IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v8y2018i3p85-d169269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Boxing Is Our Business’: The Embodiment of a Leftist Identity in Boxe Popolare

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenzo Pedrini

    (Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

Based on two-year ethnography of boxe popolare—a style of boxing codified by Italian leftist grassroots groups—and participant observation of a palestra popolare in an Italian city, the article purports to (a) deepen understanding of the nexus between physical cultures and politics and (b) contribute to understanding the renewal of political cultures by overcoming the disembodied perspectives on ideology. The first section of the paper tracks down the relation that ties boxing to the sociocultural matrix of the leftist grassroots groups. Boxing draws its significance from the antagonistic culture of the informal political youth organisations in which the practice is embedded and reflects the main changes that have been occurring in the collective action repertoires of the street-level political forces over the past few decades. The second section analyses the daily activities of boxe popolare. The paper thereby demonstrates how training regimes manipulate the bodies to inculcate a set of corporeal postures and sensibilities inherent to a mythology of otherness peculiar to the far-left ethos. In conclusion, the lived experience of boxe popolare addresses the importance of placing the situated practices and the socialised body at the centre of the study of political cultures in the contemporary post-ideological era.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo Pedrini, 2018. "‘Boxing Is Our Business’: The Embodiment of a Leftist Identity in Boxe Popolare," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-29, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:85-:d:169269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/8/3/85/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/8/3/85/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George Jennings, 2014. "Transmitting Health Philosophies through the Traditionalist Chinese Martial Arts in the UK," Societies, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Alex Channon, 2014. "Towards the “Undoing” of Gender in Mixed-Sex Martial Arts and Combat Sports," Societies, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Della Porta, Donatella & Mosca, Lorenzo, 2005. "Global-net for Global Movements? A Network of Networks for a Movement of Movements," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 165-190, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David H. K. Brown, 2019. "Physical Culture," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Favor Campbell & Myra B. Haverda & John P. Bartkowski, 2021. "Rival Bodies: Negotiating Gender and Embodiment in Women’s Bikini and Figure Competitions," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-36, February.
    2. Weeber, Stan, 2013. "Online Citizens, Missing Persons and the Police: Three Case Studies," MPRA Paper 48335, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Olessia Y. Koltsova & Galina I. Selivanova, 2015. "Explaining Offline Participation in a Social Movement with Online Data: The Case of Observers for Fair Elections," HSE Working papers WP BRP 67/SOC/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    4. Cayli Baris, 2012. "The Impossible Mission: Global Justice Movement Against Transnational Organized Crime," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-26, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:85-:d:169269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.