IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v13y2023i4p91-d1114319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Official Information on Twitter during the Pandemic in Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Soledad García-García

    (Social and Legal Sciences, Escuela Internacional de Doctorado (EID), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos de Madrid, 28933 Madrid, Spain)

  • Raquel Rodríguez-Díaz

    (Dpto de Periodismo y Comunicación Corporativa, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos de Madrid, 28942 Fuenlabrada, Spain)

Abstract

This article shows the use of Twitter that the main official spokespersons of the Spanish government made during the first weeks of the pandemic, with the aim of analyzing how government health campaigns were managed during the exceptional period of the state of alarm to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic and whether the instructions in terms of institutional management of communication to combat the infodemic set by the World Health Organization (WHO) were followed. This research considers the diffusion of official information in different phases of the first three months of the government’s action (102 days) from the outbreak of COVID-19 in Spain (March 2020) and how it developed its approach to crisis communication using the Twitter accounts of the President of the Spanish government (@sanchezcastejon), front-line leaders and the Ministry of Health (@sanidadgob), the main public institution responsible for health crisis management with the hashtags #EsteVirusLoParamosUnidos and #COVID-19. The results of a sample of 750 tweets reveal how the official sources used a model of online communication with a particular emphasis on informative and motivational tweets from leaders aimed at audiences (media and the general public). At the same time, there is also an instructive function about the pandemic towards audiences (general public and companies), with the Ministry and health authorities playing a key, proactive role in an attempt to achieve informative transparency to mitigate the pandemic and infodemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Soledad García-García & Raquel Rodríguez-Díaz, 2023. "Official Information on Twitter during the Pandemic in Spain," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:91-:d:1114319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/4/91/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/4/91/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georg Geotz & Daniel Herold & Phil-Adrian Klotz & Jan Schaefer, 2021. "Efficiency in Covid-19 Vaccination Campaigns – A Comparison across Germany’s Federal States," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202121, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    2. Ronnie Das & Wasim Ahmed, 2022. "Rethinking Fake News: Disinformation and Ideology during the time of COVID-19 Global Pandemic," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 11(1), pages 146-159, January.
    3. Ante, Lennart, 2023. "How Elon Musk's Twitter activity moves cryptocurrency markets," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    4. Volker Gehrau & Sam Fujarski & Hannah Lorenz & Carla Schieb & Bernd Blöbaum, 2021. "The Impact of Health Information Exposure and Source Credibility on COVID-19 Vaccination Intention in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nobanee, Haitham & Ellili, Nejla Ould Daoud, 2023. "What do we know about meme stocks? A bibliometric and systematic review, current streams, developments, and directions for future research," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 589-602.
    2. Xiaodong Yang & Lai Wei & Zhiyue Liu, 2022. "Promoting COVID-19 Vaccination Using the Health Belief Model: Does Information Acquisition from Divergent Sources Make a Difference?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Stefano Bruzzese & Wasim Ahmed & Simone Blanc & Filippo Brun, 2022. "Ecosystem Services: A Social and Semantic Network Analysis of Public Opinion on Twitter," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez & Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez & Juan Antonio Simón-Sanjurjo & Ana Isabel Beltran-Velasco & Carmen Cecilia Laborde-Cárdenas & Juan Camilo Benitez-Agudelo & Álvaro Bustamante-, 2022. "Mis–Dis Information in COVID-19 Health Crisis: A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-24, April.
    5. Daniel Catalan-Matamoros & Andrea Langbecker, 2023. "How Does the Public Receive Information about Vaccines during the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in Spain," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-11, March.
    6. Hein de Vries & Wouter Verputten & Christian Preissner & Gerjo Kok, 2022. "COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: The Role of Information Sources and Beliefs in Dutch Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Klotz, Phil-Adrian, 2022. "Leadership Communication and COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy," VfS Annual Conference 2022 (Basel): Big Data in Economics 264050, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    8. Bhambhwani, Siddharth M. & Huang, Allen H., 2024. "Auditing decentralized finance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    9. Saggu, Aman & Ante, Lennart, 2023. "The influence of ChatGPT on artificial intelligence related crypto assets: Evidence from a synthetic control analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PB).
    10. Phil-Adrian Klotz, 2022. "Leadership Communication and COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202206, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    11. Jarosław Drobnik & Robert Susło & Piotr Pobrotyn & Ewa Fabich & Violetta Magiera & Dorota Diakowska & Izabella Uchmanowicz, 2021. "COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers in the University Clinical Hospital in Wroclaw, Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Efstathios Polyzos & Ghulame Rubbaniy & Mieszko Mazur, 2024. "Efficient Market Hypothesis on the blockchain: A social‐media‐based index for cryptocurrency efficiency," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 59(3), pages 807-829, August.
    13. Phil-Adrian Klotz, 2022. "Leadership communication and COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy," French Stata Users' Group Meetings 2022 26, Stata Users Group.
    14. Ruoheng Liu & Yi-Hui Christine Huang & Jie Sun & Jennifer Lau & Qinxian Cai, 2022. "A Shot in the Arm for Vaccination Intention: The Media and the Health Belief Model in Three Chinese Societies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Ghosh, Indranil & Alfaro-Cortés, Esteban & Gámez, Matías & García-Rubio, Noelia, 2024. "Reflections of public perception of Russia-Ukraine conflict and Metaverse on the financial outlook of Metaverse coins: Fresh evidence from Reddit sentiment analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    16. Jose Ramon Saura & Daniel Palacios-Marqués & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano, 2023. "Leveraging SMEs technologies adoption in the Covid-19 pandemic: a case study on Twitter-based user-generated content," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 1696-1722, October.
    17. Osnat Roth-Cohen & Shalom Levy & Avi Zigdon, 2021. "The Mediated Role of Credibility on Information Sources and Patient Awareness toward Patient Rights," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-15, August.
    18. Si Mohammed, Kamel & Khalfaoui, Rabeh & Doğan, Buhari & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Mentel, Urszula, 2023. "The reaction of the metal and gold resource planning in the post-COVID-19 era and Russia-Ukrainian conflict: Role of fossil fuel markets for portfolio hedging strategies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:91-:d:1114319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.