IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i12p4767-d190409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Sustainable Urban Communities: A Composite Spatial Accessibility Assessment for Residential Suitability Based on Network Big Data

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Zhao

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, the Institute of the Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Guoqin Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, the Institute of the Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China)

  • Tao Lin

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, the Institute of the Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China)

  • Xiaofang Liu

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, the Institute of the Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    School of Architecture, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China)

  • Jiakun Liu

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, the Institute of the Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Meixia Lin

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, the Institute of the Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Hong Ye

    (Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, the Institute of the Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China)

  • Lingjie Kong

    (School of Architecture, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China)

Abstract

Suitable allocation of residential public services is vital to realizing sustainable communities and cities. By combining network big data and spatial analysis, we developed a composite spatial accessibility assessment method for residential suitability of urban public services covering healthcare, leisure, commerce, transportation, and education services. Xiamen City, China is the test site. We found that although most facilities were concentrated on Xiamen Island, there were shortages in the per capita transportation and education service supplements compared with the average performance of Xiamen City because of the high local population. Meanwhile, Tong’an had advantages in the amount of public facilities due to its long history of regional development. However, high-quality facilities were deficient there as well as in other off-island districts. The residential communities surrounding transportation, commerce, and healthcare facilities had a similar allocation pattern in Xiamen City, whereas the residential accessibility of education and leisure services showed regional differences. Due to unbalanced regional development, evident inequality could be witnessed by comparing the composite assessment results of residential suitability between the communities on Xiamen Island and those in the off-island Areas. Our study hopes to provide dedicated support for designing sustainable communities and cities, especially for those in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Zhao & Guoqin Zhang & Tao Lin & Xiaofang Liu & Jiakun Liu & Meixia Lin & Hong Ye & Lingjie Kong, 2018. "Towards Sustainable Urban Communities: A Composite Spatial Accessibility Assessment for Residential Suitability Based on Network Big Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4767-:d:190409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4767/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4767/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoshu Cao & Huiling Chen & Feiwen Liang & Wulin Wang, 2018. "Measurement and Spatial Differentiation Characteristics of Transit Equity: A Case Study of Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    2. D. J. Weiss & A. Nelson & H. S. Gibson & W. Temperley & S. Peedell & A. Lieber & M. Hancher & E. Poyart & S. Belchior & N. Fullman & B. Mappin & U. Dalrymple & J. Rozier & T. C. D. Lucas & R. E. Howes, 2018. "A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015," Nature, Nature, vol. 553(7688), pages 333-336, January.
    3. Shiann Ming Wu & Tsung-chun Chen & Yenchun Jim Wu & Miltiadis Lytras, 2018. "Smart Cities in Taiwan: A Perspective on Big Data Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Kinman, Edward L., 1999. "Evaluating health service equity at a primary care clinic in Chilimarca, Bolivia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(5), pages 663-678, September.
    5. Karl Bruckmeier, 2009. "Sustainability between Necessity, Contingency and Impossibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 1(4), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Kontodimopoulos, Nick & Nanos, Panagiotis & Niakas, Dimitris, 2006. "Balancing efficiency of health services and equity of access in remote areas in Greece," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 49-57, March.
    7. Dorota Kamrowska-Zaluska & Hanna Obracht-Prondzyńska, 2018. "The Use of Big Data in Regenerative Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Widener, Michael J. & Farber, Steven & Neutens, Tijs & Horner, Mark, 2015. "Spatiotemporal accessibility to supermarkets using public transit: an interaction potential approach in Cincinnati, Ohio," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 72-83.
    9. Miltiadis D. Lytras & Anna Visvizi, 2018. "Who Uses Smart City Services and What to Make of It: Toward Interdisciplinary Smart Cities Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Ali Kharrazi & Hua Qin & Yi Zhang, 2016. "Urban Big Data and Sustainable Development Goals: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-6, December.
    11. Philip Stessens & Ahmed Z. Khan & Marijke Huysmans & Frank Canters, 2017. "Analysing urban green space accessibility and quality: A GIS-based model as spatial decision support for urban ecosystem services in Brussels," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/284472, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    12. Caige Sun & Tao Lin & Yu Zhao & Meixia Lin & Zhaowu Yu, 2017. "Residential Spatial Differentiation Based on Urban Housing Types—An Empirical Study of Xiamen Island, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ashraf Abd El Karim & Mohsen M. Awawdeh, 2020. "Integrating GIS Accessibility and Location-Allocation Models with Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Evaluating Quality of Life in Buraidah City, KSA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, February.
