IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v7y2018i10p178-d172570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interdependence Evaluation between the Home Neighborhood and the City: How Socio-Spatial Categorization Impacts upon Residential Segregation

Author

Listed:
  • Kawtar Najib

    (School of Geography Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)

Abstract

This paper proposes a socio-cognitive approach to how people assess the different neighborhoods of a city. The main objective is to show that beyond the meanings associated with each neighborhood, the way in which residents relate to and evaluate their own neighborhood and the city center influence how residents perceive and assess the other remaining neighborhoods of the city. The assessment of one neighborhood cannot be analyzed separately from the other neighborhoods. Cognitive processes of assimilation, contrast, contagion, and non-contagion contribute to the conceptualization of a city’s neighborhoods from the two main emotional and symbolic anchorages of residents. However, the implementation of these processes is conditioned by the socio-spatial situation of the interviewees. In this regard, a field survey of 320 residents was conducted in different neighborhoods of Besançon (in France), and allows us to show that the geographical anchorages of a resident’s own neighborhood and the city center are systematically more positively assessed than the other neighborhoods. The more these geographical anchorages are appreciated, the more the other neighborhoods are also positively assessed. The fact that it is impossible for a city’s neighborhoods to be autonomous is discussed in this paper in terms of socio-cognitive constructions of urban segregations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kawtar Najib, 2018. "Interdependence Evaluation between the Home Neighborhood and the City: How Socio-Spatial Categorization Impacts upon Residential Segregation," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:10:p:178-:d:172570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/10/178/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/10/178/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthieu Permentier & Maarten van Ham & Gideon Bolt, 2009. "Neighbourhood Reputation and the Intention to Leave the Neighbourhood," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(9), pages 2162-2180, September.
    2. Matthieu Permentier & Gideon Bolt & Maarten van Ham, 2011. "Determinants of Neighbourhood Satisfaction and Perception of Neighbourhood Reputation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(5), pages 977-996, April.
    3. Jean-Louis Pan Ké Shon, 2010. "The Ambivalent Nature of Ethnic Segregation in France’s Disadvantaged Neighbourhoods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(8), pages 1603-1623, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ad Coenen & Pieter-Paul Verhaeghe & Bart Van de Putte, 2019. "Ethnic Residential Segregation: A Family Matter? An Integration of Household Composition Characteristics into the Residential Segregation Literature," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 35(5), pages 1023-1052, December.
    2. Sylvia Jansen, 2014. "Why is Housing Always Satisfactory? A Study into the Impact of Cognitive Restructuring and Future Perspectives on Housing Appreciation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 116(2), pages 353-371, April.
    3. Zwiers, Merle & Kleinhans, Reinout & van Ham, Maarten, 2015. "Divided Cities: Increasing Socio-Spatial Polarization within Large Cities in the Netherlands," IZA Discussion Papers 8882, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Eziyi O. Ibem & Pearl A. Opoko & Egidario B. Aduwo, 2017. "Satisfaction with Neighbourhood Environments in Public Housing: Evidence from Ogun State, Nigeria," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 733-757, January.
    5. Alex Fenton & Amanda Fitzgerald & Ruth Lupton, 2013. "Labour's Record on Neighbourhood Renewal in England: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 1997-2010," CASE - Social Policy in a Cold Climate Working Paper 06, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    6. Sebastian Zenker & Sibylle Petersen, 2014. "An Integrative Theoretical Model for Improving Resident-City Identification," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(3), pages 715-729, March.
    7. Pan Ké Shon, Jean-Louis & Verdugo, Gregory, 2014. "Forty Years of Immigrant Segregation in France, 1968-2007: How Different Is the New Immigration?," IZA Discussion Papers 8062, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Gabriel Otero & Quentin Ramond & María Luisa Méndez & Rafael Carranza & Felipe Link & Javier Ruiz-Tagle, 2024. "The damages of stigma, the benefits of prestige: Examining the consequences of perceived residential reputations on neighbourhood attachment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(3), pages 462-494, February.
    9. William AV Clark & Rory Coulter, 2015. "Who wants to move? The role of neighbourhood change," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(12), pages 2683-2709, December.
    10. Lina Hedman & Maarten van Ham & David Manley, 2011. "Neighbourhood Choice and Neighbourhood Reproduction," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(6), pages 1381-1399, June.
    11. Christoph Kern, 2014. "Regional Structures and Mobility Dispositions: A Multilevel Proportional- & Partial-Proportional Odds Approach," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 681, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    12. Troels Schultz Larsen & Kristian Nagel Delica, 2021. "Territorial Destigmatization In An Era Of Policy Schizophrenia," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 423-441, May.
    13. Raoul S. Liévanos & Amy Lubitow & Julius Alexander McGee, 2019. "Misrecognition in a Sustainability Capital: Race, Representation, and Transportation Survey Response Rates in the Portland Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    14. Wiles, Janine L. & Rolleston, Anna & Pillai, Avinesh & Broad, Joanna & Teh, Ruth & Gott, Merryn & Kerse, Ngaire, 2017. "Attachment to place in advanced age: A study of the LiLACS NZ cohort," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 27-37.
    15. Valeria Saiu, 2020. "Evaluating Outwards Regeneration Effects (OREs) in Neighborhood-Based Projects: A Reversal of Perspective and the Proposal for a New Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Vassilis Tselios & Philip McCann & Jouke van Dijk, 2017. "Understanding the gap between reality and expectation: Local social engagement and ethnic concentration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(11), pages 2592-2612, August.
    17. Bofinger, Peter & Buch, Claudia M. & Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Wieland, Volker, 2013. "Gegen eine rückwärtsgewandte Wirtschaftspolitik. Jahresgutachten 2013/14 [Against a backward-looking economic policy. Annual Report 2013/14]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201314.
    18. Alex Fenton & Amanda Fitzgerald & Ruth Lupton, 2013. "Labour’s Record on Neighbourhood Renewal in England: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 1997-2010," CASE Papers case177, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    19. Theresa Kotulla & Jon Martin Denstadli & Are Oust & Elisabeth Beusker, 2019. "What Does It Take to Make the Compact City Liveable for Wider Groups? Identifying Key Neighbourhood and Dwelling Features," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    20. Sarah Pearson & Paul Lawless, 2012. "Population Mobility in Regeneration Areas: Trends, Drivers, and Implications; Evidence from England's New Deal for Communities Programme," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(8), pages 2023-2039, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:10:p:178-:d:172570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.