annet-Jantien Smit & Jan-Peter Nap, 2023. "Message Framing and Attitudes Toward Green Gas Facilities in Rural Communities of The Netherlands," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    2. Mohammad Imtiaz Hossain & Mosab I. Tabash & May Ling Siow & Tze San Ong & Suhaib Anagreh, 2023. "Entrepreneurial intentions of Gen Z university students and entrepreneurial constraints in Bangladesh," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-34, December.
    3. José Alberto Martínez-González & Urszula Kobylinska & Francisco J. García-Rodríguez & Lukasz Nazarko, 2019. "Antecedents of Entrepreneurial Intention among Young People: Model and Regional Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-29, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kareklas, Ioannis & Muehling, Darrel D. & King, Skyler, 2019. "The effect of color and self-view priming in persuasive communications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 33-49.
    2. Tibert Verhagen & Daniel Bloemers, 2018. "Exploring the cognitive and affective bases of online purchase intentions: a hierarchical test across product types," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 537-561, September.
    3. Schaefers, Tobias & Leban, Marina & Vogt, Florian, 2022. "On-demand features: Consumer reactions to tangibility and pricing structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 751-761.
    4. Nguyen, Hang T. & Zhang, Yufei & Calantone, Roger J., 2018. "Brand portfolio coherence: Scale development and empirical demonstration," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 60-80.
    5. Bertele, Kerrie & Feiereisen, Stephanie & Storey, Chris & van Laer, Tom, 2020. "It’s not what you say, it’s the way you say it! Effective message styles for promoting innovative new services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 38-49.
    6. Ryan Rahinel & Noelle M. Nelson, 2016. "When Brand Logos Describe the Environment: Design Instability and the Utility of Safety-Oriented Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(3), pages 478-496.
    7. Lewis, Michael & Whitler, Kimberly A. & Hoegg, JoAndrea, 2013. "Customer Relationship Stage and the Use of Picture-Dominant versus Text-Dominant Advertising: A Field Study," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 263-280.
    8. Yong Zhang & Chuling Lin & Jialing Yang, 2019. "Time or Money? The Influence of Warm and Competent Appeals on Donation Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Hsieh, Jung-Kuei & Hsieh, Yi-Ching & Chiu, Hung-Chang & Yang, Ya-Ru, 2014. "Customer Response to Web Site Atmospherics: Task-relevant Cues, Situational Involvement and PAD," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 225-236.
    10. Strzelecka, Marianna & Nisbett, Gwendelyn S. & Woosnam, Kyle M., 2017. "The hedonic nature of conservation volunteer travel," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 417-425.
    11. Wang, Haizhong & Shen, Manqiong & (Amy) Song, Yiping & Phau, Ian, 2020. "Do up-displayed eco-friendly products always perform better? The moderating role of psychological distance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 198-212.
    12. Stokburger-Sauer, Nicola E. & Teichmann, Karin, 2013. "Is luxury just a female thing? The role of gender in luxury brand consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 889-896.
    13. Meredith E. David & James A. Roberts, 2020. "Developing and Testing a Scale Designed to Measure Perceived Phubbing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-15, November.
    14. Togawa, Taku & Ishii, Hiroaki & Park, Jaewoo & Roy, Rajat, 2023. "The temperature of newness: How vision–temperature correspondence in advertising influences newness perception and product evaluation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    15. Qing Yuan & HakJun Song & Nan Chen & Wenwen Shang, 2019. "Roles of Tourism Involvement and Place Attachment in Determining Residents’ Attitudes Toward Industrial Heritage Tourism in a Resource-Exhausted City in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, September.
    16. Xi Li & Runzhe Yu & Xinwei Su, 2021. "Environmental Beliefs and Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intention of an Environmentally Themed Exhibition Audience: The Mediation Role of Exhibition Attachment," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    17. Hufnagel, Gerrit & Schwaiger, Manfred & Weritz, Louisa, 2022. "Seeking the perfect price: Consumer responses to personalized price discrimination in e-commerce," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 346-365.
    18. Koo, Jakeun & Lee, Younghan, 2019. "Sponsor-event congruence effects: The moderating role of sport involvement and mediating role of sponsor attitudes," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 222-234.
    19. Jeannot, Florence & Dampérat, Maud & Salvador, Marielle & El Euch Maalej, Mariem & Jongmans, Eline, 2022. "Toward a luxury restaurant renewal: Antecedents and consequences of digitalized gastronomy experiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 518-539.
    20. Inoue, Yuhei & Funk, Daniel C. & McDonald, Heath, 2017. "Predicting behavioral loyalty through corporate social responsibility: The mediating role of involvement and commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 46-56.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4777-:d:190579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.