    2. Jing Xu & Zhiming Yan & Sai Hu & Chunling Pu, 2022. "The Spatial Distribution and Optimization of Medical and Health Land from the Perspective of Public Service Equalization: A Case Study of Urumqi City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Younes Delhoum & Rachid Belaroussi & Francis Dupin & Mahdi Zargayouna, 2020. "Activity-Based Demand Modeling for a Future Urban District," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Jinling Sui & Tao Lin & Guoqin Zhang & Hong Ye & Meixia Lin & Hongkai Geng & Yukui Zhang, 2023. "Equity and Driving Factors of Medical Service Supply–Demand Balance for the Elderly in Rapidly Urbanized Communities Based on Big Data Analysis—A Case Study of Xiamen City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Mingyuan Chang & Longyang Huang & Tianlin Zhai & Jiawei Zhu & Yuanbo Ma & Ling Li & Chenchen Zhao, 2023. "A Challenge of Sustainable Urbanization: Mapping the Equity of Urban Public Facilities in Multiple Dimensions in Zhengzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Peishen Wu & Mei Liu, 2022. "A Framework for the Spatial Inequality in Urban Public Facility for Urban Planning, Design and Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Linlin Zhang & Tao Zhou & Chao Mao, 2019. "Does the Difference in Urban Public Facility Allocation Cause Spatial Inequality in Housing Prices? Evidence from Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Yunfeng Hu & Yueqi Han, 2019. "Identification of Urban Functional Areas Based on POI Data: A Case Study of the Guangzhou Economic and Technological Development Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Zinette Bergman & Manfred Max Bergman, 2022. "Toward Sustainable Communities: A Case Study of the Eastern Market in Detroit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Tingting Liu & Xiaoxian Zhu & Mengqiu Cao, 2022. "Impacts of Reduced Inequalities on Quality Education: Examining the Relationship between Regional Sustainability and Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Visvizi & Miltiadis D. Lytras, 2018. "It’s Not a Fad: Smart Cities and Smart Villages Research in European and Global Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-10, August.
    2. Shiann Ming Wu & Dongqiang Guo & Yenchun Jim Wu & Yung Chang Wu, 2018. "Future Development of Taiwan’s Smart Cities from an Information Security Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Gabriel Koman & Dominika Tumová & Radoslav Jankal & Martin Mičiak, 2022. "Business-making supported via the application of big data to achieve economic sustainability," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(4), pages 336-358, June.
    4. Giacomo Falchetta & Nicolò Stevanato & Magda Moner-Girona & Davide Mazzoni & Emanuela Colombo & Manfred Hafner, 2020. "M-LED: Multi-sectoral Latent Electricity Demand Assessment for Energy Access Planning," Working Papers 2020.09, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    5. Maria Vincenza Ciasullo & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi & Daniele Leone, 2020. "Multi-level governance for sustainable innovation in smart communities: an ecosystems approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1167-1195, December.
    6. Junghwan Kim & Mei-Po Kwan, 2018. "Beyond Commuting: Ignoring Individuals’ Activity-Travel Patterns May Lead to Inaccurate Assessments of Their Exposure to Traffic Congestion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Andre Python & Andreas Bender & Marta Blangiardo & Janine B. Illian & Ying Lin & Baoli Liu & Tim C.D. Lucas & Siwei Tan & Yingying Wen & Davit Svanidze & Jianwei Yin, 2022. "A downscaling approach to compare COVID‐19 count data from databases aggregated at different spatial scales," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 202-218, January.
    8. Ian Sutherland & Youngseok Sim & Seul Ki Lee & Jaemun Byun & Kiattipoom Kiatkawsin, 2020. "Topic Modeling of Online Accommodation Reviews via Latent Dirichlet Allocation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Antoine Leblois, 2021. "Mitigating the impact of bad rainy seasons in poor agricultural regions to tackle deforestation," Post-Print hal-03111007, HAL.
    10. Ida Skubis & Radosław Wolniak & Wiesław Wes Grebski, 2024. "AI and Human-Centric Approach in Smart Cities Management: Case Studies from Silesian and Lesser Poland Voivodships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-26, September.
    11. De Boeck, Kim & Decouttere, Catherine & Jónasson, Jónas Oddur & Vandaele, Nico, 2022. "Vaccine supply chains in resource-limited settings: Mitigating the impact of rainy season disruptions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 300-317.
    12. Chiara Cortinovis & Grazia Zulian & Davide Geneletti, 2018. "Assessing Nature-Based Recreation to Support Urban Green Infrastructure Planning in Trento (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Jaroslav Burian & Karel Macků & Jarmila Zimmermannová & Barbora Kočvarová, 2018. "Spatio-Temporal Changes and Dependencies of Land Prices: A Case Study of the City of Olomouc," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Thales A. P. West & Sven Wunder & Erin O. Sills & Jan Borner & Sami W. Rifai & Alexandra N. Neidermeier & Andreas Kontoleon, 2023. "Action needed to make carbon offsets from tropical forest conservation work for climate change mitigation," Papers 2301.03354, arXiv.org.
    15. Yanfang Zhang & Mushang Lee, 2019. "A Hybrid Model for Addressing the Relationship between Financial Performance and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    17. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    18. Yang Yang & Ruizhen He & Guohang Tian & Zhen Shi & Xinyu Wang & Albert Fekete, 2022. "Equity Study on Urban Park Accessibility Based on Improved 2SFCA Method in Zhengzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    19. Shon, Huijoo, 2024. "Urbanicity and child health in 26 sub-Saharan African countries: Settlement type and its association with mortality and morbidity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    20. Gabriella Vitorino Guimarães & Tálita Floriano Santos & Vicente Aprigliano Fernandes & Jorge Eliécer Córdoba Maquilón & Marcelino Aurélio Vieira da Silva, 2020. "Assessment for the Social Sustainability and Equity under the Perspective of Accessibility to Jobs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4767-:d:190409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.