IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i12p659-d1289745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is It a Crime? Cyberstalking Victims’ Reasons for Not Reporting to Law Enforcement

Author

Listed:
  • Erica R. Fissel

    (Department of Criminal Justice, College of Community Innovation and Education, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA)

Abstract

Using a sample of 376 young adults (18- to 25-year-olds) who had been cyberstalked in the previous 12 months, the current study attempts to (1) understand the self-identified reasons behind cyberstalking victims’ choice to not report their experiences to law enforcement and (2) determine if there are gender or racial differences associated with the reasons for not reporting. Findings revealed that approximately 86% of cyberstalking victims did not personally report their victimization to law enforcement. The most common reasons for not reporting included not knowing their experience was criminal in nature (53.99%), dealing with it another way (42.82%), and thinking the police would not do anything for them (32.98%) or would not be helpful (31.91%). Analyses also revealed that there were gender-specific differences in one of the reasons for not reporting. Women and another gender identity selected “Thought the police would not do anything” significantly more than men. Implications for these findings are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Erica R. Fissel, 2023. "Is It a Crime? Cyberstalking Victims’ Reasons for Not Reporting to Law Enforcement," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-12, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:12:p:659-:d:1289745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/12/659/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/12/659/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emma Short & Andrew Guppy & Jacqui A. Hart & James Barnes, 2015. "The Impact of Cyberstalking," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 23-37, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tatiana Begotti & Martina Bollo & Daniela Acquadro Maran, 2020. "Coping Strategies and Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Young Adult Victims of Cyberstalking: A Questionnaire Survey in an Italian Sample," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Joanne D. Worsley & Jacqueline M. Wheatcroft & Emma Short & Rhiannon Corcoran, 2017. "Victims’ Voices: Understanding the Emotional Impact of Cyberstalking and Individuals’ Coping Responses," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, May.
    3. Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep & Tandon, Anushree & Alzeiby, Ebtesam A. & Abohassan, Abeer Ahmed, 2021. "A systematic literature review on cyberstalking. An analysis of past achievements and future promises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:12:p:659-:d:1289745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.