IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i12p4397-d185275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of the Spatiotemporal Variation Characteristics of Forest Landscape Patterns in Shanghai from 2004 to 2014 Based on Multisource Remote Sensing Data

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Li

    (Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
    Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210046, China
    School of Geographic Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China)

  • Chunyan Xue

    (Shanghai Forestry Station, Shanghai 200072, China)

  • Hua Shao

    (College of Geomatics Science and Technology, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China)

  • Ge Shi

    (Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
    Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210046, China
    School of Geographic Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China)

  • Nan Jiang

    (Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
    Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210046, China
    School of Geographic Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China)

Abstract

The landscape patterns of urban forests not only reflect the influence of urbanization on urban forests, but also determines its function in urban ecosystem services. In the case of mastering the overall forest landscape pattern of a city, a study of the structure of urban forest landscapes at different scales and in urbanized regions is beneficial to a comprehensive understanding of the forest characteristics of a city. In the present study, an attempt was made to map and monitor the spatio-temporal dynamics of an urban forest in Shanghai from 2004 to 2014 using remote sensing techniques. Methods of landscape ecology analysis are followed to quantify the spatiotemporal patterns of an urban forest landscape by urban and rural gradient regionalization. The results show that the spatial structure of an urban forest landscape is essentially consistent with an urban landscape pattern. Due to strong interference from human activities, the ecological quality of forest landscapes is low. At the landscape level, the urban forest coverage rate increased from 11.43% in 2004 to 16.02% in 2014, however, the number of large patches decreased, there was a high degree of urban forest landscape fragmentation, landscape connectivity was poor, landscape patch boundaries were uniform, and weak links were present between ecological processes. Different urban and rural gradient division methods exhibit obvious gradient characteristics along the urban–rural gradient in Shanghai. The regional differences in the urban forest landscape ecological characteristics have further increased as a result of urban planning and zoning. The total amount of urban forest is located closer to the urban center, which has the smallest total amount of forest; however, in terms of urban forest coverage, the suburbs have more coverage than do the outer suburbs and the central urban areas. The urban forest landscape’s spatial distribution area is evidently different. Urbanization affects the areas closest to urban residential areas, which are markedly disturbed by humans, and the urban forest landscape has a high degree of fragmentation. The forest patches have become divided and unconnected, and the degree of natural connectivity has gradually decreased over the past 10 years. At the landscape class level, broadleaf forests are dominant in Shanghai, and their area exhibits an increasing trend; shrublands and needleleaf forests, however, show a decreasing trend. Compared with other forest types, the spatial distribution of broadleaf forest is concentrated in the suburbs, and the aggregation effect is relatively apparent. From the perspective of urban forest landscape pattern aggregation characteristics in Shanghai, the spatial distribution of urban forest landscape point patterns in the study area exhibit extremely uneven characteristics. The point density of urban forest patches larger than 1 ha in Shanghai increased from 2004 to 2014. However, the total number of patches with areas larger than 5 ha decreased, and this decrease plays an important role in the ecological environment. In the past 10 years, the concentration characteristics of urban forests with large patches has gradually decreased. In 2014, the urban forest landscapes decreased by 5 km compared to the intensity of aggregates in 2004, which also indicates that urban forests in Shanghai tend to be fragmented. The results of this study can be useful to help improve urban residents’ living environments and the sustainable development of the urban ecosystem, and they will also be vital to future management.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Li & Chunyan Xue & Hua Shao & Ge Shi & Nan Jiang, 2018. "Study of the Spatiotemporal Variation Characteristics of Forest Landscape Patterns in Shanghai from 2004 to 2014 Based on Multisource Remote Sensing Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-33, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4397-:d:185275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4397/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/12/4397/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wen Wu & Yuehui Li & Yuanman Hu & Chunliang Xiu & Xiaolu Yan, 2018. "Impacts of Changing Forest Management Areas on Forest Landscapes and Habitat Patterns in Northeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Eric Marcon & Florence Puech, 2009. "Generalizing Ripley's K function to inhomogeneous populations," Working Papers halshs-00372631, HAL.
