IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i12p4581-d187761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of an Improved Model to Evaluate Vulnerability in Spring Wheat under Climate Change in Inner Mongolia

Author

Listed:
  • Dongliang Fan

    (China Meteorological Administration Training Centre, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Feiyun Yang

    (China Meteorological Administration Training Centre, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Zhihua Pan

    (College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Xiaoyun Su

    (College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Yuying Pan

    (College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Guolin Han

    (College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Jialin Wang

    (College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Dong Wu

    (College of Applied Meterology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Zhiqiang Dong

    (College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

Abstract

Climate change has had a significant impact on agricultural production. It is important to evaluate the vulnerability of agricultural production to climate change. The previous methods for evaluating vulnerability are inconsiderate and unrealistic. This paper proposes an improved vulnerability assessment method, introduces the Agricultural Production System Simulator (APSIM)-wheat model to evaluate vulnerability, and uses spring wheat, in Inner Mongolia, China, as an example for evaluating the vulnerability of spring wheat under climate change. The results show that, from 1996 to 2015, the adaptability to climate change of spring wheat production, in Inner Mongolia, increased, and its sensitivity to climate change decreased. That is to say, that climatic conditions have a negative impact on spring wheat, and adaptation measures have a positive impact on spring wheat. From 1996 to 2009, the vulnerability of spring wheat production in Inner Mongolia showed a very significant increasing trend, while showing a significant downward trend during 2009–2015, which is consistent with the actual situation. The improved vulnerability assessment method can reflect the actual impact of climatic conditions on agricultural production. We expect that the new vulnerability assessment method can provide a theoretical basis for studying the impact of climate change on agricultural production.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongliang Fan & Feiyun Yang & Zhihua Pan & Xiaoyun Su & Yuying Pan & Guolin Han & Jialin Wang & Dong Wu & Zhiqiang Dong, 2018. "Development of an Improved Model to Evaluate Vulnerability in Spring Wheat under Climate Change in Inner Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4581-:d:187761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4581/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4581/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McCown, R.L. & Hammer, G.L. & Hargreaves, J.N.G. & Holzworth, D. & Huth, N.I., 1995. "APSIM: an agricultural production system simulation model for operational research," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 225-231.
    2. Sioshansi, Fereidoon P., 2005. "Global climate change: here to stay," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 240-246, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Na Huang & Jialin Wang & Yu Song & Yuying Pan & Guolin Han & Ziyuan Zhang & Shangqian Ma & Guofeng Sun & Cong Liu & Zhihua Pan, 2022. "The adaptation mechanism based on an integrated vulnerability assessment of potato production to climate change in Inner Mongolia, China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard, Bastien & Bonté, Bruno & Delmas, Magalie & Braud, Isabelle & Cheviron, Bruno & Veyssier, Julien & Barreteau, Olivier, 2022. "A co-simulation approach to study the impact of gravity collective irrigation constraints on plant dynamics in Southern France," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    2. Hao, Shirui & Ryu, Dongryeol & Western, Andrew & Perry, Eileen & Bogena, Heye & Franssen, Harrie Jan Hendricks, 2021. "Performance of a wheat yield prediction model and factors influencing the performance: A review and meta-analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    3. Dokoohaki, Hamze & Gheysari, Mahdi & Mousavi, Sayed-Farhad & Zand-Parsa, Shahrokh & Miguez, Fernando E. & Archontoulis, Sotirios V. & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2016. "Coupling and testing a new soil water module in DSSAT CERES-Maize model for maize production under semi-arid condition," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 90-99.
    4. Georg Weinhofer & Volker H. Hoffmann, 2010. "Mitigating climate change – how do corporate strategies differ?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 77-89, February.
    5. McNeill, Kelsie & Macdonald, Kiera & Singh, Ashutosh & Binns, Andrew D., 2017. "Food and water security: Analysis of integrated modeling platforms," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 100-112.
    6. Luedeling, Eike & Smethurst, Philip J. & Baudron, Frédéric & Bayala, Jules & Huth, Neil I. & van Noordwijk, Meine & Ong, Chin K. & Mulia, Rachmat & Lusiana, Betha & Muthuri, Catherine & Sinclair, Ferg, 2016. "Field-scale modeling of tree–crop interactions: Challenges and development needs," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 51-69.
    7. Jiang, Yiwen & Zhang, Lanhui & Zhang, Baoqing & He, Chansheng & Jin, Xin & Bai, Xiao, 2016. "Modeling irrigation management for water conservation by DSSAT-maize model in arid northwestern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 37-45.
    8. You, Yang & Wang, Yakun & Fan, Xiaodong & Dai, Qin & Yang, Guang & Wang, Wene & Chen, Dianyu & Hu, Xiaotao, 2024. "Progress in joint application of crop models and hydrological models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    9. Spanjer, Aldo, 2006. "European gas regulation: a change of focus," MPRA Paper 21146, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4581-:d:187761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.