IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v14y2024i7p121-d1436267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Instruments to Assess People’s Attitude and Behaviours towards Tolerance: A Systematic Review of Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Hiroko Costantini

    (Institute for Future Initiatives, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
    Institute of Gerontology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
    Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4BH, UK)

  • Muhammad Abdul Aziz Al Mujahid

    (Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan)

  • Kengo Hosaka

    (Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa City 277-8561, Chiba, Japan)

  • Takazumi Ono

    (Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan)

  • Misato Nihei

    (Institute of Gerontology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
    Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan)

Abstract

While tolerance is recognised as important, especially to diverse societies, understanding tolerance poses complexities, both theoretically and in practical application. Tolerance is relevant in different social contexts, yet these pose distinct challenges to measurement. Thus, understanding the measurement of tolerance is important. This study provides a systematic review of tolerance scales, with the procedure based on the PRISMA statement. The initial collection of over 1600 papers through the systematic review process yielded a set of 11 papers. These papers trace the development of tolerance scales to encompass distinct social contexts over time, including political, cultural, ethnic and racial, racial and religious, gender and sexual, and social. Correspondingly, the approaches reflect particular challenges relevant to these domains for understanding and measuring tolerance. In contrast, some recent contributions aim to develop broader, less context-specific means to assess tolerance. Notwithstanding the breadth of articles included, this systematic review yielded articles that covered only selected Western-centric geographies: this indicates the opportunity for further research to access and integrate non-English-language articles to broaden the geographical and cultural perspectives on tolerance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiroko Costantini & Muhammad Abdul Aziz Al Mujahid & Kengo Hosaka & Takazumi Ono & Misato Nihei, 2024. "Instruments to Assess People’s Attitude and Behaviours towards Tolerance: A Systematic Review of Literature," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:121-:d:1436267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/7/121/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/14/7/121/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mutz, Diana C., 2002. "Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 96(1), pages 111-126, March.
    2. Sullivan, John L. & Marcus, George E. & Feldman, Stanley & Piereson, James E., 1981. "The Sources of Political Tolerance: A Multivariate Analysis," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(1), pages 92-106, March.
    3. Liberati Caterina & Longaretti Riccarda & Michelangeli Alessandra, 2021. "Measuring Tolerant Behavior," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 241(2), pages 149-171, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allison Harell, 2010. "Political Tolerance, Racist Speech, and the Influence of Social Networks," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 91(3), pages 724-740, September.
    2. Benjamin A. Lyons, 2019. "Discussion Network Activation: An Expanded Approach to Selective Exposure," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 32-41.
    3. Douglas Guilbeault & Damon Centola, 2020. "Networked collective intelligence improves dissemination of scientific information regarding smoking risks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Fiorillo, Damiano & Sabatini, Fabio, 2015. "Structural social capital and health in Italy," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 129-142.
    5. Susan Welch, 2014. "American Opinion Toward Jews During the Nazi Era: Results from Quota Sample Polling During the 1930s and 1940s," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 95(3), pages 615-635, September.
    6. James E. Alt & Amalie Jensen & Horacio Larreguy & David D. Lassen & John Marshall, 2022. "Diffusing Political Concerns: How Unemployment Information Passed between Social Ties Influences Danish Voters," Post-Print hal-03566206, HAL.
    7. Thomas C. O'Brien & Tom R. Tyler & Tracey L. Meares, 2020. "Building popular legitimacy with reconciliatory gestures and participation: A community‐level model of authority," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 821-839, October.
    8. Ellen Quintelier & Yves Dejaeghere, 2008. "Does European Citizenship Increase Tolerance in Young People?," European Union Politics, , vol. 9(3), pages 339-362, September.
    9. Fabio Sabatini, 2006. "Social Capital, Public Spending and the Quality of Economic Development: The Case of Italy," Working Papers 2006.14, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    10. Maarten Johannes Bezouw & Anastasia Garyfallou & Ioana-Elena Oană & Sebastien Rojon, 2019. "A methodology for cross-national comparative focus group research: illustrations from discussions about political protest," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(6), pages 2719-2739, November.
    11. Liu, Manwei, 2021. "Interdependent individuals : How aggregation, observation, and persuasion affect economic behavior and judgment," Other publications TiSEM ab3ef470-c4a4-4d6c-ba1a-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. T. Y. Wang & Lu‐huei Chen, 2008. "Political Tolerance in Taiwan: Democratic Elitism in a Polity Under Threat," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 89(3), pages 780-801, September.
    13. Lutgard Lams & Xavier Liao, 2011. "Tracing “Taiwanization†Processes in Taiwanese Presidential Statements in Times of Cross-Strait Rapprochement," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 40(1), pages 63-98.
    14. Simplice A. Asongu & Jacinta C. Nwachukwu & Stella-Maris I. Orim & Chris Pyke, 2019. "Crime and Social Media," Research Africa Network Working Papers 19/003, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    15. Daphna Canetti-Nisim & Eran Halperin & Keren Sharvit & Stevan E. Hobfoll, 2009. "A New Stress-Based Model of Political Extremism," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 53(3), pages 363-389, June.
    16. Bruno Arpino & Alessandro Di Nallo, 2022. "Sleeping with the enemy. Partners’ political attitudes and risk of separation," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2022_06, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".
    17. Seungsu Lee & Jaeho Cho, 2022. "When CNN Praises Trump: Effects of Content and Source on Hostile Media Perception," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    18. Volckart, Oliver, 2018. "The dear old holy Roman realm. How does it hold together? Monetary policies, cross-cutting cleavages and political cohesion in the age of reformation," Economic History Working Papers 90503, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    19. Simplice A. Asongu & Stella-Maris I. Orim & Rexon T. Nting, 2019. "Terrorism and Social Media: Global Evidence," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 208-228, July.
    20. Maija Karjalainen & Lauri Rapeli, 2015. "Who will not deliberate? Attrition in a multi-stage citizen deliberation experiment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 407-422, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:121-:d:1436267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.