IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i11p3852-d177895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Travel Choice Analysis under Metro Emergency Context: Utility? Regret? Or Both?

Author

Listed:
  • Xingchuan Wang

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
    MOE Key Laboratory for Urban Transportation Complex Systems Theory and Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Enjian Yao

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
    MOE Key Laboratory for Urban Transportation Complex Systems Theory and Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Shasha Liu

    (School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
    MOE Key Laboratory for Urban Transportation Complex Systems Theory and Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

Abstract

With the continuous expansion of the network scale and increasing of passengers, metro emergencies such as operational equipment failure are happening more frequently. Due to the narrow space and crowds of people, metro emergencies always have more of an impact than road traffic emergencies. In order to adopt appropriate measures to ensure passenger safety and avoid risks, we need to get a better understanding of passengers’ travel choice behaviors under emergencies. Most of the existing research studies related to travel choice behaviors took the random utility maximization (RUM) principle for granted, but failed to realize the potential of different decision-making processes and changes to the decision-making environment. In this research, we aim to analyze metro passengers’ travel choice behaviors under metro network emergency contexts. Based on the data collected from a survey about travel choices under metro emergencies in the Guangzhou Metro, we compared the performances of models that follow the RUM and random regret minimization (RRM) principles, and established a hybrid RUM-RRM model as well as a nested logit model following RRM (NL-RRM) to estimate the effects of various factors on passengers’ travel choice behaviors. Comparisons illustrate that the hybrid model and NL-RRM model can improve model fit, and the combination of RUM and RRM outperforms either of them respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingchuan Wang & Enjian Yao & Shasha Liu, 2018. "Travel Choice Analysis under Metro Emergency Context: Utility? Regret? Or Both?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3852-:d:177895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3852/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/11/3852/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raveau, Sebastián & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & de Grange, Louis, 2011. "A topological route choice model for metro," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 138-147, February.
    2. Chorus, Caspar & van Cranenburgh, Sander & Dekker, Thijs, 2014. "Random regret minimization for consumer choice modeling: Assessment of empirical evidence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2428-2436.
    3. Soora Rasouli & Harry Timmermans, 2017. "Specification of regret-based models of choice behaviour: formal analyses and experimental design based evidence," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1555-1576, November.
    4. Mara Thiene & Marco Boeri & Caspar Chorus, 2012. "Random Regret Minimization: Exploration of a New Choice Model for Environmental and Resource Economics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 51(3), pages 413-429, March.
    5. Chorus, Caspar G., 2014. "A Generalized Random Regret Minimization model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 224-238.
    6. Daniel (Jian) Sun & Yuhan Zhao & Qing-Chang Lu, 2015. "Vulnerability Analysis of Urban Rail Transit Networks: A Case Study of Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Loomes, Graham & Sugden, Robert, 1982. "Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 92(368), pages 805-824, December.
    8. Chorus, Caspar G. & Arentze, Theo A. & Timmermans, Harry J.P., 2008. "A Random Regret-Minimization model of travel choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Yan Han & Wanying Li & Shanshan Wei & Tiantian Zhang, 2018. "Research on Passenger’s Travel Mode Choice Behavior Waiting at Bus Station Based on SEM-Logit Integration Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Peng Jing & Mengxuan Zhao & Meiling He & Long Chen, 2018. "Travel Mode and Travel Route Choice Behavior Based on Random Regret Minimization: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Caspar G Chorus & John M Rose & David A Hensher, 2013. "Regret Minimization or Utility Maximization: It Depends on the Attribute," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(1), pages 154-169, February.
    12. Carlos F. Daganzo & Yosef Sheffi, 1977. "On Stochastic Models of Traffic Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 253-274, August.
    13. Nguyen, T.P. Khanh & Beugin, Julie & Marais, Juliette, 2015. "Method for evaluating an extended Fault Tree to analyse the dependability of complex systems: Application to a satellite-based railway system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 300-313.
    14. Daniel McFadden, 1975. "The Revealed Preferences of a Government Bureaucracy: Theory," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 6(2), pages 401-416, Autumn.
    15. Newman, Jeffrey P. & Lurkin, Virginie & Garrow, Laurie A., 2018. "Computational methods for estimating multinomial, nested, and cross-nested logit models that account for semi-aggregate data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 28-40.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luan, Siliang & Yang, Qingfang & Jiang, Zhongtai & Wang, Wei, 2021. "Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on individual's travel mode choice in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 271-280.
