IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v4y2014i1p1-17d43955.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment in Kinship Foster Care: A New Tool to Evaluate the Strengths and Weaknesses

Author

Listed:
  • Nuria Fuentes-Peláez

    (Department of Methods of Research and Diagnosis in Education, University of Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 171, Edifici Llevant, Barcelona 08035, Spain)

  • Pere Amorós

    (Department of Methods of Research and Diagnosis in Education, University of Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 171, Edifici Llevant, Barcelona 08035, Spain)

  • Crescencia Pastor

    (Department of Methods of Research and Diagnosis in Education, University of Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 171, Edifici Llevant, Barcelona 08035, Spain)

  • María Cruz Molina

    (Department of Methods of Research and Diagnosis in Education, University of Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 171, Edifici Llevant, Barcelona 08035, Spain)

  • Maribel Mateo

    (Department of Methods of Research and Diagnosis in Education, University of Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 171, Edifici Llevant, Barcelona 08035, Spain)

Abstract

Placement in kinship family has existed informally throughout time. There are many countries in which kinship family care is the most common measure used for child protection. However, it is a subject of continuous debate. One of the major issues is that kinship foster care is relied upon without carrying out an evaluation study of the family; often the child is placed directly with grandparents and uncles simply because they are direct family. This article presents an assessment tool to evaluate extended families in order to ensure the welfare of the child. The tool was created as a result of the cooperative research of 126 professionals from seven regions of Spain. The tool can identify the strengths and weaknesses of families by considering six factors: personal characteristics, the coverage of basic needs, collaboration with professionals, the family structure and dynamics, the relationship between family, child, and biological family, and, finally, the attitude towards the placement. The assessment tool is innovative and introduces the opportunity to consider the skills of the kinship foster care family, the needs of support, and which families are unfit to take care of the child. To conclude, the tool tries to overcome one of the principal disadvantages of kinship foster care: the lack of knowledge about the kinship family.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuria Fuentes-Peláez & Pere Amorós & Crescencia Pastor & María Cruz Molina & Maribel Mateo, 2014. "Assessment in Kinship Foster Care: A New Tool to Evaluate the Strengths and Weaknesses," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:1-17:d:43955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/4/1/1/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/4/1/1/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oosterman, Mirjam & Schuengel, Carlo & Wim Slot, N. & Bullens, Ruud A.R. & Doreleijers, Theo A.H., 2007. "Disruptions in foster care: A review and meta-analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 53-76, January.
    2. Lin, Ching-Hsuan, 2014. "Evaluating Services for Kinship Care Families: A Systematic Review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 32-41.
    3. Terling-Watt, Toni, 2001. "Permanency in kinship care: an exploration of disruption rates and factors associated with placement disruption," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 111-126, February.
    4. Littlewood, Kerry A. & Strozier, Anne L. & Whittington, Danielle, 2014. "Kin as Teachers: An early childhood education and support intervention for kinship families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-9.
    5. Berrick, Jill Duerr & Barth, Richard P. & Needell, Barbara, 1994. "A comparison of kinship foster homes and foster family homes: Implications for kinship foster care as family preservation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(1-2), pages 33-63.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gable, Sara & Holliday, Amelia & Zars, Jonathon & Simelus, Sonita & Nickell, Angela & Anderson, Bradd, 2024. "Intergenerational conflict, contact with biological parents, and child functioning in kinship caregiver families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Xu, Yanfeng & Bright, Charlotte Lyn, 2018. "Children's mental health and its predictors in kinship and non-kinship foster care: A systematic review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 243-262.
    3. Lin, Ching-Hsuan, 2014. "Evaluating Services for Kinship Care Families: A Systematic Review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 32-41.
    4. Perry, Gretchen & Daly, Martin & Kotler, Jennifer, 2012. "Placement stability in kinship and non-kin foster care: A Canadian study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 460-465.
    5. Perry, Gretchen & Daly, Martin & Macfarlan, Shane, 2014. "Maternal foster families provide more stable placements than paternal families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 155-159.
    6. Koh, Eun, 2010. "Permanency outcomes of children in kinship and non-kinship foster care: Testing the external validity of kinship effects," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 389-398, March.
    7. Messing, Jill Theresa, 2006. "From the child's perspective: A qualitative analysis of kinship care placements," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 1415-1434, December.
    8. Osborne, Jennifer & Hindt, Lauren A. & Lutz, Nathan & Hodgkinson, Nicole & Leon, Scott C., 2021. "Placement stability among children in kinship and non-kinship foster placements across multiple placements," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    9. Dorval, Amilie & Lamothe, Josianne & Hélie, Sonia & Poirier, Marie-Andrée, 2020. "Different profiles, different needs: An exploration and analysis of characteristics of children in kinship care and their parents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Pelech, William & Badry, Dorothy & Daoust, Gabrielle, 2013. "It takes a team: Improving placement stability among children and youth with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder in care in Canada," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 120-127.
    11. Lin, Ching-Hsuan, 2018. "The relationships between child well-being, caregiving stress, and social engagement among informal and formal kinship care families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 203-216.
    12. Havlicek, Judy, 2011. "Lives in motion: A review of former foster youth in the context of their experiences in the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1090-1100, July.
    13. Waid, Jeffrey & Kothari, Brianne H. & Bank, Lew & McBeath, Bowen, 2016. "Foster care placement change: The role of family dynamics and household composition," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 44-50.
    14. Coakley, Tanya M. & Cuddeback, Gary & Buehler, Cheryl & Cox, Mary Ellen, 2007. "Kinship foster parents' perceptions of factors that promote or inhibit successful fostering," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 92-109, January.
    15. Holtan, Amy & Handegård, Bjørn Helge & Thørnblad, Renee & Vis, Svein Arild, 2013. "Placement disruption in long-term kinship and nonkinship foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1087-1094.
    16. Dolan, Melissa M. & Casanueva, Cecilia & Smith, Keith R. & Bradley, Robert H., 2009. "Parenting and the home environment provided by grandmothers of children in the child welfare system," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 784-796, July.
    17. O'Higgins, Aoife & Sebba, Judy & Gardner, Frances, 2017. "What are the factors associated with educational achievement for children in kinship or foster care: A systematic review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 198-220.
    18. Pac, Jessica, 2017. "The effect of monthly stipend on the placement instability of youths in out-of-home care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 111-123.
    19. Cuddeback, Gary S., 2004. "Kinship family foster care: a methodological and substantive synthesis of research," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 623-639, July.
    20. Lee, Eunju & Choi, Mi Jin & Clarkson-Henderix, Michael, 2016. "Examining needs of informal kinship families: Validating the family needs scale," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 97-104.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:1-17:d:43955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.