IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v9y2020i2p21-d324038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Participatory Journalism Management Platform: Design, Implementation and Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Kosmas Panagiotidis

    (Media Informatics Lab, School of Journalism & MC, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 541 24, Greece)

  • Nikolaos Tsipas

    (Laboratory of Electroacoustics and TV Systems, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 541 24, Greece)

  • Theodora Saridou

    (Media Informatics Lab, School of Journalism & MC, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 541 24, Greece)

  • Andreas Veglis

    (Media Informatics Lab, School of Journalism & MC, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 541 24, Greece)

Abstract

During the last two decades, citizens’ participation in news production process has attracted significant interest from both academia and the media industry. Media production and consumption have been altered considerably and traditional concepts, such as gatekeeping, have been under discussion. Many news organisations include in their websites tools and applications that allow users to be active consumers or even co-producers of journalistic content, by liking, sharing, commenting and submitting material. At the same time, large amounts of user-generated content are uploaded every day on social media platforms. Subsequently, media organisations must deal with continually available information which requires management, classification and evaluation not only to keep high journalistic standards, but also to avoid problems. The latter category can include grammar mistakes, fake or misleading information and hate speech. All the above-mentioned parameters highlight the obvious need for platforms that can support journalism manage practice. Such a platform should utilise semantic technologies, which can support organised collection and moderation of content in an effective way and in short time. This study discusses the design and the implementation of a participatory journalism management platform.

Suggested Citation

  • Kosmas Panagiotidis & Nikolaos Tsipas & Theodora Saridou & Andreas Veglis, 2020. "A Participatory Journalism Management Platform: Design, Implementation and Evaluation," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:21-:d:324038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/2/21/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/2/21/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Svenja Boberg & Tim Schatto-Eckrodt & Lena Frischlich & Thorsten Quandt, 2018. "The Moral Gatekeeper? Moderation and Deletion of User-Generated Content in a Leading News Forum," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 58-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iztok Šori & Vasja Vehovar, 2022. "Reported User-Generated Online Hate Speech: The ‘Ecosystem’, Frames, and Ideologies," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikki Usher & Matt Carlson, 2018. "The Midlife Crisis of the Network Society," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 107-110.
    2. James E. Katz, 2018. "Commentary on News and Participation through and beyond Proprietary Platforms in an Age of Social Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 103-106.
    3. Oscar Westlund & Mats Ekström, 2018. "News and Participation through and beyond Proprietary Platforms in an Age of Social Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 1-10.
    4. Hazlett, Thomas W., 2022. "Free speech and the challenge of efficiency," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9).
    5. Meijie Chu & Wentao Song & Zeyu Zhao & Tianmu Chen & Yi-chen Chiang, 2024. "Emotional contagion on social media and the simulation of intervention strategies after a disaster event: a modeling study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Lazaros Vrysis & Nikolaos Vryzas & Rigas Kotsakis & Theodora Saridou & Maria Matsiola & Andreas Veglis & Carlos Arcila-Calderón & Charalampos Dimoulas, 2021. "A Web Interface for Analyzing Hate Speech," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Sue Robinson & Yidong Wang, 2018. "Networked News Participation: Future Pathways," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 91-102.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:21-:d:324038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.