    2. Chengli Cong & Xuan Li & Shiwei Yang & Quan Zhang & Lili Lu & Yang Shi, 2022. "Impact Estimation of Unplanned Urban Rail Disruptions on Public Transport Passengers: A Multi-Agent Based Simulation Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Lim, Jooyoung & Hahn, Minhi, 2020. "Regulatory focus and decision rules: Are prevention-focused consumers regret minimizers?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 343-350.
    4. Hongyou Lu & Yunchan Zhu & Yu Qi & Jinliang Yu, 2018. "Do Urban Subway Openings Reduce PM 2.5 Concentrations? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Chen, Tiantian & Fu, Xiaowen & Hensher, David A. & Li, Zhi-Chun & Sze, N.N., 2024. "Effects of proactive and reactive health control measures on public transport preferences of passengers – A stated preference study during the COVID-19 pandemic," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 175-192.
    6. He, Sylvia Y. & Tao, Sui & Sun, Ka Kit, 2024. "Attitudes towards public transport under extended disruptions and massive-scale transit dysfunction: A Hong Kong case study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 247-258.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Cranenburgh, Sander & Guevara, Cristian Angelo & Chorus, Caspar G., 2015. "New insights on random regret minimization models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 91-109.
    2. Peng Jing & Mengxuan Zhao & Meiling He & Long Chen, 2018. "Travel Mode and Travel Route Choice Behavior Based on Random Regret Minimization: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Sunghoon Jang & Soora Rasouli & Harry Timmermans, 2017. "Incorporating psycho-physical mapping into random regret choice models: model specifications and empirical performance assessments," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 999-1019, September.
    4. Lim, Jooyoung & Hahn, Minhi, 2020. "Regulatory focus and decision rules: Are prevention-focused consumers regret minimizers?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 343-350.
    5. Caspar G. Chorus & Sander Cranenburgh, 2018. "Specification of regret-based models of choice behaviour: formal analyses and experimental design based evidence—commentary," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 247-256, January.
    6. Chorus, Caspar & van Cranenburgh, Sander & Dekker, Thijs, 2014. "Random regret minimization for consumer choice modeling: Assessment of empirical evidence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2428-2436.
    7. van Cranenburgh, Sander & Prato, Carlo G., 2016. "On the robustness of random regret minimization modelling outcomes towards omitted attributes," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 51-70.
    8. Boeri, Marco & Longo, Alberto, 2017. "The importance of regret minimization in the choice for renewable energy programmes: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 253-260.
    9. Fernandez Pernett, Stephanie & Amaya, Johanna & Arellana, Julián & Cantillo, Victor, 2022. "Questioning the implication of the utility-maximization assumption for the estimation of deprivation cost functions after disasters," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    10. Luan, Siliang & Yang, Qingfang & Jiang, Zhongtai & Wang, Wei, 2021. "Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on individual's travel mode choice in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 271-280.
    11. Shi An & Ze Wang & Jianxun Cui, 2015. "Integrating Regret Psychology to Travel Mode Choice for a Transit-Oriented Evacuation Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Chorus, Caspar G., 2014. "A Generalized Random Regret Minimization model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 224-238.
    13. Dekker, Thijs, 2014. "Indifference based value of time measures for Random Regret Minimisation models," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 10-20.
    14. Tian, Qi & Zhao, Jinhua, 2018. "Regret Minimization in Decision Making: Implications for Choice Modeling and Policy Design," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274016, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Kim, Jinhee & Rasouli, Soora & Timmermans, Harry, 2017. "Satisfaction and uncertainty in car-sharing decisions: An integration of hybrid choice and random regret-based models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 13-33.
    16. Sunghoon Jang & Soora Rasouli & Harry Timmermans, 2018. "Accounting for cognitive effort in random regret-only models: Effect of attribute variation and choice set size," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(5), pages 842-863, September.
    17. van Cranenburgh, Sander & Chorus, Caspar G., 2018. "Does the decision rule matter for large-scale transport models?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 338-353.
    18. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid, 2019. "Laboratory experimentation and simulation of discrete direction choices: Investigating hypothetical bias, decision-rule effect and external validity based on aggregate prediction measures," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 134-157.
    19. Caspar G. Chorus, 2014. "Capturing alternative decision rules in travel choice models: a critical discussion," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 13, pages 290-310, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Giovanna Piracci & Fabio Boncinelli & Leonardo Casini, 2023. "Investigating Consumer Preferences for Sustainable Packaging Through a Different Behavioural Approach: A Random Regret Minimization Application," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 86(1), pages 1-27, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:11:p:3852-:d:177895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.