IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v11y2021i1p12-d493850.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fourth Ageism: Real and Imaginary Old Age

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Higgs

    (Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London W1T 7NF, UK)

  • Chris Gilleard

    (Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London W1T 7NF, UK)

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the issue of ageism and its salience in current debates about the COVID-19 pandemic. In it, we address the question of how best to interpret the impact that the pandemic has had on the older population. While many feel angry at what they see as discriminatory lock-down practices confining older people to their homes, others are equally concerned by the failure of state responses to protect and preserve the health of older people, especially those receiving long-term care. This contrast in framing ageist responses to the pandemic, we suggest, arises from differing social representations of later life, reflecting the selective foregrounding of third versus fourth age imaginaries. Recognising the tension between social and biological parameters of ageing and its social categorisations, we suggest, may offer a more measured, as well as a less discriminatory, approach to addressing the selective use of chronological age as a line of demarcation within society.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Higgs & Chris Gilleard, 2021. "Fourth Ageism: Real and Imaginary Old Age," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-7, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:12-:d:493850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/1/12/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/1/12/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlos Miguel Ferreira & Sandro Serpa, 2020. "COVID-19 and Social Sciences," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-3, December.
    2. Carlos Miguel Ferreira & Maria José Sá & José Garrucho Martins & Sandro Serpa, 2020. "The COVID-19 Contagion–Pandemic Dyad: A View from Social Sciences," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fidel Molina-Luque & Ieva Stončikaitė & Teresa Torres-González & Paquita Sanvicen-Torné, 2022. "Profiguration, Active Ageing, and Creativity: Keys for Quality of Life and Overcoming Ageism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Chloé Silva Coelho & Emilie Joly-Burra & Andreas Ihle & Nicola Ballhausen & Maximilian Haas & Alexandra Hering & Morgane Künzi & Gianvito Laera & Greta Mikneviciute & Doriana Tinello & Matthias Kliege, 2022. "Higher levels of neuroticism in older adults predict lower executive functioning across time: the mediating role of perceived stress," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 633-649, September.
    3. Hunter, P.V. & Ward, H.A. & Puurveen, G., 2023. "Trust as a key measure of quality and safety after the restriction of family contact in Canadian long-term care settings during the COVID-19 pandemic," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 18-27.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marko Perić & Vanja Vitezić, 2021. "Tourism Getting Back to Life after COVID-19: Can Artificial Intelligence Help?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Puxin Liu, 2023. "An assessment of financial mechanisms for green financial recovery and climate change mitigation: the case of China," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1567-1584, June.
    3. Manuel Arias-Maldonado, 2020. "COVID-19 as a Global Risk: Confronting the Ambivalences of a Socionatural Threat," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Zhang, LiXia & Baloch, Zulfiqar Ali & Niu, Guangli, 2023. "Effects of COVID-19 on green bonds, renewable power stocks, and carbon markets: A dynamic spillover analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Maria José Sá & Ana Isabel Santos & Sandro Serpa & Carlos Miguel Ferreira, 2021. "Digitainability—Digital Competences Post-COVID-19 for a Sustainable Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Sandro Serpa & Carlos Miguel Ferreira, 2022. "Challenges of Post-COVID-19 for a Sustainably Developed Society," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-4, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:12-:d:493850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.