IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v14y2024i9p161-d1464627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultivating Community: Addressing Social Sustainability in Rapidly Urbanizing Hyderabad City, Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Hina Marvi

    (Department of Architecture and Planning, Shaheed Allah Buksh Soomro University of Art, Design and Heritages, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan)

  • Saima Kalwar

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan)

  • Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan)

  • Irfan Ahmed Memon

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan)

  • Mehnaz Soomro

    (Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, Aror University of Art, Architecture, Design and Heritage Sindh, RCW Rohri Bypass, Sukkur 65170, Pakistan)

  • Noman Ahsan

    (Higher Education Commission, Karachi City 70500, Pakistan)

Abstract

In the modern dialogue of urban planning, social sustainability emerges as a crucial focus, especially in swiftly expanding cities like Hyderabad, Pakistan. Despite its importance, social sustainability is frequently overlooked, particularly in developing regions. This research examines the planning frameworks shaping socially sustainable residential areas in Qasimabad Taluka, Hyderabad City. Once lush farmland, Qasimabad has swiftly transformed into residential sectors. This transition has led to declining living standards and weakened social sustainability metrics. Through meticulous analysis, this study evaluates the community engagement, inclusivity and accessibility, social cohesion and safety, and facilities and amenities factors of social sustainability in the residential neighborhoods of Qasimabad Taluka using field visits and a comprehensive questionnaire survey with a sample size of 307 adopting cluster and quota sampling techniques. Data analysis with SPSS-22, supported by reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and Yeh’s satisfaction index model reveals key elements such as community accessibility, safety, green spaces, and aesthetic appeal. The findings reveal deteriorating infrastructure in Qasimabad, emphasizing the necessity for substantial interventions in infrastructure development, public space revitalization, and the cultivation of civic consciousness. Addressing these issues is vital for fostering neighborhoods that are both livable and socially cohesive. By shedding light on these critical needs, urban planners can effectively create sustainable living environments in Qasimabad Taluka.

Suggested Citation

  • Hina Marvi & Saima Kalwar & Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur & Irfan Ahmed Memon & Mehnaz Soomro & Noman Ahsan, 2024. "Cultivating Community: Addressing Social Sustainability in Rapidly Urbanizing Hyderabad City, Pakistan," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-27, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:161-:d:1464627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/9/161/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/9/161/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ana Paula Lima Vilela & Michelle Simões Reboita & Luiz Felipe Silva & Miglena Krasimirova Gerasimova & Daniele Ornaghi Sant’Anna, 2020. "Sustainable neighborhoods in Brazil: a comparison of concepts and applications," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 6001-6028, August.
    2. Kosa Golić & Vesna Kosorić & Slavica Stamatovic Vuckovic & Kosara Kujundzic, 2023. "Strategies for Realization of Socially Sustainable Residential Buildings: Experts’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-31, April.
    3. Edwin Chan & Grace Lee, 2008. "Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 243-256, January.
    4. Theodoridou, Ifigeneia & Papadopoulos, Agis M. & Hegger, Manfred, 2012. "A feasibility evaluation tool for sustainable cities – A case study for Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 207-216.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Valentinas Podvezko & Ieva Ubarte & Arturas Kaklauskas, 2017. "MCDM Assessment of a Healthy and Safe Built Environment According to Sustainable Development Principles: A Practical Neighborhood Approach in Vilnius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Jubril Olakitan Atanda & Ayşe Öztürk, 2020. "Social criteria of sustainable development in relation to green building assessment tools," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 61-87, January.
    3. Zheng, Wei & Shen, Geoffrey Qiping & Wang, Hao & Hong, Jingke & Li, Zhengdao, 2017. "Decision support for sustainable urban renewal: A multi-scale model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 361-371.
    4. Sabina Kordana-Obuch & Michał Wojtoń & Mariusz Starzec & Beata Piotrowska, 2023. "Opportunities and Challenges for Research on Heat Recovery from Wastewater: Bibliometric and Strategic Analyses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-36, September.
    5. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Seung Wan Hong & Hwanjin Kim & Yongjun Song & Sung Hoon Yoon & Jaewook Lee, 2020. "Effects of Human Behavior Simulation on Usability Factors of Social Sustainability in Architectural Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Nagamani Subramanian & M. Suresh, 2022. "Social Sustainability Factors Influencing the Implementation of Sustainable HRM in Manufacturing SMEs," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 469-507, December.
    8. Qi Zhang & Esther Hiu-Kwan Yung & Edwin Hon-Wan Chan, 2021. "Meshing Sustainability with Satisfaction: An Investigation of Residents’ Perceptions in Three Different Neighbourhoods in Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-32, November.
    9. Han, Baolong & Liu, Hongxiao & Wang, Rusong, 2015. "Urban ecological security assessment for cities in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei metropolitan region based on fuzzy and entropy methods," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 217-225.
    10. Juan, Yi-Kai & Castro, Daniel & Roper, Kathy, 2010. "Decision support approach based on multiple objectives and resources for assessing the relocation plan of dangerous hillside aggregations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 265-272, April.
    11. Abbas Hassan & Hyowon Lee, 2015. "The paradox of the sustainable city: definitions and examples," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 1267-1285, December.
    12. Seyda Akcali & Arzu Cahantimur, 2022. "The Pentagon Model of Urban Social Sustainability: An Assessment of Sociospatial Aspects, Comparing Two Neighborhoods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    13. Kosa Golić & Vesna Kosorić & Siu-Kit Lau, 2020. "A Framework for Early Stages of Socially Sustainable Renovation of Multifamily Buildings with Occupants’ Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.
    14. Taimaz Larimian & Arash Sadeghi, 2021. "Measuring urban social sustainability: Scale development and validation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 621-637, May.
    15. Raziyeh Teimouri & Sadasivam Karuppannan & Alpana Sivam & Ning Gu, 2019. "Social sustainability with Urban Green Space (UGS) planning," Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, Dr. Yi-Hsing Hsieh, vol. 5(5), pages 236-247.
    16. Gregor Wolbring & Theresa Rybchinski, 2013. "Social Sustainability and Its Indicators through a Disability Studies and an Ability Studies Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(11), pages 1-19, November.
    17. Luise L Langergaard, 2019. "Interpreting ‘the social’: Exploring processes of social sustainability in Danish nonprofit housing," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(5), pages 456-470, August.
    18. Yang Tang & Yongbo Yuan & Boquan Tian, 2023. "Analysis of the Driving Mechanism of Land Comprehensive Carrying Capacity from the Perspective of Urban Renewal," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, July.
    19. Dan Chen & Pengcheng Xiang & Fuyuan Jia & Jian Zhang & Zhaowen Liu, 2020. "An Indicator System for Evaluating Operation and Maintenance Management of Mega Infrastructure Projects in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Ionuț Viorel Herghiligiu & Ioan-Bogdan Robu & Marinela Istrate & Maria Grosu & Camelia Cătălina Mihalciuc & Adrian Vilcu, 2023. "Sustainable Corporate Performance Based on Audit Report Influence: An Empirical Approach through Financial Transparency and Gender Equality Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-28, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:9:p:161-:d:1464627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.