IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v14y2024i1p3-d1553114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Racial Authoritarian Preemption and the Politics of Tennessee

Author

Listed:
  • Sekou Franklin

    (Department of Political and Global Affairs, Middle Tennessee State University, 1301 East Main Street, P.O. Box 29, Murfreesboro, TN 37132, USA)

Abstract

Racial authoritarian preemption occurs when state governments overturn, override, and alter the governing power of racially diverse municipalities. Using Tennessee as a case study, this article looks at the convergence of race, authoritarian governance, and state preemption. Three components of racial authoritarian preemption are examined: anti-federal nullification, administrative fiefdoms, and municipal containment. I focus on the period of 2010–2024, when the Tennessee legislature was captured by conservative Republicans, who then used preemption to revoke locally based civil rights, racial equity initiatives, and redistributive measures championed by minoritized communities. In examining preemption, this article draws from primary and secondary sources, including legislative records and the General Social Survey administered by the University of Chicago’s National Opinion Research Center. The article demonstrates that preemption has been weaponized in the twenty-first century to augment the power of far-right state officials and to disempower cities and municipalities that are racially diverse or dominated by Black-led and multi-racial governing institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sekou Franklin, 2024. "Racial Authoritarian Preemption and the Politics of Tennessee," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:3-:d:1553114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/1/3/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/1/3/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joe Soss & Richard C. Fording & Sanford F. Schram, 2008. "The Color of Devolution: Race, Federalism, and the Politics of Social Control," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(3), pages 536-553, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernecker, Andreas, 2016. "Divided we reform? Evidence from US welfare policies," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 24-38.
    2. Brianna Turgeon & Kaitlyn Root & Kasey Ray & Tiffany Taylor, 2022. "“It's embarrassing to come here”: Welfare‐to‐work, emotion rules, and emotional capital," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 8-24, March.
    3. Leah Hamilton & Mathieu Despard & Stephen Roll & Dylan Bellisle & Christian Hall & Allison Wright, 2023. "Does Frequency or Amount Matter? An Exploratory Analysis the Perceptions of Four Universal Basic Income Proposals," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Chung, Yiyoon, 2015. "Does SNAP serve as a safety net for mothers facing an economic shock? An analysis of Black and White unwed mothers' responses to paternal imprisonment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 179-192.
    5. Parolin, Zachary, 2019. "Decomposing the Decline of Cash Assistance in the United States, 1993 to 2016," OSF Preprints b9vft_v1, Center for Open Science.
    6. Parolin, Zachary & Luigjes, Christiaan, 2019. "Incentive to Retrench? Investigating the Interactions of State and Federal Social Assistance Programs after Welfare Reform," OSF Preprints s5fwr, Center for Open Science.
    7. Hipp, Lena & Anderson, Christopher J., 2015. "Laziness or liberation? Labor market policies and workers' attitudes toward employment flexibility," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101872, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Parolin, Zachary & Luigjes, Christiaan, 2019. "Incentive to Retrench? Investigating the Interactions of State and Federal Social Assistance Programs after Welfare Reform," OSF Preprints s5fwr_v1, Center for Open Science.
    9. Elizabeth Nisbet & Heather A. McKay & Sara Haviland, 2017. "The Emergence of Local Practices in a Devolved Workforce Investment System: Barriers and Possibilities for Enhancing Degree Completion," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 31(3), pages 183-195, August.
    10. Zachary Parolin, 2018. "Race, Social Assistance & the Risk of Child Poverty across the 50 United States," Working Papers 1804, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    11. Andreas Bernecker, 2014. "Divided We Reform? Evidence from US Welfare Policies," CESifo Working Paper Series 4564, CESifo.
    12. Zachary Parolin & Christiaan Luigjes, 2018. "Incentive to Retrench? Institutional Moral Hazard among Federal & State Social Assistance Programs after Welfare Reform," Working Papers 1802, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:3-:d:1553114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.