IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v10y2020i4p82-d435490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scholarship Suppression: Theoretical Perspectives and Emerging Trends

Author

Listed:
  • Sean T. Stevens

    (The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA)

  • Lee Jussim

    (Department of Psychology Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey—New Brunswick, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8554, Canada)

  • Nathan Honeycutt

    (Department of Psychology Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey—New Brunswick, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8554, Canada)

Abstract

This paper explores the suppression of ideas within an academic scholarship by academics, either by self-suppression or because of the efforts of other academics. Legal, moral, and social issues distinguishing freedom of speech, freedom of inquiry, and academic freedom are reviewed. How these freedoms and protections can come into tension is then explored by an analysis of denunciation mobs that exercise their legal free speech rights to call for punishing scholars who express ideas they disapprove of and condemn. When successful, these efforts, which constitute legally protected speech, will suppress certain ideas. Real-world examples over the past five years of academics that have been sanctioned or terminated for scholarship targeted by a denunciation mob are then explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Sean T. Stevens & Lee Jussim & Nathan Honeycutt, 2020. "Scholarship Suppression: Theoretical Perspectives and Emerging Trends," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:82-:d:435490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/4/82/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/10/4/82/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mitchell Langbert & Anthony J. Quain & Daniel B. Klein, 2016. "Faculty Voter Registration in Economics, History, Journalism, Law, and Psychology," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 13(3), pages 422–451-4, September.
    2. Sullivan, John L. & Piereson, James & Marcus, George E., 1979. "An Alternative Conceptualization of Political Tolerance: Illusory Increases 1950s–1970s," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 73(3), pages 781-794, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. April K. Clark & Michael Clark & Marie A. Eisenstein, 2014. "Stability and Change," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, March.
    2. Alan Arwine & Lawrence Mayer, 2014. "Tolerance and the Politics of Identity in the European Union," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 95(3), pages 669-681, September.
    3. Allison Harell, 2010. "Political Tolerance, Racist Speech, and the Influence of Social Networks," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 91(3), pages 724-740, September.
    4. Diana C. Mutz, 2023. "Freedom of Speech in the Post-Floyd Era: Public Support for Political Tolerance," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 708(1), pages 184-205, July.
    5. Francis Lee, 2014. "“Tolerated One Way but Not the Other”: Levels and Determinants of Social and Political Tolerance in Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 711-727, September.
    6. Vivika Halapuu & Tiiu Paas & Tiit Tammaru, 2013. "Is institutional trust related to the attitudes towards immigrants in Europe? A study of majority and minority population," Norface Discussion Paper Series 2013014, Norface Research Programme on Migration, Department of Economics, University College London.
    7. Faniko, Klea & Lorenzi-Cioldi, Fabio & Buschini, Fabrice, 2010. "Education, meritocracy and opinions toward affirmative action targeted at women in Albania," SEER Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 13(4), pages 565-577.
    8. Mitchell Langbert & Anthony J. Quain & Daniel B. Klein, 2017. "Faculty Voter Registration: Rectifying the Omission of Two Florida Universities," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 14(1), pages 1-55–60, January.
    9. T. Y. Wang & Lu‐huei Chen, 2008. "Political Tolerance in Taiwan: Democratic Elitism in a Polity Under Threat," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 89(3), pages 780-801, September.
    10. Robert Postic & Elizabeth Prough, 2014. "That’s Gay! Gay as a Slur Among College Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, November.
    11. Mikael Hjerm & Maureen A. Eger & Andrea Bohman & Filip Fors Connolly, 2020. "A New Approach to the Study of Tolerance: Conceptualizing and Measuring Acceptance, Respect, and Appreciation of Difference," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 897-919, February.
    12. Robert Andersen & Tina Fetner, 2008. "Economic Inequality and Intolerance: Attitudes toward Homosexuality in 35 Democracies," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(4), pages 942-958, October.
    13. Çera Edmond & Sinamati Arta, 2017. "Determinants of Corruption Perception in a Transition Country: Case of Albania," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 5(1), pages 177-185, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:82-:d:435490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.