    3. Konijnendijk, Cecil C., 2003. "A decade of urban forestry in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 173-186, July.
    4. Zimu Jia & Bingran Ma & Jing Zhang & Weihua Zeng, 2018. "Simulating Spatial-Temporal Changes of Land-Use Based on Ecological Redline Restrictions and Landscape Driving Factors: A Case Study in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Jinghui Li & Wei Fang & Tao Wang & Salman Qureshi & Juha M. Alatalo & Yang Bai, 2017. "Correlations between Socioeconomic Drivers and Indicators of Urban Expansion: Evidence from the Heavily Urbanised Shanghai Metropolitan Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yifan Zhu & Chengkang Wang & Takeru Sakai, 2019. "Remote Sensing-Based Analysis of Landscape Pattern Evolution in Industrial Rural Areas: A Case of Southern Jiangsu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin Meng & Wentao Si, 2022. "The Driving Mechanism of Urban Land Expansion from 2005 to 2018: The Case of Yangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Feng, Rundong & Wang, Kaiyong, 2022. "The direct and lag effects of administrative division adjustment on urban expansion patterns in Chinese mega-urban agglomerations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Zhanzhong Tang & Zengxiang Zhang & Lijun Zuo & Xiao Wang & Shunguang Hu & Zijuan Zhu, 2020. "Spatial Econometric Analysis of the Relationship between Urban Land and Regional Economic Development in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Coordinated Development Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-21, October.
    4. H. Oğuz Çoban & Ömer K. Örücü & E. Seda Arslan, 2020. "MaxEnt Modeling for Predicting the Current and Future Potential Geographical Distribution of Quercus libani Olivier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Ruci Wang & Ahmed Derdouri & Yuji Murayama, 2018. "Spatiotemporal Simulation of Future Land Use/Cover Change Scenarios in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    6. He, Wenjian & Cheng, Yu & Lin, Ying & Zhang, Hongxiao, 2022. "Microeconomic effects of designating National Forest Cities: Evidence from China's publicly traded manufacturing companies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    7. Natalia Levashova & Alla Sidorova & Anna Semina & Mingkang Ni, 2019. "A Spatio-Temporal Autowave Model of Shanghai Territory Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Wenbo Cai & Wei Jiang & Hongyu Du & Ruishan Chen & Yongli Cai, 2021. "Assessing Ecosystem Services Supply-Demand (Mis)Matches for Differential City Management in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Vujcic, Maja & Tomicevic-Dubljevic, Jelena, 2018. "Urban forest benefits to the younger population: The case study of the city of Belgrade, Serbia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 54-62.
    10. Vasyl Yukhnovskyi & Olha Zibtseva, 2019. "Normalization of green space as a component of ecological stability of a town," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(11), pages 428-437.
    11. Zhenbo Wang, 2018. "Land Spatial Development Based on Carrying Capacity, Land Development Potential, and Efficiency of Urban Agglomerations in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Yingen Hu & Ye Zhang & Xinli Ke, 2018. "Dynamics of Tradeoffs between Economic Benefits and Ecosystem Services due to Urban Expansion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    13. HAMIDOUCHE M’hamed & BOURCHID ABDELKADER Salim, 2020. "Concentration of Economic Activities in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 01, March.
    14. Benhui Zhu & Shizuka Hashimoto, 2021. "Is Expansion or Regulation more Critical for Existing Protected Areas? A Case Study on China’s Eco-Redline Policy in Chongqing Capital," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, October.
    15. Emilia Janeczko & Radosław Dąbrowski & Joanna Budnicka-Kosior & Małgorzata Woźnicka, 2019. "Influence of Urbanization Processes on the Dynamics and Scale of Spatial Transformations in the Mazowiecki Landscape Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-12, May.
    16. Deddy Romulo Siagian & Rajendra P. Shrestha & Sangam Shrestha & John K. M. Kuwornu, 2019. "Factors Driving Rice Land Change 1989–2018 in the Deli Serdang Regency, Indonesia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-22, August.
    17. Ann Van Herzele, 2006. "A Forest for Each City and Town: Story Lines in the Policy Debate for Urban Forests in Flanders," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(3), pages 673-696, March.
    18. Dechao Chen & Xinliang Xu & Zongyao Sun & Luo Liu & Zhi Qiao & Tai Huang, 2019. "Assessment of Urban Heat Risk in Mountain Environments: A Case Study of Chongqing Metropolitan Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Chunsheng Wu, 2022. "Study on the Spatial Differences in Land-Use Change and Driving Factors in Tibet," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Neelam C. Poudyal & Jacek P. Siry & J. M. Bowker, 2012. "Stakeholders' Engagement in Promoting Sustainable Development: Businesses and Urban Forest Carbon," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 157-169, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:4397-:d:185275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.