IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v14y2024i8p156-d1460437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Indigenous Community Radio as Two-Way Communications Infrastructure: Communal Engagement and Political Mobilization in Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Andrés Tapia

    (Unidad de Posgrado, Universidad de Investigación e Innovación de México, Cuernavaca 62290, Mexico)

  • Nicholas Simpson

    (Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

  • Carolyn Smith-Morris

    (O’Donnell School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA)

Abstract

Because Indigenous peoples face unique challenges to their autonomy and lifeways from dominant media influences, Indigenous radio has been used to facilitate intra-community engagement among these groups. A small but long-standing literature reveals both strengths and vulnerabilities of Indigenous radio, though the rapidly changing communications landscape suggests new possibilities for these media sources. Our research was a community–academic collaboration that employed exploratory and mixed (survey, interview, and observational) methods across two Indigenous communities in the Central and Southern Amazon of Ecuador. The Indigenous radio station, La Voz de la CONFENIAE (Confederación de las Nacionalidades Indígenas de la Amazonía Ecuatoriana), sought to perform an impact assessment that would measure both the character and extent of the impact of radio programming with sensitivity to the priorities of listeners as to the purpose, function, and appropriate impact metrics for an Indigenous radio station. A total of 92 surveys and 30 interviews across two communities were conducted in July and August of 2022. Our findings reveal (a) the informational function of this radio for the Indigenous communities in its listening reach; (b) that radio programming conveys family, community, and cultural knowledge bi-directionally both from and to its listening audience; and (c) that members of the audience were, in turn, prompted to action and engagement. In our discussion, we identify opportunities to improve the assessment of community-owned radio as a bidirectional resource for communities. Our work also advances a model of self-determined and stakeholder-driven evaluation for Indigenous community radio, with particular attention to the material (e.g., behavioral) impacts of radio messages and potential for radio to support communal and collective engagements desired by the communities it serves.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrés Tapia & Nicholas Simpson & Carolyn Smith-Morris, 2024. "Assessing Indigenous Community Radio as Two-Way Communications Infrastructure: Communal Engagement and Political Mobilization in Ecuador," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:156-:d:1460437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/8/156/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/8/156/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vasudevan, Srinivasan, 2023. "Radio and technology adoption during India’s Green Revolution: Evidence from a natural experiment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. Mandy Li-Ming Yap & Krushil Watene, 2019. "The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Indigenous Peoples: Another Missed Opportunity?," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 451-467, October.
    3. Raul Reis, 2016. "The Impact of Media on Traditional Communities," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 1-2.
    4. Kerry McCallum & Lisa Waller & Tanja Dreher, 2016. "Mediatisation, Marginalisation and Disruption in Australian Indigenous Affairs," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 30-42.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annamaria Di Fabio & Marc A. Rosen, 2020. "An Exploratory Study of a New Psychological Instrument for Evaluating Sustainability: The Sustainable Development Goals Psychological Inventory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Anna Normyle & Michael Vardon & Bruce Doran, 2022. "Ecosystem accounting and the need to recognise Indigenous perspectives," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    3. Bianca Haas, 2023. "Achieving SDG 14 in an equitable and just way," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 199-205, June.
    4. Brennan Vogel & Lilia Yumagulova & Gordon McBean & Kerry Ann Charles Norris, 2022. "Indigenous-Led Nature-Based Solutions for the Climate Crisis: Insights from Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Johannes M Waldmüller & Mandy Yap & Krushil Watene, 2022. "Remaking the Sustainable Development Goals: relational Indigenous epistemologies [Assessing national progress and priorities for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Experience from Australia]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(4), pages 471-485.
    6. Tomalin, Emma & Dyer, Caroline & Choksi, Archana, 2024. "The doublespeak of ‘leave no one behind’: Implications for religious inequality in Hindu and Muslim pastoralist communities in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Anne Kaun & Maria Kyriakidou & Julie Uldam, 2016. "Political Agency at the Digital Crossroads?," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 1-7.
    8. Tamara Riley & Bonny Cumming & Joanne Thandrayen & Anna Meredith & Neil E. Anderson & Raymond Lovett, 2023. "One Health and Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities: A One Health Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Jonathan Pickering, 2023. "Can democracy accelerate sustainability transformations? Policy coherence for participatory co-existence," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 141-148, June.
    10. Delprato, Marcos & Frola, Alessia & Antequera, Germán, 2022. "Indigenous and non-Indigenous proficiency gaps for out-of-school and in-school populations: A machine learning approach," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    11. Adriana Lopez-Villalobos & Dionne Bunsha & Delanie Austin & Laura Caddy & Jennifer Douglas & Andy Hill & Kevin Kubeck & Patrick Lewis & Ben Stormes & Ryo Sugiyama & Tara Moreau, 2022. "Aligning to the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Assessing Contributions of UBC Botanical Garden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Kate Sollis & Nicholas Biddle & Herdiyan Maulana & Mandy Yap & Paul Campbell, 2024. "Measuring Wellbeing Across Culture and Context – are we Getting it Right? Evaluating the Variation in Wellbeing Conceptualisations Throughout the World," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 123-155, August.
    13. Stephanie Russo Carroll & Michele Suina & Mary Beth Jäger & Jessica Black & Stephen Cornell & Angela A. Gonzales & Miriam Jorgensen & Nancy Lynn Palmanteer-Holder & Jennifer S. De La Rosa & Nicolette , 2022. "Reclaiming Indigenous Health in the US: Moving beyond the Social Determinants of Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-12, June.
    14. Anne Kaun & Maria Kyriakidou & Julie Uldam, 2016. "Political Agency at the Digital Crossroads?," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 1-7.
    15. Scheyvens, Regina & Carr, Anna & Movono, Apisalome & Hughes, Emma & Higgins-Desbiolles, Freya & Mika, Jason Paul, 2021. "Indigenous tourism and the sustainable development goals," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:156-:d:1460437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.