IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v12y2022i6p180-d991037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘You Know Them All’—Trust, Cooperation, and Cultural Volunteering in Rural Areas in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Thi Huyen Trang Le

    (Department of Political Education and Education Systems, Leipzig University, 04107 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Nina Kolleck

    (Department of Educational Research and Social Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

(1) Background: Rural areas are characterised by a higher number of volunteers compared to urban centres in Germany. In this context, cultural and arts education is one of the largest voluntary sectors. However, an increasing decline in (cultural) volunteering can be observed. To counteract the decrease, it is important to strengthen regional cooperation and social networks, which are based on trust. The connection between trust, volunteering, and social networks has already been examined, but we still do not fully understand the emergence of trust in the link of cultural education cooperation and networks in rural areas. (2) Methods: A total of 34 semi-structured interviews in combination with egocentric network maps were conducted in four rural regions. The interview data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using qualitative content analysis. (3) Results: Four dimensions of trust-building were identified: 1. presence and spatial proximity, 2. multiplexity, 3. third party, and 4. community spirit.

Suggested Citation

  • Thi Huyen Trang Le & Nina Kolleck, 2022. "‘You Know Them All’—Trust, Cooperation, and Cultural Volunteering in Rural Areas in Germany," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:6:p:180-:d:991037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/6/180/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/6/180/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lea Fobel & Nina Kolleck, 2021. "Cultural Education: Panacea or Amplifier of Existing Inequalities in Political Engagement?," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 324-336.
    2. Geys, Benny, 2012. "Association membership and generalised trust: Are connections between associations losing their value?," Discussion Papers, Research Professorship & Project "The Future of Fiscal Federalism" SP II 2012-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kenneth Horvath & Regula Julia Leemann, 2021. "The Politics of Inequalities in Education: Exploring Epistemic Orders and Educational Arrangements of Durable Disadvantaging," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 296-300.
    2. Anna Almakaeva & Eduard Ponarin & Christian Welzel, 2014. "Human Development And Generalized Trust: Multilevel Evidence," HSE Working papers WP BRP 58/SOC/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    3. Anna Almakaeva & Christian Welzel & Eduard Ponarin, 2018. "Human Empowerment and Trust in Strangers: The Multilevel Evidence," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 923-962, October.
    4. Marie-Therese Arnold & Thi Huyen Trang Le & Nina Kolleck, 2022. "Expectations of Cross-Sector Collaboration in Cultural and Arts Education," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:6:p:180-:d:991037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.